Centre for Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University), New Delhi, 110025, India.
Centre for Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, 110025, India.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Jan;33:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
Individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) are usually prescribed manual therapy and exercise programs. Respiratory exercise interventions are also recommended by some researchers for CLBP. However, the evidence for the relative effectiveness of these treatments is limited, and the question of which sort of intervention is most suited remains unanswered.
This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of respiratory interventions in CLBP.
A systematic search was performed using databases: PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, Cochrane Library, and Science Direct. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021233739).
Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Out of these, one was of poor, three were of fair, and three were of good qualities. A total of 293 subjects were included in seven studies, the mean age of subjects ranged from 21 to 53 years. The largest effect size was reported for pain (d = 1.5) and maximum inspiratory pressure (d = 1.38). No detrimental effects were reported for any of the intervention programs.
Since most of the research has been done on pain and MIP, and both of these parameters have revealed significant changes with large effect size, therefore it can be concluded that respiratory interventions improve pain and MIP in CLBP. Owing to the limited number of studies available, a definitive outcome could not be documented for other parameters. Thus, further research is needed to provide a more robust piece of evidence and understanding.
慢性下背痛(CLBP)患者通常被开具手法治疗和运动方案。一些研究人员也推荐呼吸运动干预措施用于 CLBP。然而,这些治疗方法的相对有效性的证据有限,哪种干预最适合的问题仍未得到解答。
本系统评价旨在评估呼吸干预措施在 CLBP 中的疗效。
使用数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、PEDro、Cochrane Library 和 Science Direct)进行系统检索。该综述在 PROSPERO(CRD42021233739)中进行了注册。
符合纳入标准的研究有 7 项。其中,1 项质量较差,3 项质量中等,3 项质量较好。7 项研究共纳入 293 名受试者,受试者的平均年龄范围为 21 至 53 岁。最大的效应量报告为疼痛(d = 1.5)和最大吸气压力(d = 1.38)。任何干预方案均未报告有不良影响。
由于大多数研究都集中在疼痛和 MIP 上,而且这两个参数都显示出具有较大效应量的显著变化,因此可以得出结论,呼吸干预措施可改善 CLBP 患者的疼痛和 MIP。由于可用的研究数量有限,因此无法为其他参数记录明确的结果。因此,需要进一步研究以提供更有力的证据和理解。