Division of Health Systems and Public Health, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Social Research Methodology Group, Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 11;23(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09135-x.
People in low- and middle-income countries are disproportionately affected by Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). NCD's such as heart disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, and diabetes, are the leading cause of premature death worldwide and represent an emerging global health threat. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore decision makers perceptions of developing population-level interventions (policies and programmes), targeting risk factors for hypertension and diabetes, in South Africa.
Using purposive sampling we recruited fifteen participants, who were well informed about the policies, programs or supportive environment for prevention and management of diabetes and hypertension in South Africa. We conducted 12 individual interviews and 1 group interview (consisting of 3 participants). Data was analysed thematically in NVivo. The results were shared and discussed in two consultative stakeholder workshops, with participants, as part of a member validation process in qualitative research. All communication with participants was done virtually using MS Teams or ZOOM.
For development of population-level interventions, key enablers included, stakeholders' engagement and collaboration, contextualization of policies and programs, and evaluation and organic growth. Challenges for supportive policy and program formulation, and to enable supportive environments, included the lack of time and resources, lack of consultation with stakeholders, regulations and competing priorities, and ineffective monitoring and evaluation. The main drivers of population-level interventions for diabetes and hypertension were perceived as the current contextual realities, costs, organizational reasons, and communication between various stakeholders.
To address the risk factors for hypertension and diabetes in South Africa, policies and programs must account for the needs of the public and the historical and socio-economic climate. Feasibility and sustainability of programs can only be ensured when the resources are provided, and environments enabled to promote behavior change on a population-level. A holistic public health approach, which is contextually relevant, and evidence informed, is considered best practice in the formulation of population-level interventions.
中低收入国家的人民受非传染性疾病(NCD)的影响不成比例。心脏病、癌症、慢性呼吸道疾病和糖尿病等 NCD 是全球范围内导致过早死亡的主要原因,也是新兴的全球健康威胁。本定性研究的目的是探讨决策者对制定针对高血压和糖尿病风险因素的人群干预措施(政策和方案)的看法,该研究在南非进行。
我们采用目的抽样法招募了 15 名参与者,他们对南非预防和管理糖尿病和高血压的政策、方案或支持环境有深入了解。我们进行了 12 次个人访谈和 1 次小组访谈(由 3 名参与者组成)。使用 NVivo 进行主题分析。结果在两次协商利益相关者研讨会上进行了分享和讨论,参与者是定性研究中成员验证过程的一部分。与参与者的所有交流都是通过 MS Teams 或 ZOOM 进行的。
对于发展人群干预措施,主要的促成因素包括利益相关者的参与和合作、政策和方案的本地化以及评估和有机增长。支持政策和方案制定以及支持性环境的挑战包括缺乏时间和资源、缺乏与利益相关者的协商、法规和竞争优先事项以及监测和评估效果不佳。促进高血压和糖尿病人群干预措施的主要驱动力是当前的背景现实、成本、组织原因以及各个利益相关者之间的沟通。
为了应对南非高血压和糖尿病的风险因素,政策和方案必须考虑公众的需求以及历史和社会经济背景。只有在提供资源并为促进人口层面的行为改变创造环境的情况下,才能确保计划的可行性和可持续性。从公共卫生的角度出发,考虑到背景和循证,被认为是制定人群干预措施的最佳实践。