Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Granada, Faculty of Health Sciences, Campus of Melilla, Querol Street, 5, 52004, Melilla, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 10;13(1):2383. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29601-0.
This study investigated the intra-rater reliability of a novice ultrasound (US) examiner and the inter-rater reliability of two examiners (novice, expert) in the measures of coracohumeral distance at rest (CHD) and at 60° of elevation without (CHD60) or with weights (CHD60w), tendon thickness of the long head of the biceps (LHB) and subscapularis (SCP). Twenty-one patients with subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) and 20 asymptomatic participants were included. Intra and inter-rater reliability were tested with intraclass-correlation-coefficient (ICC), differences between raters were analyzed with Bland-Altman plots. Intra-rater reliability for CHD, CHD60 and CHD60w was excellent (ICC = 0.97-0.98) in asymptomatic participants, and good-to-excellent (0.88-0.93) in SAPS, while intra-rater reliability for LHB and SCP was good-to-excellent in asymptomatic participants (0.88-0.97) and in SAPS (0.90-0.92). Inter-rater reliability for CHD, CHD60 and CHD60w was moderate-to-good (0.70-0.90) in asymptomatic participants and good (0.85-0.87) in SAPS, in contrast inter-rater reliability for LHB and SCP was poor in asymptomatic participants (0.10-0.46) and poor-to-moderate (0.49-0.61) in SAPS. Bland-Altman plots revealed systematic and/or proportional bias for tendons' thickness. A novice showed good-to-excellent intra-rater reliability in all US measures, whereas in comparison to an expert a novice can measure reliably CHD, CHD60 and CHD60w, but not LHB and SCP, where more training is recommended.
本研究旨在探讨一位新手超声(US)检查者的组内可靠性,以及两位检查者(新手、专家)在以下测量指标中的组间可靠性:休息时(CHD)和 60°外展时(CHD60)或负重时(CHD60w)的喙肱距离、肱二头肌长头肌腱(LHB)和肩胛下肌(SCP)厚度。纳入了 21 例肩峰下疼痛综合征(SAPS)患者和 20 名无症状参与者。采用组内相关系数(ICC)检验组内和组间可靠性,通过 Bland-Altman 图分析检查者之间的差异。在无症状参与者中,CHD、CHD60 和 CHD60w 的组内可靠性为优(ICC=0.97-0.98),在 SAPS 患者中为良至优(0.88-0.93),而 LHB 和 SCP 的组内可靠性在无症状参与者中为良至优(0.88-0.97),在 SAPS 患者中为优(0.90-0.92)。在无症状参与者中,CHD、CHD60 和 CHD60w 的组间可靠性为中至高(0.70-0.90),在 SAPS 患者中为优(0.85-0.87),而 LHB 和 SCP 的组间可靠性在无症状参与者中为差至中(0.10-0.46),在 SAPS 患者中为差至中(0.49-0.61)。Bland-Altman 图显示肌腱厚度存在系统和/或比例偏差。新手在所有 US 测量中均显示出良好至优的组内可靠性,而与专家相比,新手可以可靠地测量 CHD、CHD60 和 CHD60w,但不能测量 LHB 和 SCP,因此建议进行更多的培训。