• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

其他四个高收入国家使用的医疗保健费用控制策略为美国提供了经验教训。

Health care cost containment strategies used in four other high-income countries hold lessons for the United States.

机构信息

Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Ontario.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):643-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1252.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1252
PMID:23569043
Abstract

Around the world, rising health care costs are claiming a larger share of national budgets. This article reviews strategies developed to contain costs in health systems in Canada, England, France, and Germany in 2000-10. We used a comprehensive analysis of health systems and reforms in each country, compiled by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. These countries rely on a number of budget and price-setting mechanisms to contain health care costs. Our review revealed trends in all four countries toward more use of technology assessments and payment based on diagnosis-related groups and the value of products or services. These policies may result in a more efficient use of health care resources, but we argue that they need to be combined with volume and price controls--measures unlikely to be adopted in the United States--if they are also to meet cost containment goals.

摘要

在全球范围内,不断上涨的医疗保健成本正在占据国家预算的更大份额。本文回顾了 2000-2010 年期间加拿大、英国、法国和德国为控制医疗体系成本而制定的策略。我们使用了欧洲卫生系统和政策观察站(European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies)编制的关于每个国家卫生系统和改革的综合分析。这些国家依赖于一系列预算和价格设定机制来控制医疗保健成本。我们的审查揭示了这四个国家在更多地使用技术评估以及基于诊断相关组和产品或服务价值的支付方式方面的趋势。这些政策可能会导致更有效地利用医疗保健资源,但我们认为,如果这些政策也要达到控制成本的目标,那么还需要结合数量和价格控制——这在美国是不太可能采取的措施。

相似文献

1
Health care cost containment strategies used in four other high-income countries hold lessons for the United States.其他四个高收入国家使用的医疗保健费用控制策略为美国提供了经验教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):643-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1252.
2
What can the Canadians and Americans learn from each other's health care systems?加拿大人和美国人可以从彼此的医疗保健系统中学到什么?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016 Jul;31(3):349-70. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2374. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
3
Washington Brings Renewed Focus to Payment Models of the Future.华盛顿重新聚焦未来支付模式。
Radiol Manage. 2016 May-Jun;38(3):10-1.
4
Cost containment mechanisms in Canada.加拿大的成本控制机制。
Croat Med J. 1999 Jun;40(2):287-93.
5
Policy options to contain healthcare costs: a review and classification.控制医疗成本的政策选择:综述与分类
Health Policy. 2016 May;120(5):486-94. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
6
Lessons from the eight countries.来自八个国家的经验教训。
Health Policy. 1994 Oct-Dec;30(1-3):397-421. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(94)00691-7.
7
Health care reform and global budgeting.医疗保健改革与全球预算编制。
Med Staff Couns. 1993 Summer;7(3):35-49.
8
Common Pharmaceutical Price and Cost Controls in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany: Lessons for the United States.英国、法国和德国的常见药品价格和成本控制措施:对美国的启示。
Int J Health Serv. 2021 Jul;51(3):379-391. doi: 10.1177/0020731421996168. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
9
Preparing primary care for the future - perspectives from the Netherlands, England, and USA.为未来的初级医疗保健做准备——来自荷兰、英国和美国的观点。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(8):571-80. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.09.029. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
10
Assessment of the effectiveness of supply-side cost-containment measures.评估供应方成本控制措施的有效性。
Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl. 1991:13-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Turkish pharmaceutical pricing strategies an access barrier to oncology medicines for Türkiye?土耳其的药品定价策略是否成为土耳其肿瘤药物可及性的障碍?
Front Pharmacol. 2024 May 10;15:1364341. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1364341. eCollection 2024.
2
Unplanned admissions after day-case surgery in an Italian third-level pediatric hospital: a retrospective study.意大利一家三级儿科医院日间手术术后的非计划入院情况:一项回顾性研究。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Sep 26;12(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00342-y.
3
Cost Sharing and Cost Shifting Mechanisms under a per Diem Payment System in a County of China.
中国某县按日付费制度下的成本分担和成本转移机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 31;20(3):2522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032522.
4
Rural and urban differences in quality of dementia care of persons with dementia and caregivers across all domains: a systematic review.农村和城市在痴呆症患者和护理人员所有领域的痴呆症护理质量方面的差异:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 31;23(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09100-8.
5
The Projection of Iran's Healthcare Expenditures By 2030: Evidence of a Time-Series Analysis.伊朗医疗保健支出预测至 2030 年:时间序列分析的证据。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2563-2573. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.5405. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
Is value-based payment for healthcare feasible under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme?基于价值的医疗保健支付在加纳国家健康保险计划下是否可行?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00794-y.
7
Health Care Policy and Congenital Heart Disease: 2020 Focus on Our 2030 Future.医疗保健政策与先天性心脏病:2020 聚焦我们的 2030 未来。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):e020605. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020605. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
8
Macro-level efficiency of health expenditure: Estimates for 15 major economies.卫生支出的宏观效率:15 大经济体的估算。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;287:114270. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114270. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
9
The Healthcare Cost Burden in Adults with High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.心血管疾病高危成年人的医疗费用负担
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Sep;5(3):425-435. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00257-8. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
10
Budgetary targets as cost-containment measure in the Swiss healthcare system? Lessons from abroad.瑞士医疗体系中作为成本控制措施的预算目标?来自国外的经验教训。
Health Policy. 2020 Jun;124(6):605-614. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 May 16.