• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试地点和样本数量对杏仁饮料和纯素拉面产品喜好度评分的影响。

Effects of Test Location and Sample Number on the Liking Ratings of Almond Beverage and Vegan Ramen Products.

作者信息

Yoon Jae-Yeon, Kwak Han-Sub, Kim Mi-Ran, Chung Seo-Jin

机构信息

Department of Nutritional Science and Food Management, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.

Food Processing Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju-gun 55465, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Foods. 2023 Feb 2;12(3):632. doi: 10.3390/foods12030632.

DOI:10.3390/foods12030632
PMID:36766160
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9913968/
Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of the evaluation environment and sample number on liking ratings within the same testing session. It comprised two experiments that determined consumer taste ratings of the following food products: (1) almond beverage and (2) vegan ramen, as rated by 322 and 287 Korean consumers, respectively. Consumers tasted each food product under either laboratory or home-used test conditions. Additionally, three levels of sample numbers were established for evaluation (almond beverage test: 1, 2, and 4; vegan ramen test: 1, 3, and 5) in each test condition. A target sample was selected for each of the two food products to directly ascertain the effects of the evaluation environment and sample number on the liking ratings. The results revealed that during the same evaluation session, the sample number affected the liking ratings of the target sample more than the testing location. Moreover, the sample number effect was product item dependent, that is, no significant change was noted in the liking ratings of the target almond beverage sample according to sample number, whereas significant differences were observed in the liking ratings of the target vegan ramen sample. Furthermore, the sample number effect was more prominent under laboratory test conditions than under home-used test conditions probably due to the serving order effect driven by hedonic contrast, carry over effect, and sensory specific satiety. The findings demonstrate that home-used tests should be recommended over laboratory tests when measuring the liking of a small number of multiple sample food items with high flavor complexity.

