Starke Sebastian, Zwanenburg Alexander, Leger Karoline, Zöphel Klaus, Kotzerke Jörg, Krause Mechthild, Baumann Michael, Troost Esther G C, Löck Steffen
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Department of Information Services and Computing, 01328 Dresden, Germany.
OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;15(3):673. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030673.
Radiomics analysis provides a promising avenue towards the enabling of personalized radiotherapy. Most frequently, prognostic radiomics models are based on features extracted from medical images that are acquired before treatment. Here, we investigate whether combining data from multiple timepoints during treatment and from multiple imaging modalities can improve the predictive ability of radiomics models. We extracted radiomics features from computed tomography (CT) images acquired before treatment as well as two and three weeks after the start of radiochemotherapy for 55 patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Additionally, we obtained features from FDG-PET images taken before treatment and three weeks after the start of therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were then built based on features of the different image modalities, treatment timepoints, and combinations thereof using two different feature selection methods in a five-fold cross-validation approach. Based on the cross-validation results, feature signatures were derived and their performance was independently validated. Discrimination regarding loco-regional control was assessed by the concordance index (C-index) and log-rank tests were performed to assess risk stratification. The best prognostic performance was obtained for timepoints during treatment for all modalities. Overall, CT was the best discriminating modality with an independent validation C-index of 0.78 for week two and weeks two and three combined. However, none of these models achieved statistically significant patient stratification. Models based on FDG-PET features from week three provided both satisfactory discrimination (C-index = 0.61 and 0.64) and statistically significant stratification (p=0.044 and p<0.001), but produced highly imbalanced risk groups. After independent validation on larger datasets, the value of (multimodal) radiomics models combining several imaging timepoints should be prospectively assessed for personalized treatment strategies.
放射组学分析为实现个性化放疗提供了一条很有前景的途径。最常见的情况是,预后放射组学模型基于从治疗前获取的医学图像中提取的特征。在此,我们研究在治疗期间多个时间点以及多种成像模态的数据相结合是否能提高放射组学模型的预测能力。我们从55例局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者治疗前以及放化疗开始后两周和三周获取的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像中提取了放射组学特征。此外,我们还从治疗前和治疗开始后三周获取的FDG - PET图像中提取了特征。然后,使用两种不同的特征选择方法,通过五折交叉验证方法,基于不同图像模态、治疗时间点及其组合的特征构建Cox比例风险模型。根据交叉验证结果,得出特征签名并对其性能进行独立验证。通过一致性指数(C指数)评估局部区域控制的辨别能力,并进行对数秩检验以评估风险分层。所有模态在治疗期间的时间点获得了最佳的预后性能。总体而言,CT是最佳辨别模态,在独立验证中,第二周以及第二周和第三周组合的C指数为0.78。然而,这些模型均未实现具有统计学意义的患者分层。基于第三周FDG - PET特征的模型既提供了令人满意的辨别能力(C指数分别为0.61和0.64),又实现了具有统计学意义的分层(p = 0.044和p < 0.001),但产生了高度不平衡的风险组。在更大数据集上进行独立验证后,应前瞻性评估结合多个成像时间点的(多模态)放射组学模型在个性化治疗策略中的价值。