Moidu Navas P, Sharma Sidhartha, Chawla Amrita, Kumar Vijay, Logani Ajay
Division of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No 313, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):651-658. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04043-y. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
The study aimed to apply convolutional neural network (CNN) to score periapical lesion on an intraoral periapical radiograph (IOPAR) based on the periapical index (PAI) scoring system.
A total of 3000 periapical root areas (PRA) on 1950 digital IOPAR were pre-scored by three endodontists. This data was used to train the CNN model-"YOLO version 3." A total of 450 PRA was used for validation of the model. Data augmentation techniques and model optimization were applied. A total of 540 PRA on 250 digital IOPAR was used to test the performance of the CNN model.
A total of 303 PRA (56.11%) exhibited true prediction. PAI score 1 showed the highest true prediction (90.9%). PAI scores 2 and 5 exhibited the least true prediction (30% each). PAI scores 3 and 4 had a true prediction of 60% and 71%, respectively. When the scores were dichotomized as healthy (PAI scores 1 and 2) and diseased (PAI score 3, 4, and 5), the model achieved a true prediction of 76.6% and 92%, respectively. The model exhibited a 92.1% sensitivity/recall, 76% specificity, 86.4% positive predictive value/precision, and 86.1% negative predictive value. The accuracy, F1 score, and Matthews correlation coefficient were 86.3%, 0.89, and 0.71, respectively.
The CNN model trained on a limited amount of IOPAR data showed potential for PAI scoring of the periapical lesion on digital IOPAR.
An automated system for PAI scoring is developed that would potentially benefit clinician and researchers.
本研究旨在应用卷积神经网络(CNN)基于根尖指数(PAI)评分系统对口腔根尖片(IOPAR)上的根尖周病变进行评分。
由三位牙髓病医生对1950张数字化IOPAR上的总共3000个根尖根区(PRA)进行预评分。该数据用于训练CNN模型——“YOLO v3版本”。总共450个PRA用于模型验证。应用了数据增强技术和模型优化。在250张数字化IOPAR上的总共540个PRA用于测试CNN模型的性能。
总共303个PRA(56.11%)显示出正确预测。PAI评分为1时显示出最高的正确预测率(90.9%)。PAI评分为2和5时显示出最低的正确预测率(均为30%)。PAI评分为3和4时的正确预测率分别为60%和71%。当将评分分为健康(PAI评分为1和2)和患病(PAI评分为3、4和5)两类时,该模型的正确预测率分别为76.6%和92%。该模型的灵敏度/召回率为92.1%,特异度为76%,阳性预测值/精确率为86.4%,阴性预测值为86.1%。准确率、F1分数和马修斯相关系数分别为86.3%、0.89和0.71。
在有限数量的IOPAR数据上训练的CNN模型显示出对数字化IOPAR上根尖周病变进行PAI评分的潜力。
开发了一种用于PAI评分的自动化系统,这可能会使临床医生和研究人员受益。