Department of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.
Faculty of Physiotherapy, Parul University, Vadodara 391760, Gujarat, India.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031932.
Assessment of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) has become widely accepted and reported in the literature. The objectives of this study are to (1) recognize and describe the topmost 50 cited scientific articles in WMSDs using the RULA and NMQ and (2) explore the factors that contribute to making an article influential. In this bibliometric study, we used the Web of Science and MEDLINE databases to identify the top 50 cited articles published from 1993 to 2022. The data collected were the title of the journal, number of citations, year of publication, type of the study, institution where the work was conducted, level of evidence, contribution of primary authors, and country of origin of the work. Our results showed that the top 50 cited articles were published between 1980 and 2010. The 2000s was the most valuable decade. Regarding journals, the Work journal had the highest number of articles concerning the use of RULA and NMQ in healthcare professionals. The maximum number of citations regarding RULA occurred in the Journal of Robotic Surgery ( = 50) and the maximum for NMQ occurred in the Journal of Safety Research ( = 106). Most articles originated from the United States, followed by England and the Netherlands. Eight authors had two publications published in the top 50 list. The majority of the topmost cited research articles were cross-sectional studies. Most of these studies were level III evidence. The bibliometric analysis from this study provides insights to researchers to choose the most appropriate and influential journal for submitting work on WMSDs.
使用快速上肢评估(RULA)和北欧肌肉骨骼问卷(NMQ)评估与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSDs)已在文献中得到广泛认可和报道。本研究的目的是:(1)识别和描述使用 RULA 和 NMQ 评估 WMSDs 的前 50 篇被引最多的科学文章;(2)探讨使文章具有影响力的因素。在这项文献计量学研究中,我们使用了 Web of Science 和 MEDLINE 数据库,从 1993 年到 2022 年确定了前 50 篇被引最多的文章。收集的数据包括期刊标题、引用次数、出版年份、研究类型、工作开展的机构、证据水平、主要作者的贡献以及工作的原产国。我们的研究结果表明,前 50 篇被引文章发表于 1980 年至 2010 年之间。21 世纪 00 年代是最有价值的十年。就期刊而言,《Work》杂志发表了最多关于医疗保健专业人员使用 RULA 和 NMQ 的文章。关于 RULA 的引用次数最多的文章出现在《机器人外科学杂志》(=50),而关于 NMQ 的引用次数最多的文章出现在《安全研究杂志》(=106)。大多数文章来自美国,其次是英国和荷兰。有 8 位作者的两篇文章进入了前 50 名。大多数被引最多的研究文章是横断面研究。这些研究大多为 III 级证据。本研究的文献计量分析为研究人员提供了见解,以选择最合适和最有影响力的期刊来提交 WMSDs 的工作。