Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
University Program in Genetics and Genomics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
mBio. 2023 Apr 25;14(2):e0344922. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03449-22. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
Histone proteins are found across diverse lineages of , many of which package DNA and form chromatin. However, previous research has led to the hypothesis that the histone-like proteins of high-salt-adapted archaea, or halophiles, function differently. The sole histone protein encoded by the model halophilic species Halobacterium salinarum, HpyA, is nonessential and expressed at levels too low to enable genome-wide DNA packaging. Instead, HpyA mediates the transcriptional response to salt stress. Here we compare the features of genome-wide binding of HpyA to those of HstA, the sole histone of another model halophile, Haloferax volcanii. , like , is a nonessential gene. To better understand HpyA and HstA functions, protein-DNA binding data (chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing [ChIP-seq]) of these halophilic histones are compared to publicly available ChIP-seq data from DNA binding proteins across all domains of life, including transcription factors (TFs), nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs), and histones. These analyses demonstrate that HpyA and HstA bind the genome infrequently in discrete regions, which is similar to TFs but unlike NAPs, which bind a much larger genomic fraction. However, unlike TFs that typically bind in intergenic regions, HpyA and HstA binding sites are located in both coding and intergenic regions. The genome-wide dinucleotide periodicity known to facilitate histone binding was undetectable in the genomes of both species. Instead, TF-like and histone-like binding sequence preferences were detected for HstA and HpyA, respectively. Taken together, these data suggest that halophilic archaeal histones are unlikely to facilitate genome-wide chromatin formation and that their function defies categorization as a TF, NAP, or histone. Most cells in eukaryotic species-from yeast to humans-possess histone proteins that pack and unpack DNA in response to environmental cues. These essential proteins regulate genes necessary for important cellular processes, including development and stress protection. Although the histone fold domain originated in the domain of life , the function of archaeal histone-like proteins is not well understood relative to those of eukaryotes. We recently discovered that, unlike histones of eukaryotes, histones in hypersaline-adapted archaeal species do not package DNA and can act as transcription factors (TFs) to regulate stress response gene expression. However, the function of histones across species of hypersaline-adapted archaea still remains unclear. Here, we compare hypersaline histone function to a variety of DNA binding proteins across the tree of life, revealing histone-like behavior in some respects and specific transcriptional regulatory function in others.
组蛋白蛋白存在于不同谱系的 中,其中许多组蛋白将 DNA 包装并形成染色质。然而,先前的研究导致了这样的假设,即高盐适应古菌(或嗜盐菌)的组蛋白样蛋白的功能不同。模式嗜盐物种盐生盐杆菌中唯一编码的组蛋白蛋白 HpyA 是非必需的,并且表达水平太低,无法实现全基因组 DNA 包装。相反,HpyA 介导对盐胁迫的转录反应。在这里,我们比较了 HpyA 与另一种模式嗜盐菌 Haloferax volcanii 中唯一的组蛋白 HstA 的全基因组结合特征。与 一样,HpyA 也是一个非必需基因。为了更好地理解 HpyA 和 HstA 的功能,将这些嗜盐组蛋白的蛋白质-DNA 结合数据(染色质免疫沉淀测序 [ChIP-seq])与来自所有生命领域的 DNA 结合蛋白的公开可用 ChIP-seq 数据进行了比较,包括转录因子 (TFs)、核小体相关蛋白 (NAPs) 和组蛋白。这些分析表明,HpyA 和 HstA 很少在离散区域中频繁地结合基因组,这与 TFs 相似,但与 NAPs 不同,NAPs 结合更大的基因组部分。然而,与通常结合基因间区域的 TFs 不同,HpyA 和 HstA 的结合位点位于编码和基因间区域。在这两个物种的基因组中都没有检测到已知有助于组蛋白结合的双核苷酸周期性。相反,分别检测到 HstA 和 HpyA 的 TF 样和组蛋白样结合序列偏好。总之,这些数据表明,嗜盐古菌的组蛋白不太可能促进全基因组染色质的形成,并且它们的功能不符合作为 TF、NAP 或组蛋白的分类。来自酵母到人等真核生物的大多数细胞都拥有组蛋白,这些组蛋白可响应环境线索包装和解开 DNA。这些必需蛋白调节对重要细胞过程(包括发育和应激保护)至关重要的基因。尽管组蛋白折叠结构域起源于生命的领域,但相对于真核生物,古菌的组蛋白样蛋白的功能尚不清楚。我们最近发现,与真核生物的组蛋白不同,高盐适应古菌物种中的组蛋白不包装 DNA,并且可以作为转录因子 (TFs) 来调节应激反应基因的表达。然而,高盐适应古菌物种的组蛋白功能仍不清楚。在这里,我们将高盐组蛋白功能与生命之树中的各种 DNA 结合蛋白进行了比较,揭示了在某些方面具有组蛋白样行为,而在其他方面则具有特定的转录调节功能。