• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国某县按日付费制度下的成本分担和成本转移机制。

Cost Sharing and Cost Shifting Mechanisms under a per Diem Payment System in a County of China.

机构信息

School of Public Policy & Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Jiyang College, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Zhuji 311800, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032522.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032522
PMID:36767888
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9916538/
Abstract

Cost sharing and cost shifting mechanisms are of vital importance in a prospective payment system. This paper employed the difference-in-differences method to estimate the impacts of a per diem system with inverted-U-shape rates on medical costs and the length of stay based on data from a health insurance institution. The supply side cost sharing mechanism worked so that the new payment system significantly reduced medical costs by 17.59 percent while the average length of stay varied little. After further analyzing the mechanism, we found that heterogeneous effects emerged mainly due to the special rates design. The reform decreased the cases that incurred relatively high medical costs and lengths of stay. However, cost shifting existed so that physicians could be motivated to provide unnecessary services to the patients who should have been discharged before the average length of stay. Therefore, payment rates in the per diem system require a sophisticated design to constrain its distortion to medical service provision even though medical expenditures were successfully contained.

摘要

成本分担和成本转移机制在预付制中至关重要。本文利用双重差分法,基于某医疗保险机构的数据,估计了按天付费制与倒 U 形费率对医疗费用和住院时间的影响。供方成本分担机制使得新的支付系统显著降低了 17.59%的医疗费用,而平均住院时间变化不大。进一步分析该机制后发现,由于特殊费率设计,出现了异质效应。改革减少了那些医疗费用和住院时间相对较高的病例。然而,存在成本转移,因此医生可能会受到激励,为那些本应在平均住院时间之前出院的患者提供不必要的服务。因此,尽管成功地控制了医疗支出,但按天付费制的支付费率需要进行精细设计,以约束其对医疗服务提供的扭曲。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513a/9916538/13cf9342c346/ijerph-20-02522-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513a/9916538/c88dd8d68551/ijerph-20-02522-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513a/9916538/6fa37187102b/ijerph-20-02522-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513a/9916538/0a5e223f64f4/ijerph-20-02522-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513a/9916538/13cf9342c346/ijerph-20-02522-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513a/9916538/c88dd8d68551/ijerph-20-02522-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513a/9916538/6fa37187102b/ijerph-20-02522-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513a/9916538/0a5e223f64f4/ijerph-20-02522-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513a/9916538/13cf9342c346/ijerph-20-02522-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost Sharing and Cost Shifting Mechanisms under a per Diem Payment System in a County of China.中国某县按日付费制度下的成本分担和成本转移机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032522.
2
Medical insurance payment schemes and patient medical expenses: a cross-sectional study of lung cancer patients in urban China.医疗保险支付方式与患者医疗费用:中国城市肺癌患者的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 26;23(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09078-3.
3
Does per-diem reimbursement necessarily increase length of stay? The case of a public psychiatric hospital.按日计费报销是否必然会增加住院时间?一家公立精神病医院的案例。
Health Econ. 2009 Jul;18 Suppl 2:S97-106. doi: 10.1002/hec.1522.
4
Impacts of a new diagnosis-related group point payment system on children's medical services in China: Length of stay and costs.一种新的诊断相关分组点数付费系统对中国儿童医疗服务的影响:住院时长与费用
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2024 Mar;39(2):432-446. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3739. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
5
Effects of Per-diem payment on the duration of hospitalization and medical expenses according to the palliative care demonstration project in Korea.根据韩国姑息治疗示范项目,日薪制支付对住院时长和医疗费用的影响。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Apr;32(2):e206-e217. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2366. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
6
Differential Effects of Declining Rates in a Per Diem Payment System.按日计费支付系统中费率下降的差异效应。
Health Econ. 2016 Dec;25(12):1599-1618. doi: 10.1002/hec.3128. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
7
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational drug use.药品政策:封顶支付和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.
8
Combining DRGs and per diem payments in the private sector: the Equitable Payment Model.私营部门中诊断相关分组(DRGs)与按日付费相结合:公平支付模式。
Aust Health Rev. 2005 Feb;29(1):80-6. doi: 10.1071/ah050080.
9
The Impacts of China's Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance on Healthcare Expenditures and Health Outcomes.中国城镇职工基本医疗保险对医疗支出和健康结果的影响
Health Econ. 2017 Feb;26(2):149-163. doi: 10.1002/hec.3281. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
10
Variation in patient routine costliness in U.S. psychiatric facilities.美国精神病治疗机构中患者常规费用的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Mar;8(1):15-28.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost shifting or cost cutting by hospitals as a response to reimbursement reform? The case of diagnosis-related groups (DRG) scheme in China.医院通过成本转移或成本削减来应对报销改革?以中国的诊断相关分组(DRG)方案为例。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 20;13:1582001. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1582001. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital response to a case-based payment scheme under regional global budget: The case of Guangzhou in China.医院对区域总额预算下按病例支付方案的反应:以中国广州为例。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114601. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114601. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
2
Alternative payment models and physician treatment decisions: Evidence from lower back pain.替代支付模式与医生的治疗决策:来自下腰痛的证据。
J Health Econ. 2021 Dec;80:102548. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102548. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
3
The pilot of a new patient classification-based payment system in China: The impact on costs, length of stay and quality.
中国新型基于患者分类的支付制度试点:对费用、住院时间和质量的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114415. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114415. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
Designing a Successful Primary Care Physician Capitation Model.设计一个成功的基层医疗医生按人头付费模式。
JAMA. 2021 May 25;325(20):2043-2044. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.5133.
5
The effects of DRGs-based payment compared with cost-based payment on inpatient healthcare utilization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于疾病诊断相关分组(DRGs)付费与基于成本付费对住院医疗服务利用的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Health Policy. 2020 Apr;124(4):359-367. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
6
Payment schemes and cost efficiency: evidence from Swiss public hospitals.支付方案与成本效益:来自瑞士公立医院的证据
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015 Mar;15(1):73-97. doi: 10.1007/s10754-014-9159-4. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
7
Differential Effects of Declining Rates in a Per Diem Payment System.按日计费支付系统中费率下降的差异效应。
Health Econ. 2016 Dec;25(12):1599-1618. doi: 10.1002/hec.3128. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
8
Health care cost containment strategies used in four other high-income countries hold lessons for the United States.其他四个高收入国家使用的医疗保健费用控制策略为美国提供了经验教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):643-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1252.
9
Effects of the per diem prospective payment system with DRG-like grouping system (DPC/PDPS) on resource usage and healthcare quality in Japan.按床日付费的疾病诊断相关分组系统(DPC/PDPS)对日本资源使用和医疗质量的影响。
Health Policy. 2012 Oct;107(2-3):194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
10
Supply-side and demand-side cost sharing in deregulated social health insurance: which is more effective?去监管化社会健康保险中的供方和需方成本分担:哪一种更有效?
J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):231-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Nov 2.