Basile Angelo, Napoli Ettore, Brianti Emanuele, Venco Luigi
Centro Nefrologico Veterinario, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, Italy.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 26;13(3):418. doi: 10.3390/ani13030418.
Canine Heartworm Disease (HWD) is mainly a pulmonary vascular disease. The reduction of the Pulmonary Artery Distensibility (PAD) is an early index of pulmonary vascular disease. Echocardiographic evaluation of the Right Pulmonary Artery Distensibility index (RPADi) is calculated as the percentage change in diameter of the right pulmonary artery (RPA) between systole and diastole. Historically, two main methods have been used for RPADi calculation: The Venco method and Visser method; however, different hybrid methods have also been used by other authors. Therefore, it could be difficult for a clinician to decide which method to apply and how to interpret the results based on the reference values reported. The aim of this study was to compare the RPADi obtained by five different techniques (Venco classic, Venco modified, Visser classic, Visser modified 1, and Visser modified 2). The study design was a retrospective, single center, observational study. Forty-seven client-owned dogs were included. The measurements were performed off-line as an average of three consecutive cardiac cycles by a single investigator blinded to the dogs' diagnosis. The RPADi was satisfactorily obtained by all methods in all dogs. Intra-observer measurement variability was clinically acceptable both for systolic and diastolic measurements. Although the Bland-Altman test showed a statistical agreement between the various methods used to calculate the RPADi, these methods cannot be used interchangeably in a clinical setting. Instead, the measurement method and reference values should always be specified.
犬心丝虫病(HWD)主要是一种肺血管疾病。肺动脉扩张性(PAD)降低是肺血管疾病的早期指标。右肺动脉扩张性指数(RPADi)的超声心动图评估是通过计算收缩期和舒张期之间右肺动脉(RPA)直径的百分比变化得出的。历史上,计算RPADi主要使用两种方法:Venco法和Visser法;然而,其他作者也使用了不同的混合方法。因此,临床医生可能难以决定应用哪种方法以及如何根据报告的参考值解释结果。本研究的目的是比较通过五种不同技术(Venco经典法、Venco改良法、Visser经典法、Visser改良1法和Visser改良2法)获得的RPADi。研究设计为回顾性、单中心观察性研究。纳入了47只宠物犬。测量由一名对犬诊断不知情的单一研究人员离线进行,取连续三个心动周期的平均值。所有犬的所有方法均成功获得RPADi。观察者内测量变异性在收缩期和舒张期测量中在临床上均可接受。虽然Bland-Altman检验显示用于计算RPADi的各种方法之间存在统计学一致性,但这些方法在临床环境中不能互换使用。相反,应始终指定测量方法和参考值。