Redmond F C
Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1987;15(3):247-56.
Wills are more prone to challenge on the issue of testamentary capacity because, as people live longer, they are more likely to have the kind of conditions that interfere with capacity and because the courts seem to be more apt to hear evidence and allow findings of lack of testamentary capacity than in the past. Therefore, it is incumbent on attorneys to protect the interests of their clients by addressing the issue of testamentary capacity in any case in which a will contest might be anticipated. Ideally, attorneys in such situations should have their clients counsel with a psychiatrist who is knowledgeable and experienced in matters of probate and will contests. Further, the attorney and the client must provide extensive data (of the kind which a jury might ultimately obtain) on which the psychiatrist can base his or her conclusions that the client is of "sound mind."
遗嘱在遗嘱能力问题上更容易受到质疑,原因在于,随着人们寿命延长,他们更有可能出现影响能力的状况,而且与过去相比,法院似乎更倾向于听取证据并认可缺乏遗嘱能力的认定。因此,在任何有可能预见遗嘱争议的案件中,律师有责任通过解决遗嘱能力问题来保护其客户的利益。理想情况下,处于此类情形的律师应让其客户咨询一位在遗嘱认证和遗嘱争议事务方面知识渊博且经验丰富的精神病医生。此外,律师和客户必须提供大量数据(这类数据陪审团最终可能会获取),精神病医生可据此得出客户“心智健全”的结论。