Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Center for Dental Medicine, Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 18;20(3):1781. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031781.
In diagnostic accuracy studies, the test of interest is typically applied only once in each patient. This paper illustrates some possibilities that arise when diagnoses are carried out by a sufficiently large number of multiple raters. In a dental study, sixty-one examiners were asked to diagnose 49 tooth areas with different grades of tissue loss (minor, moderate, and advanced) to decide whether dentine was exposed (positive status) or not (negative status). The true status was determined by histology (reference). For each tooth, the rate of correct decisions reflecting the difficulty to diagnose this tooth and the positive rate reflecting the perception of the tooth by the raters was computed. Meta-analytical techniques were used to assess the inter-tooth variation and the influence of tooth-specific factors on difficulty or perception, respectively. A huge variation in diagnostic difficulty and perception could be observed. Advanced tissue loss made diagnoses more difficult. The background colour and tissue loss were associated with perception and may hint to cues used by the raters. The use of multiple raters in a diagnostic accuracy study allows detailed investigations which make it possible to obtain further insights into the decision-making process of the raters.
在诊断准确性研究中,通常在每个患者中仅应用一次感兴趣的测试。本文说明了在进行诊断时,如果有足够数量的多位评分者进行诊断,可能会出现的一些情况。在一项牙科研究中,六十一名检查者被要求诊断 49 个牙齿区域,这些区域的组织损失程度不同(轻度、中度和重度),以确定牙本质是否暴露(阳性状态)或未暴露(阴性状态)。真实状态由组织学(参考标准)确定。对于每个牙齿,计算反映诊断此牙齿难度的正确决策率和反映评分者对牙齿感知的阳性率。使用荟萃分析技术分别评估牙齿间的变异性以及牙齿特定因素对难度或感知的影响。可以观察到诊断难度和感知的巨大变异性。严重的组织损失使诊断更加困难。背景颜色和组织损失与感知有关,可能提示评分者使用的线索。在诊断准确性研究中使用多位评分者可以进行详细的调查,从而有可能进一步深入了解评分者的决策过程。