Department of Sociology and Social Work, Minzu University of China, No. 27 Zhongguancun S St, Haidian, Beijing 100081, China.
Department of Social Sciences, University of Eastern Finland; Yliopistonranta 1, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031906.
The social work profession has been exploring nonpharmacological interventions for patients with cognitive impairment, but there are few evidence-based research outputs. Systematically evaluating the effectiveness of social work interventions for people with cognitive impairment can shed light on the matter to further improve similar interventions. Randomized controlled trials of nonpharmacological interventions for patients with cognitive impairment were selected from key literature databases in both English and Chinese from 2010 to 2021. A systematic review and meta-analysis with Revman 5.4 were performed. Seven trials were included, involving 851 patients with cognitive impairment. The meta-analysis showed that, in terms of overall cognitive function, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (MD = 1.64, 95% CI [0.97, 2.30], < 0.001) of the intervention group was superior to the control group, but there was no significant difference in the Mini-Mental State Examination score between the two groups (MD = 0.33, 95% CI [-0.16, 0.82], = 0.18). Compared with the control group, nonpharmacological intervention can effectively improve the neuropsychiatric condition of patients (SMD = -0.42, 95% CI [-0.64, -0.20], = 0.0002). In summary, the current evidence shows that nonpharmacological social work interventions had a positive effect on the cognitive function and neuropsychiatric status of patients with cognitive impairment. Suggestions for future nonpharmacological intervention practice are discussed.
社会工作专业一直在探索针对认知障碍患者的非药物干预措施,但基于证据的研究成果较少。系统评估针对认知障碍患者的社会工作干预措施的有效性,可以为进一步改进类似干预措施提供参考。从 2010 年至 2021 年,我们在中英文关键文献数据库中选择了针对认知障碍患者的非药物干预措施的随机对照试验。采用 Revman 5.4 进行系统评价和荟萃分析。共纳入 7 项试验,涉及 851 名认知障碍患者。荟萃分析结果显示,在总体认知功能方面,干预组的蒙特利尔认知评估量表评分(MD=1.64,95%CI[0.97,2.30], < 0.001)优于对照组,但两组间简易精神状态检查量表评分无显著差异(MD=0.33,95%CI[-0.16,0.82], = 0.18)。与对照组相比,非药物干预能有效改善患者的神经精神状况(SMD=-0.42,95%CI[-0.64,-0.20], = 0.0002)。综上所述,目前的证据表明,非药物性的社会工作干预措施对认知障碍患者的认知功能和神经精神状况有积极影响。讨论了对未来非药物干预实践的建议。