Mendelsohn A D, Forster R K, Mendelsohn S L, Dennis J J, Heidemann D G, Levine I K, Parel J M, Di Maio J M
Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, FL 33101.
Cornea. 1987;6(3):219-25.
A comparison was made of the accuracy of the Tono-Pen, Pneumatonometer, and Perkins hand-held tonometers by measuring the hydrostatically controlled intracular pressure from 10 to 50 mm Hg in human eye bank eyes. The open stopcock method was used in which the cannulated eye, the hydrostatic pressure controlling column, and a manometer were continuously open to each other. The Pneumatonometer gave accurate results at 50 mm Hg but overestimated the lower intraocular pressures; whereas, the Perkins gave satifactory results at 10 and 20 mm Hg but underestimated higher intraocular pressures. The Tono-Pen displayed the least deviation from the controlled pressure over the entire range studied. Another aspect of this study involved determining that a therapeutic soft contact lens did not have any noticeably adverse effect on the accuracy of the Pneumatonometer and Tono-Pen tonometers.
通过在人眼库眼球中测量10至50毫米汞柱的静水控制眼压,对Tono-Pen眼压计、气动眼压计和珀金斯手持式眼压计的准确性进行了比较。采用开放旋塞法,即插管眼球、静水压力控制柱和压力计相互连续开放。气动眼压计在50毫米汞柱时给出了准确结果,但高估了较低的眼压;而珀金斯眼压计在10和20毫米汞柱时给出了满意结果,但低估了较高的眼压。在整个研究范围内,Tono-Pen眼压计与控制压力的偏差最小。这项研究的另一个方面涉及确定治疗性软性隐形眼镜对气动眼压计和Tono-Pen眼压计的准确性没有任何明显的不利影响。