• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 GGIR R 包开发和评估成人 activPAL 久坐时间切点。

Development and Evaluation of Sedentary Time Cut-Points for the activPAL in Adults Using the GGIR R-Package.

机构信息

Division of Sport and Exercise, School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Lanarkshire Campus, Glasgow G72 0LH, Scotland, UK.

Research Centre for Population Health and Medical Informatics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2293. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032293.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032293
PMID:36767662
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9915298/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop sedentary cut-points for the activPAL and evaluate their performance against a criterion measure (i.e., activPAL processed by PALbatch). Part 1: Thirty-five adults (23.4 ± 3.6 years) completed 12 laboratory activities (6 sedentary and 6 non-sedentary activities). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves proposed optimal Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) cut-points of 26.4 mg (ENMO) and 30.1 mg (MAD). Part 2: Thirty-eight adults (22.6 ± 4.1 years) wore an activPAL during free-living. Estimates from PALbatch and MAD revealed a mean percent error (MPE) of 2.2%, mean absolute percent error (MAPE) of 6.5%, limits of agreement (LoA) of 19% with absolute and relative equivalence zones of 5% and 0.3 SD. Estimates from PALbatch and ENMO revealed an MPE of -10.6%, MAPE of 14.4%, LoA of 31% and 16% and 1 SD equivalence zones. After standing was isolated from sedentary behaviours, ROC analysis proposed an optimal cut-off of 21.9 mg (herein ENMOs). Estimates from PALbatch and ENMOs revealed an MPE of 3.1%, MAPE of 7.5%, LoA of 25% and 9% and 0.5 SD equivalence zones. The MAD and ENMOs cut-points performed best in discriminating between sedentary and non-sedentary activity during free-living.

