• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反应电抗、决策拖延和犹豫:杂乱行为的潜在类别分析。

Reactance, Decisional Procrastination, and Hesitation: A Latent Class Analysis of Clutter Behavior.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, College of Science and Health, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;20(3):2061. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032061.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032061
PMID:36767429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9915205/
Abstract

During the 2019-2020 global pandemic, mandated time at home suggested engagement in personal projects, such as home decluttering. Clutter (an overabundance of possessions) may impede one's quality of life by interfering with space livability and social connections and prompting negative affect and financial problems. The present study explored action-state orientation, psychological reactance, and decisional procrastination with 227 American adults ( age = 49.9 years old). A latent class analysis tested for differences in cognition across groups. Results supported that persons who struggle with clutter reflect clusters or "classes" given their self-reported cognitive processes, with hesitant and indecisive participants experiencing greater negative impacts of clutter than action-oriented and decisive participants. Our findings suggested improving the decision-making and goal-directed capacities of those struggling with clutter may be effective as preventive and/or interventive strategies. Future research might consider when hesitation to initiate challenging tasks and indecision emerge in the decluttering timeline and how those who are prone to these cognitions may be supported in managing their personal possessions.

摘要

在 2019-2020 年的全球大流行期间,强制居家时间建议人们从事个人项目,如家庭杂物清理。杂物(过多的物品)可能会通过干扰空间宜居性和社会联系,以及引发负面情绪和财务问题,从而影响生活质量。本研究调查了行动状态取向、心理抗拒和决策拖延在 227 名美国成年人(年龄=49.9 岁)中的作用。潜在类别分析测试了不同认知群体的差异。结果表明,那些与杂物作斗争的人反映了他们自我报告的认知过程的聚类或“类别”,犹豫和优柔寡断的参与者比行动导向和果断的参与者经历了更大的杂物负面影响。我们的发现表明,改善与杂物作斗争的人的决策和目标导向能力可能是有效的预防和/或干预策略。未来的研究可能会考虑在清理时间表中何时出现犹豫开始挑战性任务和犹豫不决的情况,以及如何支持那些容易出现这些认知的人来管理他们的个人财产。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99af/9915205/dbff57b1c6db/ijerph-20-02061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99af/9915205/dbff57b1c6db/ijerph-20-02061-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99af/9915205/dbff57b1c6db/ijerph-20-02061-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Reactance, Decisional Procrastination, and Hesitation: A Latent Class Analysis of Clutter Behavior.反应电抗、决策拖延和犹豫:杂乱行为的潜在类别分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;20(3):2061. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032061.
2
Indecision and avoidant procrastination: the role of morningness-eveningness and time perspective in chronic delay lifestyles.优柔寡断与回避型拖延:晨型-夜型和时间观念在慢性拖延生活方式中的作用
J Gen Psychol. 2008 Jul;135(3):228-40. doi: 10.3200/GENP.135.3.228-240.
3
Decisional, general and online procrastination: Understanding the moderating role of negative affect in the case of computer professionals.决策性拖延、一般性拖延和网络拖延:理解消极情绪在计算机专业人员案例中的调节作用。
J Prev Interv Community. 2018 Jul-Sep;46(3):279-294. doi: 10.1080/10852352.2018.1470421.
4
Procrastination tendencies among obsessive-compulsives and their relatives.强迫症患者及其亲属的拖延倾向。
J Clin Psychol. 1994 Mar;50(2):162-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199403)50:2<162::aid-jclp2270500206>3.0.co;2-z.
5
Young University Students' Academic Self-Regulation Profiles and Their Associated Procrastination: Autonomous Functioning Requires Self-Regulated Operations.青年大学生的学业自我调节概况及其相关的拖延行为:自主运作需要自我调节操作。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 13;11:354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00354. eCollection 2020.
6
Chronic procrastination among Turkish adults: exploring decisional, avoidant, and arousal styles.土耳其成年人中的慢性拖延:探索决策、回避和唤醒风格。
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;149(3):402-8. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.149.3.402-408.
7
Turtle, Task Ninja, or Time Waster? Who Cares? Traditional Task-Completion Strategies Are Overrated.乌龟、任务忍者、还是浪费时间的人?谁在乎呢?传统的任务完成策略已经过时了。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Mar;31(3):306-315. doi: 10.1177/0956797619901267. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
8
Giving in when feeling less good: Procrastination, action control, and social temptations.在感觉不佳时屈服:拖延、行动控制和社会诱惑。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):404-427. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12243. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
9
Decisional Procrastination in Academic Settings: The Role of Metacognitions and Learning Strategies.学术环境中的决策拖延:元认知与学习策略的作用
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 16;8:973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00973. eCollection 2017.
10
Relations Between Student Procrastination and Teaching Styles: Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling.学生拖延与教学风格之间的关系:自主支持型与控制型
Front Psychol. 2018 May 23;9:809. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00809. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Descriptive or injunctive: How do restaurant customers react to the guidelines of COVID-19 prevention measures? The role of psychological reactance.描述性还是指令性:餐厅顾客如何应对新冠疫情防控措施指南?心理抗拒的作用。
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102934. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102934. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
2
Older Adults and Clutter: Age Differences in Clutter Impact, Psychological Home, and Subjective Well-Being.老年人与杂乱:杂乱影响、心理家园和主观幸福感方面的年龄差异
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 May 3;12(5):132. doi: 10.3390/bs12050132.
3
The Impact of Lockdown During the COVID-19 Outbreak on Dietary Habits in Various Population Groups: A Scoping Review.
新冠疫情期间封锁措施对不同人群饮食习惯的影响:一项范围综述
Front Nutr. 2021 Mar 4;8:626432. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.626432. eCollection 2021.
4
From panic to revenge: Compensatory buying behaviors during the pandemic.从恐慌到报复性购买:疫情期间的补偿性购买行为
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;68(4):921-922. doi: 10.1177/00207640211002557. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
5
The need to consume: Hoarding as a shared psychological feature of compulsive buying and binge eating.需要消费:囤积作为强迫性购买和暴食的共同心理特征。
Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;85:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
6
Hoarding disorder has finally arrived, but many challenges lie ahead.囤积障碍终于得到了关注,但前方仍有许多挑战。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):224-225. doi: 10.1002/wps.20531.
7
Understanding Psychological Reactance: New Developments and Findings.理解心理抗拒:新进展与新发现
Z Psychol. 2015;223(4):205-214. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000222.
8
A review of executive function deficits in autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.自闭症谱系障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍执行功能缺陷的综述。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 May 12;12:1191-202. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S104620. eCollection 2016.
9
Rebels with a cause? Adolescent defiance from the perspective of reactance theory and self-determination theory.有原因的叛逆者?从逆反理论和自我决定理论看青少年的反抗行为。
Child Dev. 2015 May-Jun;86(3):903-18. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12355. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
10
Individual Differences in the Context-Dependent Recruitment of Cognitive Control: Evidence From Action Versus State Orientation.情境依赖的认知控制的个体差异:来自行动导向与状态导向的证据。
J Pers. 2015 Oct;83(5):575-83. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12140. Epub 2014 Nov 21.