• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卢旺达针对高血压和糖尿病风险因素的人群干预措施:现状分析。

Population-Level Interventions Targeting Risk Factors for Hypertension and Diabetes in Rwanda: A Situational Analysis.

机构信息

College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.

Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;10:882033. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.882033. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.882033
PMID:35844869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9283981/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eighty percent (80%) of global Non-Communicable Diseases attributed deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) with hypertension and diabetes being key contributors. The overall prevalence of hypertension was 15.3% the national prevalence of diabetes in rural and urban was 7.5 and 9.7%, respectively among 15-64 years. Hypertension represents a leading cause of death (43%) among hospitalized patients at the University teaching hospital of Kigali. This study aimed to identify ongoing population-level interventions targeting risk factors for diabetes and hypertension and to explore perceived barriers and facilitators for their implementation in Rwanda.

METHODS

This situational analysis comprised a desk review, key informant interviews, and stakeholders' consultation. Ongoing population-level interventions were identified through searches of government websites, complemented by one-on-one consultations with 60 individuals nominated by their respective organizations involved with prevention efforts. Semi-structured interviews with purposively selected key informants sought to identify perceived barriers and facilitators for the implementation of population-level interventions. A consultative workshop with stakeholders was organized to validate and consolidate the findings.

RESULTS

We identified a range of policies in the areas of food and nutrition, physical activity promotion, and tobacco control. Supporting program and environment interventions were mainly awareness campaigns to improve knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward healthy eating, physical activity, and alcohol and tobacco use reduction, healthy food production, physical activity infrastructure, smoke-free areas, limits on tobacco production and bans on non-standardized alcohol production. Perceived barriers included limited stakeholder involvement, misbeliefs about ongoing interventions, insufficient funding, inconsistency in intervention implementation, weak policy enforcement, and conflicts between commercial and public health interests. Perceived facilitators were strengthened multi-sectoral collaboration and involvement in ongoing interventions, enhanced community awareness of ongoing interventions, special attention paid to the elderly, and increased funds for population-level interventions and policy enforcement.

CONCLUSION

There are many ongoing population-level interventions in Rwanda targeting risk factors for diabetes and hypertension. Identified gaps, perceived barriers, and facilitators provide a useful starting point for strengthening efforts to address the significant burden of disease attributable to diabetes and hypertension.

摘要

背景

全球 80%的非传染性疾病死亡归因于中低收入国家(LMIC),其中高血压和糖尿病是主要致病因素。15-64 岁人群中,高血压的总体患病率为 15.3%,农村和城市地区的糖尿病患病率分别为 7.5%和 9.7%。在基加利教学医院住院的患者中,高血压是导致死亡的主要原因(43%)。本研究旨在确定针对糖尿病和高血压危险因素的正在进行的人群干预措施,并探讨其在卢旺达实施的障碍和促进因素。

方法

本情况分析包括桌面审查、关键知情人访谈和利益相关者协商。通过政府网站搜索,以及与各自组织中参与预防工作的 60 人进行一对一咨询,确定正在进行的人群干预措施。对有针对性选择的关键知情人进行半结构化访谈,以确定实施人群干预措施的障碍和促进因素。与利益相关者组织了一次磋商研讨会,以验证和整合研究结果。

结果

我们确定了一系列食品和营养、促进身体活动和控制烟草的政策。支持方案和环境干预措施主要是提高知识、态度和健康饮食、身体活动以及减少酒精和烟草使用、健康食品生产、身体活动基础设施、无烟区、限制烟草生产和禁止非标准化酒精生产等方面的实践意识运动。障碍包括利益相关者参与有限、对正在进行的干预措施的误解、资金不足、干预措施实施不一致、政策执行不力以及商业和公共卫生利益之间的冲突。促进因素包括加强多部门合作和参与正在进行的干预措施、提高社区对正在进行的干预措施的认识、特别关注老年人、增加人群干预措施和政策执行的资金。

