Peltola Maria E, Leitinger Markus, Halford Jonathan J, Vinayan Kollencheri Puthenveettil, Kobayashi Katsuhiro, Pressler Ronit M, Mindruta Ioana, Mayor Luis Carlos, Lauronen Leena, Beniczky Sándor
HUS Diagnostic Center, Clinical Neurophysiology, Clinical Neurosciences, Epilepsia Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2023 Mar;147:108-120. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
This article provides recommendations on the minimum standards for recording routine ("standard") and sleep electroencephalography (EEG). The joint working group of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) and the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) developed the standards according to the methodology suggested for epilepsy-related clinical practice guidelines by the Epilepsy Guidelines Working Group. We reviewed the published evidence using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The quality of evidence for sleep induction methods was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method. A tool for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias in technical and methodological studies. Where high-quality published evidence was lacking, we used modified Delphi technique to reach expert consensus. The GRADE system was used to formulate the recommendations. The quality of evidence was low or moderate. We formulated 16 consensus-based recommendations for minimum standards for recording routine and sleep EEG. The recommendations comprise the following aspects: indications, technical standards, recording duration, sleep induction, and provocative methods.
本文提供了关于常规(“标准”)脑电图和睡眠脑电图记录最低标准的建议。国际临床神经生理联合会(IFCN)和国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)的联合工作组根据癫痫指南工作组针对癫痫相关临床实践指南所建议的方法制定了这些标准。我们使用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明对已发表的证据进行了综述。采用推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法评估睡眠诱导方法的证据质量。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS-2)评估技术和方法学研究中的偏倚风险。在缺乏高质量已发表证据的情况下,我们采用改良德尔菲技术达成专家共识。使用GRADE系统制定建议。证据质量为低或中等。我们针对常规和睡眠脑电图记录的最低标准制定了16条基于共识的建议。这些建议包括以下几个方面:适应证、技术标准、记录时长、睡眠诱导和激发方法。