• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[城市污泥不同处理处置工艺路线的碳排放比较]

[Comparison of Carbon Emissions in Different Treatment and Disposal Process Routes of Municipal Sludge].

作者信息

Li Zhe-Kun, Zhang Li-Qiu, Du Zi-Wen, Feng Li, Liu Yong-Ze

机构信息

College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Feb 8;44(2):1181-1190. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202204146.

DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202204146
PMID:36775640
Abstract

With the introduction of the goal of carbon neutrality, the efficient resource recycling of municipal sludge has been given increasing attention. In order to scientifically evaluate the routes of sludge treatment and disposal from the perspective of carbon emissions, four typical routes were chosen for accounting the carbon emissions per ton for dry sludge (DS). Based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), combined with Chinese sludge characteristics, carbon emissions were divided into three types:the direct emissions, indirect emissions, and carbon offsets, and accounting boundaries were initiated at sludge thickening and ended at products or energies. The results showed that the total carbon emission of R4 (gravity thickening+thermal hydrolysis+anaerobic digestion+plate and frame filter pressing+transportation+land utilization) was 99.41 kg·t(calculated as CO/DS, same below), which was the route with lowest carbon emissions. If the fugitive emission of CH from anaerobic digestion was avoided, the route (R4) could achieve carbon neutrality at this stage. Process units with larger carbon emissions should focus on optimization to reduce the carbon emissions, such as through thermal drying (1049.24 kg·t), deep dewatering (960.99 kg·t), sanitary landfill (786.24 kg·t), incineration (635.52 kg·t), aerobic composting (614.17 kg·t), and thermal hydrolysis (544.67 kg·t). The main carbon offsets were the incineration power generation (-1440.29 kg·t), CH collection of anaerobic digestion (-435.06 kg·t), land utilization (-415.83 kg·t), and building materials utilization (-169.75 kg·t). In summary, "anaerobic digestion and land utilization" has a great potential for carbon offsets, which should be advocated for as the widely used treatment.

摘要

随着碳中和目标的提出,城市污泥的高效资源回收利用受到越来越多的关注。为了从碳排放的角度科学评估污泥处理处置路线,选择了四条典型路线来计算每吨干污泥(DS)的碳排放量。基于政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)的方法,结合中国污泥特性,碳排放分为三类:直接排放、间接排放和碳抵消,核算边界从污泥浓缩开始,到产品或能源结束。结果表明,R4路线(重力浓缩+热水解+厌氧消化+板框压滤+运输+土地利用)的总碳排放量为99.41kg·t(以CO₂/DS计,下同),是碳排放量最低的路线。如果避免厌氧消化过程中CH₄的逸散排放,该路线(R4)在现阶段可实现碳中和。碳排放较大的工艺单元应重点优化以减少碳排放,如热干燥(1049.24kg·t)、深度脱水(960.99kg·t)、卫生填埋(786.24kg·t)、焚烧(635.52kg·t)、好氧堆肥(614.17kg·t)和热水解(544.67kg·t)。主要的碳抵消包括焚烧发电(-1440.29kg·t)、厌氧消化CH₄收集(-435.06kg·t)、土地利用(-415.83kg·t)和建筑材料利用(-169.75kg·t)。综上所述,“厌氧消化+土地利用”具有很大的碳抵消潜力,应作为广泛应用的处理方式加以倡导。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of Carbon Emissions in Different Treatment and Disposal Process Routes of Municipal Sludge].[城市污泥不同处理处置工艺路线的碳排放比较]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Feb 8;44(2):1181-1190. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202204146.
2
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.
3
Environmental impacts and optimizing strategies of municipal sludge treatment and disposal routes in China based on life cycle analysis.基于生命周期分析的中国城市污泥处理处置路线的环境影响及优化策略
Environ Int. 2022 Aug;166:107378. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107378. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
4
Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of typical sewage sludge incineration treatment route based on two case studies in China.基于中国的两个案例研究的典型污水污泥焚烧处理路线的温室气体排放生命周期评估。
Environ Res. 2023 Aug 15;231(Pt 1):115959. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115959. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
5
Development, current state and future trends of sludge management in China: Based on exploratory data and CO-equivaient emissions analysis.中国污泥管理的发展、现状和未来趋势:基于探索性数据分析和 CO 当量排放分析。
Environ Int. 2020 Nov;144:106093. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106093. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
6
Systematical analysis of sludge treatment and disposal technologies for carbon footprint reduction.系统分析污泥处理处置技术以减少碳足迹。
J Environ Sci (China). 2023 Jun;128:224-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2022.07.038. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
7
Analysis on carbon dioxide emission reduction during the anaerobic synergetic digestion technology of sludge and kitchen waste: Taking kitchen waste synergetic digestion project in Zhenjiang as an example.污泥和餐厨垃圾厌氧协同消化技术的二氧化碳减排分析——以镇江餐厨垃圾协同消化项目为例。
Waste Manag. 2017 Nov;69:360-364. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.033. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
8
Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China: influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures.中国城市固体废物卫生填埋过程中的温室气体排放:废物特性和 LFG 处理措施的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:510-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.039. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
9
Assessment of carbon footprint emissions and environmental concerns of solid waste treatment and disposal techniques; case study of Malaysia.评估固体废弃物处理和处置技术的碳足迹排放和环境问题;以马来西亚为例。
Waste Manag. 2017 Dec;70:282-292. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.044. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
10
Environmental impact and optimization suggestions of pig manure and wastewater treatment systems from a life cycle perspective.从生命周期角度评估猪粪和废水处理系统的环境影响及优化建议。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 20;905:167262. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167262. Epub 2023 Sep 21.