Kyung Minjung, Lee Soo-Jeong, Wagner Laura M, Hong OiSaeng
College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Mar 17;8:100317. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100317. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Although many patient handling activities require use of lifting devices and assistance from coworkers to ensure safety and efficiency, integrating these practices into the workplace remains challenging.
The objectives of this study were to examine the association of musculoskeletal symptoms with the use of patient -handling devices or coworker assistance and to identify factors associated with their adoption among direct care workers in long-term care facilities.
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 376 direct care workers recruited from 19 long-term care facilities in South Korea. Chi-square tests and analysis of variance with Tukey post-hoc analysis were used to assess differences in musculoskeletal symptom prevalence, frequency, and severity by patient handling methods. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between the use of coworker assistance or patient -handling devices and demographic, job-related, physical, and psychosocial work factors and perception of management's safety priority.
The majority of participants were female, married, and employed in non-permanent positions. Among the participants, 42.2% used both patient- handling devices and coworker assistance, 5.8 % used only patient- handling devices, 24.7 % used only coworker assistance, and 27.3 % used neither method. Workers who used both methods reported a significantly lower prevalence, frequency, and severity of musculoskeletal symptoms compared to those who relied on only one method or neither. Older and immigrant workers were less likely to use patient- handling devices. While workers perceiving management having a high priority for safety were more likely to use coworker assistance, immigrant, non-permanent, and overcommitted workers and those with longer years in long-term care showed lower tendencies to seek coworker assistance.
Despite the musculoskeletal benefits of using patient- handling devices and coworker assistance, their availability and adoption remain insufficient in long-term care facilities in Korea. These findings underscore the vital role that nursing leaders may play in promoting the adoption of combined patient handling methods, particularly among vulnerable worker groups. Empowerment strategies, such as fostering a supportive work environment and addressing barriers faced by overcommitted, long-tenured, and marginalized workers, may be essential to improving the safety and well-being of both patients and staff in long-term care settings.
尽管许多患者搬运活动需要使用搬运设备并借助同事的帮助以确保安全和效率,但将这些做法融入工作场所仍然具有挑战性。
本研究的目的是检查肌肉骨骼症状与使用患者搬运设备或同事协助之间的关联,并确定长期护理机构中直接护理人员采用这些措施的相关因素。
对从韩国19家长期护理机构招募的376名直接护理人员进行了横断面研究。使用卡方检验和方差分析以及Tukey事后分析来评估不同患者搬运方法在肌肉骨骼症状患病率、频率和严重程度方面的差异。采用多元逻辑回归分析来研究同事协助或患者搬运设备的使用与人口统计学、工作相关、身体和心理社会工作因素以及对管理层安全优先事项的认知之间的关系。
大多数参与者为女性、已婚,且从事非长期职位。在参与者中,42.2%的人同时使用患者搬运设备和同事协助,5.8%的人仅使用患者搬运设备,24.7%的人仅使用同事协助,27.3%的人两种方法都不使用。与仅依赖一种方法或两种方法都不使用的人相比,同时使用两种方法的工作人员报告的肌肉骨骼症状患病率、频率和严重程度明显更低。年龄较大的工人和移民工人使用患者搬运设备的可能性较小。虽然认为管理层高度重视安全的工人更有可能寻求同事协助,但移民、非长期、工作负担过重的工人以及在长期护理机构工作年限较长的工人寻求同事协助的倾向较低。
尽管使用患者搬运设备和同事协助对肌肉骨骼有益,但在韩国的长期护理机构中,它们的可用性和采用率仍然不足。这些发现强调了护理领导者在促进采用联合患者搬运方法方面可能发挥的重要作用,特别是在弱势工人群体中。赋能策略,如营造支持性的工作环境以及解决工作负担过重、工作年限长和边缘化工人所面临的障碍,对于改善长期护理环境中患者和工作人员的安全与福祉可能至关重要。