• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19:急症护理单元护理管理的方案和核对清单。

COVID-19: Protocol and Checklist for Nursing Care Management at Urgent Care Units.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Botucatu Medical School, Paulista State University, Botucatu 18618-687, SP, Brazil.

Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 25;20(3):2169. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032169.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032169
PMID:36767535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9916145/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 24 h urgent care units (24 h UCU) in Brazil are the main pre-admission hospital process of the public healthcare system and constitute an intermediate modality between primary care and hospital care. These units also provide care in cases of less severity that are not considered urgent. This study aimed to create and validate the content of a graphic protocol and checklist for the nursing care management of patients with a suspicion or confirmation of infection by COVID-19 at urgent care units.

METHODS

A methodological study was carried out in three phases: construct of items and dimensions of the checklist; evaluation of the checklist by specialists for content validation; and construct and content validation of the graphic protocol.

RESULTS

The checklist was evaluated by nine specialists. Eight items received suggestions for changes. Items with a content validity index ≥0.83 were maintained. With regard to content validity, despite the satisfactory level of agreement, the specialists suggested some changes in the writing of eight items. The graphic protocol was evaluated by six specialists and had an overall content validity of 0.97.

CONCLUSION

The checklist with 44 items and three dimensions (Management, Biosafety and Care) and the protocol achieved a satisfactory standard of content validity for use at 24 h urgent care units. This protocol can contribute to the standardization and guidance of nursing actions in suspected and confirmed cases of COVID-19 at urgent care units, ensuring safe care based on scientific evidence.

摘要

背景

巴西的 24 小时紧急护理单位(24 小时 UCU)是公共医疗保健系统的主要入院前流程,是初级保健和医院护理之间的中间模式。这些单位还为非紧急但病情较轻的患者提供护理。本研究旨在创建和验证用于管理疑似或确诊感染 COVID-19 的患者的护理管理的图形协议和检查表的内容。

方法

这是一项分三个阶段进行的方法学研究:检查表项目和维度的构建;检查表由专家进行内容验证评估;以及图形协议的构建和内容验证。

结果

检查表由九位专家进行了评估。八项条目收到了更改建议。内容效度指数≥0.83 的项目被保留。关于内容效度,尽管专家们的意见一致程度令人满意,但他们还是建议对八项条目的措辞进行一些修改。六名专家对图形协议进行了评估,其整体内容效度为 0.97。

结论

该检查表有 44 个项目和三个维度(管理、生物安全和护理),以及协议在使用 24 小时紧急护理单位时达到了令人满意的内容有效性标准。该协议可以为紧急护理单位疑似和确诊 COVID-19 患者的护理行动标准化和指导提供帮助,确保基于科学证据的安全护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56e/9916145/492ca1b24396/ijerph-20-02169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56e/9916145/cc0676b55640/ijerph-20-02169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56e/9916145/492ca1b24396/ijerph-20-02169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56e/9916145/cc0676b55640/ijerph-20-02169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f56e/9916145/492ca1b24396/ijerph-20-02169-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19: Protocol and Checklist for Nursing Care Management at Urgent Care Units.COVID-19:急症护理单元护理管理的方案和核对清单。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 25;20(3):2169. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032169.
2
Content validity of a Safe Nursing Care Checklist for a neonatal unit.新生儿病房安全护理检查表的内容效度。
Nurs Crit Care. 2023 Mar;28(2):307-321. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12831. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
3
Development of a Discharge Criteria Checklist for COVID-19 Patients From the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房新冠患者出院标准清单的制定
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2023;46(2):227-238. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000455.
4
The Standardized Pressure Injury Prevention Protocol (SPIPP) Checklist 2.0: Content validation.《标准化压力性损伤预防方案(SPIPP)检查表 2.0:内容验证》
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jun;80(6):2584-2591. doi: 10.1111/jan.15964. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
5
Construction and content validation of checklist for patient safety in emergency care.急诊护理患者安全检查表的构建与内容效度验证
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2017 Jun 5;37(spe):e68778. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2016.esp.68778.
6
Checklist validation for care provided to patients in the immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery.心脏手术后即刻患者护理提供检查表验证。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):4171-4179. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15446. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
7
Elaboration and validation of a protocol for the care of patients with COVID-19 in hemodialysis centers.
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2022 May 23;43:e20200399. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2022.20200399.en. eCollection 2022.
8
Creation and content validity of a scale for assessing adherence to good practices for COVID-19.评估 COVID-19 良好实践依从性的量表的编制和内容效度。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Jul 29;75(5):e20210223. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0223. eCollection 2022.
9
A Pediatric Intensive Care Checklist for Interprofessional Rounds: The R-PICniC Study.一份用于跨专业查房的儿科重症监护检查表:R-PICniC研究。
Am J Crit Care. 2022 Sep 1;31(5):383-389. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2022533.
10
Nursing care with surgical arteriovenous shunt in renal dialysis: a validation study.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(6):e20190012. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0012. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Case Series of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection - United Kingdom and United States, March-August 2020.2020 年 3 月至 8 月,英国和美国出现与 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关的成人多系统炎症综合征病例系列。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 9;69(40):1450-1456. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6940e1.
2
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
3
The process of implementation of emergency care units in Brazil.
巴西急救单元的实施过程。
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Dec 11;51:125. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000072.
4
[Construction of measurement instruments in the area of health].[健康领域测量工具的构建]
Cien Saude Colet. 2015 Mar;20(3):925-36. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232015203.04332013.
5
[Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments].[测量工具开发与改编过程中的内容效度]
Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Jul;16(7):3061-8. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000800006.
6
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.