Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha, 769008, India.
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Feb 10;23(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03791-8.
This article aims to examine the level of life satisfaction (LS) among Indian older adults and to determine whether their living arrangement is one of the potential determinants of their level of LS.
Data was drawn from the first and most recent wave of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India conducted in 2017-18. Using the Satisfaction with Life Scale, the level of LS was assessed for 30,370 elderly aged 60 + . Bivariate analysis was carried out to see the variation in the level of LS across elderlies with different socio-demographic characteristics. To investigate the association between LS and living arrangements and the selected socio-demographic factors multinomial logistic regression model was fitted.
The findings reveal that 25.4% and 45.5% of the elderlies have reported having a low and high level of LS, respectively. Living alone was associated with low level of LS. Co-residing with a spouse was associated with a higher likelihood of reporting high level of LS. The study also found that having both spouse and children as coresident increases the likelihood of reporting high level of LS (RRR = 3.15, 95%CI = 2.3-4.28). Elderly with self-reported poor health, limitation in more than two activities of daily living and presence of depressive symptoms were significantly associated with reporting low level of LS. However, being diagnosed with more than three chronic illnesses was associated with high level of LS (RRR = 1.41, 95%CI = 1.25-1.59). Older adults with the following characteristics were more likely to report a lower level of LS: male, 60-64 years old, no or few years of schooling, unmarried, working, rural resident, living in a poor household, Scheduled Caste and Tribe.
The level of life satisfaction in Indian older adults is significantly associated with their living arrangements, thus suggesting that the LS of older adults could be facilitated through interventions that consider their living arrangements. Older adults with various personal and household characteristics were identified as vulnerable groups, who should be the prime targets of the existing welfare policies.
本文旨在考察印度老年人的生活满意度水平,并确定其居住安排是否是其生活满意度水平的潜在决定因素之一。
数据来自于 2017-18 年进行的印度首次和最新一轮纵向老龄化研究。使用生活满意度量表,评估了 30370 名 60 岁及以上老年人的生活满意度水平。进行了单变量分析,以观察不同社会人口特征的老年人生活满意度水平的变化。为了研究生活安排与生活满意度之间的关系以及与选定的社会人口因素之间的关系,拟合了多分类逻辑回归模型。
研究结果显示,25.4%和 45.5%的老年人报告生活满意度水平较低和较高,分别。独居与生活满意度水平较低有关。与配偶共同居住与报告生活满意度水平较高的可能性较高有关。研究还发现,与配偶和子女共同居住会增加报告生活满意度水平较高的可能性(RRR=3.15,95%CI=2.3-4.28)。自我报告健康状况较差、日常生活活动受限超过两项以及存在抑郁症状的老年人与报告生活满意度水平较低显著相关。然而,被诊断出患有三种以上慢性疾病与生活满意度水平较高有关(RRR=1.41,95%CI=1.25-1.59)。具有以下特征的老年人更有可能报告较低的生活满意度:男性,60-64 岁,受教育年限较少或没有,未婚,有工作,农村居民,生活在贫困家庭,在册种姓和在册部落。
印度老年人的生活满意度水平与他们的居住安排显著相关,这表明可以通过考虑老年人居住安排的干预措施来提高他们的生活满意度。具有各种个人和家庭特征的老年人被确定为弱势群体,应成为现有福利政策的主要目标人群。