University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Little Otter Health, San Francisco, California.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;62(8):885-894.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
The dimensional model of adversity and psychopathology hypothesizes deprivation and threat impact distinct neurobiological pathways, such as brain structure. This hypothesis has not been examined longitudinally or in young children. This study tested longitudinal associations between threat and deprivation measured in preschool and brain structure in childhood. It was hypothesized that threat would be associated with amygdala and hippocampal subcortical volume and deprivation would be associated with cortical thickness in association cortex.
The study included T1-weighted scans from 72 children (5-10 years old, 54.2% female participants). Threat was measured by the presence of domestic violence, sexual abuse, physical abuse, or neighborhood violence. Deprivation was measured by the presence of neglect. Associations of deprivation or threat with brain structure were examined controlling for other dimension (deprivation or threat) and nuisance covariates using whole-brain vertex-wise analyses. Subcortical volume was extracted, and the same associations were examined using multiple regression.
Threat was associated with widespread decreases in cortical surface area across the prefrontal cortex and other regions. Threat was not associated with amygdala or hippocampal volume. Deprivation was associated with increased thickness in occipital cortex, insula, and cingulate.
Results suggest distinct associations of deprivation and threat on brain structure in early childhood. Threat is associated with widespread differences in surface area, and deprivation is associated with differences in cortical thickness. These observations are consistent with work in adolescence and adulthood and reflect how dimensions of adversity differentially impact neural structure.
逆境与精神病理学的维度模型假设剥夺和威胁会影响不同的神经生物学途径,如大脑结构。这一假说尚未在纵向或幼儿中得到检验。本研究检验了学前阶段测量的威胁和剥夺与儿童期大脑结构之间的纵向关联。研究假设威胁与杏仁核和海马亚皮质体积有关,而剥夺与联合皮质的皮质厚度有关。
该研究纳入了 72 名儿童(5-10 岁,54.2%为女性参与者)的 T1 加权扫描。威胁通过家庭暴力、性虐待、身体虐待或邻里暴力的存在来衡量。剥夺通过忽视的存在来衡量。在控制其他维度(剥夺或威胁)和混杂协变量后,采用全脑顶点分析,对剥夺或威胁与大脑结构的关联进行了检验。提取了皮质下体积,并使用多元回归对同样的关联进行了检验。
威胁与前额叶皮层和其他区域的皮质表面积广泛减少有关。威胁与杏仁核或海马体体积无关。剥夺与枕叶皮层、岛叶和扣带回的厚度增加有关。
结果表明,剥夺和威胁对幼儿大脑结构有不同的影响。威胁与表面积的广泛差异有关,而剥夺与皮质厚度的差异有关。这些观察结果与青少年和成年期的研究一致,反映了逆境的不同维度如何对神经结构产生不同的影响。