摘要

本研究旨在为 activPAL 制定久坐行为切点,并评估其与标准测量(即通过 PALbatch 处理的 activPAL)的性能。第 1 部分:35 名成年人(23.4±3.6 岁)完成了 12 项实验室活动(6 项久坐行为和 6 项非久坐行为)。接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线提出了最佳的欧几里得范数减一(ENMO)和平均幅度差(MAD)切点为 26.4mg(ENMO)和 30.1mg(MAD)。第 2 部分:38 名成年人(22.6±4.1 岁)在自由生活期间佩戴 activPAL。来自 PALbatch 和 MAD 的估计值显示平均百分比误差(MPE)为 2.2%,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为 6.5%,一致性界限(LoA)为 19%,绝对和相对等效区为 5%和 0.3SD。来自 PALbatch 和 ENMO 的估计值显示 MPE 为-10.6%,MAPE 为 14.4%,LoA 为 31%和 16%以及 1SD 等效区。在将站立与久坐行为隔离开后,ROC 分析提出了 21.9mg 的最佳截断值(此处为 ENMOs)。来自 PALbatch 和 ENMOs 的估计值显示 MPE 为 3.1%,MAPE 为 7.5%,LoA 为 25%和 9%以及 0.5SD 等效区。MAD 和 ENMOs 切点在区分自由生活中的久坐和非久坐行为方面表现最佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c21/9915298/b506244822a3/ijerph-20-02293-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c21/9915298/c23b4329704b/ijerph-20-02293-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c21/9915298/b506244822a3/ijerph-20-02293-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c21/9915298/c23b4329704b/ijerph-20-02293-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c21/9915298/b506244822a3/ijerph-20-02293-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Evaluation of Sedentary Time Cut-Points for the activPAL in Adults Using the GGIR R-Package.使用 GGIR R 包开发和评估成人 activPAL 久坐时间切点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2293. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032293.
2
Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.原始加速度数据的强度阈值:欧几里得范数减一(ENMO)和平均幅度偏差(MAD)方法。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0164045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164045. eCollection 2016.
3
Evaluation of raw acceleration sedentary thresholds in children and adults.评估儿童和成人的原始加速度静坐阈值。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Dec;27(12):1814-1823. doi: 10.1111/sms.12795. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
4
Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.从佩戴在腕部的 ActiGraph 加速度计在自由生活的成年人中确定活动强度的切点的开发。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Nov;38(22):2569-2578. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1794244. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
5
Cross-generational comparability of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+, wGT3X-BT, and GT9X accelerometers during free-living in adults.两代人在成年人自由生活中使用 Hip 和 Wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X +、wGT3X-BT 和 GT9X 加速度计的可比较性。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Dec;38(24):2794-2802. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1801320. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
6
Comparing the activPAL CREA and GHLA Algorithms for the Classification of Postures and Activity in Free-Living Children.比较 activPAL CREA 和 GHLA 算法在自由活动儿童姿势和活动分类中的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):15962. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315962.
7
Agreement between activPAL and ActiGraph for assessing children's sedentary time.评估儿童久坐时间时 activPAL 与 ActiGraph 的一致性。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Feb 19;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-15.
8
Concurrent validity of the ActiGraph GT3X+ and activPAL for assessing sedentary behaviour in 2-3-year-old children under free-living conditions.在自由生活条件下,评估 2-3 岁儿童久坐行为时 ActiGraph GT3X+ 和 activPAL 的同时效度。
J Sci Med Sport. 2020 Feb;23(2):151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
9
Estimating Sedentary Time from a Hip- and Wrist-Worn Accelerometer.从佩戴在髋部和腕部的加速度计估算久坐时间。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Jan;52(1):225-232. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002099.
10
A Comparison of Sedentary Behavior as Measured by the Fitbit and ActivPAL in College Students.《基于 Fitbit 和 ActivPAL 对大学生久坐行为的比较研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;18(8):3914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083914.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating context-specific sedentary behaviours and cardiometabolic health in college-based young adults (CONTEXT-SB): a protocol for a longitudinal observational study.调查以大学为基础的年轻成年人中特定背景下的久坐行为与心血管代谢健康(CONTEXT-SB):一项纵向观察性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 27;14(12):e096116. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096116.
2
Protocol for a Study Investigating Context-Specific Sedentary Behaviors and Cardiometabolic Health in College-Based Young Adults (CONTEXT-SB).一项针对大学生群体中特定情境久坐行为与心脏代谢健康的研究方案(CONTEXT-SB)
Res Sq. 2024 Jun 11:rs.3.rs-4470004. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4470004/v1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Equivalence of activity outcomes derived from three research grade accelerometers worn simultaneously on each wrist.三个研究级加速度计同时佩戴在每个手腕上所获得的活动结果的等效性。
J Sports Sci. 2022 Apr;40(7):797-807. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.2019429. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
2
Improving the criterion validity of the activPAL in determining physical activity intensity during laboratory and free-living conditions.提高 activPAL 在实验室和自由生活条件下测定身体活动强度的标准效度。
J Sports Sci. 2021 Apr;39(7):826-834. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1847503. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
3
Enhancing the value of accelerometer-assessed physical activity: meaningful visual comparisons of data-driven translational accelerometer metrics.
Relationship between rest-activity rhythms and cardiorespiratory fitness in middle-aged workers: a cross-sectional study with non-parametric analysis using accelerometers worn on the thigh.
中年工作者的静息-活动节律与心肺功能适应性的关系:使用大腿佩戴式加速度计进行的非参数分析的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17580-w.
提升加速度计评估的身体活动的价值:数据驱动的转化加速度计指标的有意义视觉比较。
Sports Med Open. 2019 Dec 5;5(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40798-019-0225-9.
4
Comparability of accelerometer signal aggregation metrics across placements and dominant wrist cut points for the assessment of physical activity in adults.在评估成年人的身体活动时,加速度计信号聚合指标在不同位置和主要手腕切割点的可比性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54267-y.
5
Concurrent agreement between ActiGraph and activPAL in measuring moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity for adults.计步器与 activPAL 测量成年人中等到剧烈强度体力活动的同时一致性。
Med Eng Phys. 2019 Dec;74:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.09.018. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
6
Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis.加速度计测量的体力活动和久坐时间与全因死亡率之间的剂量-反应关系:系统评价和协调荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Aug 21;366:l4570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4570.
7
Differences in objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour between white Europeans and south Asians recruited from primary care: cross-sectional analysis of the PROPELS trial.在初级保健中招募的白种欧洲人和南亚人之间客观测量的体力活动和久坐行为的差异:PROPELS 试验的横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 21;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6341-5.
8
Evaluation of wrist and hip sedentary behaviour and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity raw acceleration cutpoints in older adults.评估老年人腕部和髋部的久坐行为和中高强度体力活动原始加速度切点。
J Sports Sci. 2019 Jun;37(11):1270-1279. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1555904. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
9
Considerations when using the activPAL monitor in field-based research with adult populations.在针对成年人群体的实地研究中使用activPAL监测仪时的注意事项。
J Sport Health Sci. 2017 Jun;6(2):162-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
10
Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis.久坐行为与全因、心血管疾病和癌症死亡率以及 2 型糖尿病发病风险的关系:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;33(9):811-829. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1. Epub 2018 Mar 28.