摘要

本研究调查了在同一测试环节中评估环境和样本数量对喜好评分的影响。该研究包含两个实验,分别测定了以下食品的消费者口味评分:(1)杏仁饮料和(2)素食拉面,参与评分的韩国消费者分别有322名和287名。消费者在实验室或家用测试条件下品尝每种食品。此外,在每种测试条件下,为评估设定了三个样本数量水平(杏仁饮料测试:1、2和4;素食拉面测试:1、3和5)。为这两种食品各自选择了一个目标样本,以直接确定评估环境和样本数量对喜好评分的影响。结果显示,在同一评估环节中,样本数量对目标样本喜好评分的影响大于测试地点。此外,样本数量效应因产品项目而异,也就是说,目标杏仁饮料样本的喜好评分未随样本数量出现显著变化,而目标素食拉面样本的喜好评分则存在显著差异。此外,样本数量效应在实验室测试条件下比在家用测试条件下更为突出,这可能是由于享乐对比、遗留效应和感官特异性饱腹感所驱动的服务顺序效应。研究结果表明,在测量具有高风味复杂性的少量多样本食品的喜好时,应推荐采用家用测试而非实验室测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/1df273f566ae/foods-12-00632-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/987e493b4900/foods-12-00632-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/0e3252054d5c/foods-12-00632-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/a316f7d0da0e/foods-12-00632-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/f047b996d05e/foods-12-00632-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/7a3e7f7cd595/foods-12-00632-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/ae41165489da/foods-12-00632-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/1df273f566ae/foods-12-00632-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/987e493b4900/foods-12-00632-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/0e3252054d5c/foods-12-00632-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/a316f7d0da0e/foods-12-00632-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/f047b996d05e/foods-12-00632-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/7a3e7f7cd595/foods-12-00632-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/ae41165489da/foods-12-00632-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54f/9913968/1df273f566ae/foods-12-00632-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Test Location and Sample Number on the Liking Ratings of Almond Beverage and Vegan Ramen Products.测试地点和样本数量对杏仁饮料和纯素拉面产品喜好度评分的影响。
Foods. 2023 Feb 2;12(3):632. doi: 10.3390/foods12030632.
2
Impacts of Utensil Conditions on Consumer Perception and Acceptance of Food Samples Evaluated under In-Home Testing during the COVID-19 Pandemic.餐具条件对新冠疫情期间居家测试中食品样本消费者认知及接受度的影响
Foods. 2023 Feb 21;12(5):914. doi: 10.3390/foods12050914.
3
Context effect of environmental setting and product information in acceptability testing of tea and cola: A study comparing sensory engagement in a traditional sensory booth and a study commons.环境设置和产品信息对茶和可乐可理解性测试的影响:在传统感官测试亭和学习交流室中比较感官参与度的研究
J Food Sci. 2021 Jun;86(6):2640-2654. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15771. Epub 2021 May 30.
4
Hedonic plasticity of vegan burger patty in implicit or explicit reference frame conditions.在隐式或显式参照系条件下纯素汉堡肉饼的享乐可塑性。
J Sci Food Agric. 2023 Mar 30;103(5):2641-2652. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12362. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
5
Comparison of a central location test versus a home usage test for consumer perception of ready-to-mix protein beverages.消费者对预混蛋白饮料的感知的中心位置测试与家庭使用测试的比较。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3107-3124. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17260. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
The effect of branding on consumer palatability ratings of beef strip loin steaks.品牌对牛柳排消费者适口性评分的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2016 Nov;94(11):4930-4942. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016-0893.
7
On the validity of longitudinal comparisons of central location consumer testing results prior to COVID-19 versus home use testing data during the pandemic.关于新冠疫情前与疫情期间家庭使用测试数据相比,中心位置消费者测试结果的纵向比较的有效性。
J Food Sci. 2021 Oct;86(10):4668-4677. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15905. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
8
Determination of the effect of brand and product identification on consumer palatability ratings of ground beef patties.品牌和产品标识对牛肉饼消费者适口性评分影响的测定。
J Anim Sci. 2016 Nov;94(11):4943-4958. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016-0894.
9
Consumer concerns and expectations about novel food processing technologies: effects on product liking.消费者对新型食品加工技术的担忧与期望:对产品喜好度的影响。
Appetite. 2003 Jun;40(3):217-33. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00008-4.
10
Preference mapping of lemon lime carbonated beverages with regular and diet beverage consumers.常温和低糖柠檬碳酸饮料消费者的偏好映射。
J Food Sci. 2013 Feb;78(2):S320-8. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12028. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumer Acceptance of Texture-Modified Mackerel Stew Products in Older Adults.老年人对质地改良鲭鱼汤产品的消费者接受度
Foods. 2023 Nov 7;12(22):4049. doi: 10.3390/foods12224049.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations in consumer acceptance, sensory engagement and method practicality across three remote consumer-testing modalities.三种远程消费者测试方式在消费者接受度、感官参与度和方法实用性方面的差异。
Food Qual Prefer. 2022 Sep;100:104616. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104616. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Remote testing: Sensory test during Covid-19 pandemic and beyond.远程测试:新冠疫情期间及之后的感官测试。
Food Qual Prefer. 2022 Mar;96:104437. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104437. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
3
On the validity of longitudinal comparisons of central location consumer testing results prior to COVID-19 versus home use testing data during the pandemic.
关于新冠疫情前与疫情期间家庭使用测试数据相比,中心位置消费者测试结果的纵向比较的有效性。
J Food Sci. 2021 Oct;86(10):4668-4677. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15905. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
4
Comparison of a central location test versus a home usage test for consumer perception of ready-to-mix protein beverages.消费者对预混蛋白饮料的感知的中心位置测试与家庭使用测试的比较。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3107-3124. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17260. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
The effect of the research setting on the emotional and sensory profiling under blind, expected, and informed conditions: A study on premium and private label yogurt products.研究环境对盲测、预期和知情条件下情感与感官剖析的影响:关于优质和自有品牌酸奶产品的研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jan;100(1):169-186. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11495. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
6
A comparison between liking ratings obtained under laboratory and field conditions: the role of choice.实验室条件与现场条件下获得的喜好评分比较:选择的作用。
Appetite. 2005 Feb;44(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2003.06.002. Epub 2004 Dec 2.
7
Long-term acceptability of limited diets.有限饮食的长期可接受性。
Life Support Biosph Sci. 1999;6(1):29-33.
8
Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance.饮食环境对食物接受度影响的演示。
Appetite. 2000 Dec;35(3):231-7. doi: 10.1006/appe.2000.0360.
9
Sensory-specific satiety: comparison of taste and texture effects.特定感觉饱腹感:味觉与质地效应的比较
Appetite. 1998 Oct;31(2):141-57. doi: 10.1006/appe.1998.0159.
10
Influence of label and location of testing on acceptability of cream cheese varying in fat content.标签及测试位置对不同脂肪含量奶油芝士可接受性的影响。
Appetite. 1995 Apr;24(2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(95)99313-4.