结论

卢旺达有许多针对糖尿病和高血压危险因素的正在进行的人群干预措施。确定的差距、障碍和促进因素为加强努力应对归因于糖尿病和高血压的重大疾病负担提供了一个有用的起点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d513/9283981/458736cfd48d/fpubh-10-882033-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d513/9283981/458736cfd48d/fpubh-10-882033-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d513/9283981/458736cfd48d/fpubh-10-882033-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Population-Level Interventions Targeting Risk Factors for Hypertension and Diabetes in Rwanda: A Situational Analysis.卢旺达针对高血压和糖尿病风险因素的人群干预措施:现状分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;10:882033. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.882033. eCollection 2022.
2
Taking stock of population-level interventions targeting risk factors for hypertension and diabetes in Rwanda and South Africa: methodological reflections and lessons learnt from conducting a multi-component situational analysis.评估卢旺达和南非针对高血压和糖尿病风险因素的人群干预措施:从开展多组分形势分析中得到的方法学反思和经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 25;23(1):1630. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16537-3.
3
Decision makers perceptions and experiences of developing population-level interventions targeting risk factors for hypertension and diabetes in South Africa: a qualitative study.决策者对南非制定针对高血压和糖尿病风险因素的人群干预措施的看法和经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 11;23(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09135-x.
4
Population-level interventions targeting risk factors of diabetes and hypertension in South Africa: a document review.针对南非糖尿病和高血压风险因素的人群干预措施:文献回顾。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;21(1):2283. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11910-6.
5
Tuberculosis结核病
6
Bridging barriers to advance multisector approaches to improve food security, nutrition and population health in Nepal: transdisciplinary perspectives.跨越障碍,推进多部门方法,改善尼泊尔的粮食安全、营养和人口健康:跨学科视角。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 18;19(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7204-4.
7
Challenges and enablers for implementation of WHO 'Best buys' interventions targeting risk factors of diabetes and hypertension in South Africa: a mixed methods study.在南非实施世界卫生组织针对糖尿病和高血压风险因素的“最佳购买”干预措施的挑战和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Dec 30;43:215. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.215.31547. eCollection 2022.
8
A population-based national estimate of the prevalence and risk factors associated with hypertension in Rwanda: implications for prevention and control.卢旺达基于人群的全国高血压患病率及相关危险因素估计:对预防和控制的启示
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 10;18(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4536-9.
9
Alcohol policies in Malawi: inclusion of WHO "best buy" interventions and use of multi-sectoral action.马拉维的酒精政策:纳入世卫组织“最佳购买”干预措施和采用多部门行动。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 15;18(Suppl 1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5833-7.
10
The effectiveness of web-based programs on the reduction of childhood obesity in school-aged children: A systematic review.基于网络的项目对学龄儿童肥胖症减轻的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-14. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-248.

引用本文的文献

1
Health and well-being of older adults in rural and urban Rwanda: epidemiological findings from a population based cross-sectional study.卢旺达城乡老年人的健康与福祉:一项基于人群的横断面研究的流行病学结果
J Glob Health. 2025 May 5;15:04108. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04108.
2
Taking stock of population-level interventions targeting risk factors for hypertension and diabetes in Rwanda and South Africa: methodological reflections and lessons learnt from conducting a multi-component situational analysis.评估卢旺达和南非针对高血压和糖尿病风险因素的人群干预措施:从开展多组分形势分析中得到的方法学反思和经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 25;23(1):1630. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16537-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and characteristics associated with diabetes mellitus and impaired fasting glucose among people aged 15 to 64 years in rural and urban Rwanda: secondary data analysis of World Health Organization surveillance data.卢旺达城乡 15 至 64 岁人群中糖尿病和空腹血糖受损的流行情况及相关特征:对世界卫生组织监测数据的二次数据分析。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Feb 9;41:115. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.115.30682. eCollection 2022.
2
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a national multisectoral action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in Nepal: perspectives of stakeholders.尼泊尔实施预防和控制非传染性疾病国家多部门行动计划的障碍和促进因素:利益相关者的观点。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1963069. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1963069.
3
Noncommunicable Diseases Prevention In Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Overview of Health in All Policies (HiAP).非传染性疾病预防在中低收入国家:健康全纳入政策(HiAP)概览。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:46958020927885. doi: 10.1177/0046958020927885.
4
Assessing health system challenges and opportunities for better noncommunicable disease outcomes: the case of Mauritius.评估卫生系统在改善非传染性疾病方面面临的挑战和机遇:以毛里求斯为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5039-4.
5
Improving the implementation of tobacco control policies in low-and middle-income countries: a proposed framework.改善低收入和中等收入国家烟草控制政策的实施:一个拟议框架
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Dec 16;4(6):e002078. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002078. eCollection 2019.
6
Smoking cessation efforts should target LMICs.戒烟工作应针对低收入和中等收入国家。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Sep;7(9):721. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30257-7. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
7
Analysis of alcohol policy in Nigeria: multi-sectoral action and the integration of the WHO "best-buy" interventions.尼日利亚的酒精政策分析:多部门行动和世卫组织“最佳购买”干预措施的整合。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7139-9.
8
The Human Resources for Health Program in Rwanda - Reflections on Achievements and Challenges Comment on "Health Professional Training and Capacity Strengthening Through International Academic Partnerships: The First Five Years of the Human Resources for Health Program in Rwanda".卢旺达的卫生人力资源计划——对成就和挑战的反思 评“通过国际学术伙伴关系进行卫生专业人员培训和能力建设:卢旺达卫生人力资源计划的头五年”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Nov 21;8(2):128-131. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.114.
9
Comparative financing analysis and political economy of noncommunicable diseases.非传染性疾病的比较融资分析与政治经济学。
J Med Econ. 2019 Aug;22(8):722-727. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1600523. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
10
Alcohol policies in Malawi: inclusion of WHO "best buy" interventions and use of multi-sectoral action.马拉维的酒精政策:纳入世卫组织“最佳购买”干预措施和采用多部门行动。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 15;18(Suppl 1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5833-7.