J.H. Barsuk is Robert Hirschtick Professor of Medicine and professor of medicine and medical education, Department of Medicine and Medical Education, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
D. Mitra is assistant professor of medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Acad Med. 2023 Jul 1;98(7):821-827. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005170. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) is a rigorous form of competency-based learning. Components of SBML include a pretest, deliberate practice, and a posttest; all learners must meet or exceed a minimum passing standard (MPS) on the posttest before completing training. The authors aimed to explore whether a modified SBML curriculum (without a pretest assessment) was as effective as the standard SBML curriculum (with a pretest assessment).
The authors performed a randomized controlled trial of internal medicine residents who participated in an internal jugular central venous catheter insertion SBML curriculum at a tertiary care academic medical center in Chicago, Illinois, from December 2018 through December 2021. Residents were randomly assigned to complete the usual SBML intervention (pretest group) or to complete a modified SBML intervention without a pretest (no pretest group). The authors compared initial posttest performance and training time between groups.
Eighty-nine of 120 eligible residents (74.1%) completed the study: 43 in the pretest group and 46 in the no pretest group. Median (IQR) initial posttest scores were not statistically different between the pretest group (96.6 [93.1-100]) and the no pretest group (96.6 [92.4-100]). However, all 43 residents (100%) in the pretest group reached the MPS at the initial posttest compared with 41 of the 46 (89%) in the no pretest group ( P = .06). Residents in the pretest group required 16.5 hours more faculty and learning time than the no pretest group.
More residents who completed a pretest reached the MPS at initial posttest. However, incorporating a pretest during the internal jugular central venous catheter SBML curriculum required substantially more learner and faculty time without clear performance benefits.
基于模拟的精通学习(SBML)是一种严格的基于能力的学习形式。SBML 的组成部分包括预测试、刻意练习和后测试;所有学习者在后测试中必须达到或超过最低通过标准(MPS),然后才能完成培训。作者旨在探讨没有预测试评估的修改版 SBML 课程是否与标准 SBML 课程(有预测试评估)一样有效。
作者在伊利诺伊州芝加哥的一家三级保健学术医疗中心对参加颈内静脉中央静脉导管插入 SBML 课程的内科住院医师进行了一项随机对照试验。住院医师被随机分配完成标准 SBML 干预(预测试组)或不进行预测试的修改版 SBML 干预(无预测试组)。作者比较了两组的初始后测试表现和培训时间。
在 120 名符合条件的住院医师中,有 89 名(74.1%)完成了研究:预测试组 43 名,无预测试组 46 名。预测试组(96.6 [93.1-100])和无预测试组(96.6 [92.4-100])的中位数(IQR)初始后测试分数没有统计学差异。然而,在初始后测试中,预测试组的 43 名(100%)住院医师均达到 MPS,而无预测试组的 46 名(89%)中仅有 41 名(P=0.06)。预测试组的住院医师需要比无预测试组多 16.5 小时的教师和学习时间。
更多完成预测试的住院医师在初始后测试中达到 MPS。然而,在颈内静脉中央静脉导管 SBML 课程中加入预测试需要大量的学习者和教师时间,而没有明显的绩效优势。