Klonner Moriz Ettore, Mattaliano Giorgio, Casoria Vincenzo, Vogl Claus, Braun Christina
Clinical Unit for Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Intensive Care Medicine, Vetmeduni Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Southern County Veterinary Specialists, Ringwood BH4 3JW, UK.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 30;13(3):475. doi: 10.3390/ani13030475.
This study aimed to assess the performance, accuracy, precision and repeatability of two single-use airway pressure manometers as a cost-effective alternative for inflation of endotracheal tubes with high-volume, low-pressure cuffs. The manometers were tested in a bench top model against a U-tube manometer. Eighteen units of each device were tested. Three consecutive measurements were performed at pressures of 20, 25 and 30 cmHO each. The mean ± SD of the recorded pressures and maximum deviation from the target pressures were calculated for each device and each target pressure. For device A, the mean ± SD pressures were 19.6 ± 0.7, 23.6 ± 0.8 and 28.3 ± 0.8 cmHO; for device B, the mean ± SD pressures were 19.3 ± 0.6, 24.3 ± 0.9 and 29.2 ± 0.67 cmHO for target pressures of 20, 25 and 30 cmHO, respectively. The bias for device A was -0.4, -1.4, and -1.7 cmHO and for device B, -0.7, -0.7, and -0.8 cmHO for target pressures of 20, 25, and 30 cmHO, respectively. Both devices showed results comparable to those reported for commercial cuff manometers. They represent inexpensive tools that provide clinically sufficient accuracy, precision and repeatability for ETT cuff inflation between pressures of 20 and 30 cmHO.
本研究旨在评估两种一次性气道压力计的性能、准确性、精密度和可重复性,作为一种经济高效的替代方案,用于为高容量、低压袖带的气管内导管充气。在台式模型中,将这些压力计与U型管压力计进行测试。每种设备测试18个单位。在20、25和30 cmH₂O的压力下各进行连续三次测量。计算每种设备和每个目标压力下记录压力的平均值±标准差以及与目标压力的最大偏差。对于设备A,目标压力为20、25和30 cmH₂O时,平均±标准差压力分别为19.6±0.7、23.6±0.8和28.3±0.8 cmH₂O;对于设备B,目标压力为20、25和30 cmH₂O时,平均±标准差压力分别为19.3±0.6、24.3±0.9和29.2±0.67 cmH₂O。设备A的偏差分别为-0.4、-1.4和-1.7 cmH₂O,设备B的偏差分别为-0.7、-0.7和-0.8 cmH₂O,目标压力分别为20、25和30 cmH₂O。两种设备的结果均与商业袖带压力计报告的结果相当。它们是价格低廉的工具,在20至30 cmH₂O的压力范围内为气管内导管袖带充气提供临床上足够的准确性、精密度和可重复性。