Chaudhry Hajara S, Kavlick Mark F
Visiting Scientist Program, Laboratory Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA; Research & Support Unit, Laboratory Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA.
Research & Support Unit, Laboratory Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2023 May;64:102845. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102845. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
Wet-vacuum collection of forensic biological material has been shown to recover greater total DNA yields compared to traditional methods, such as wet swabbing. The Pulse Lavage System (PLS), an orthopedic surgical instrument, was evaluated in comparison to a forensic wet-vacuum device for the DNA collection and recovery of diluted bloodstains from seven substrates of varying porosity. Three different PLS models were evaluated, and each model yielded DNA concentrations which were comparable to the forensic wet-vacuum system, recovering 79-99 % relative to the wet-vacuum, which were overall not statistically different. Our results suggest that the PLS, though intended for medical use, has the potential to serve as an affordable alternative to the forensic wet-vacuum system. However, additional evaluation and modification to the PLS collection method may be warranted for complete optimization.
与传统方法(如湿拭子法)相比,法医生物材料的湿真空采集已被证明能获得更高的总DNA产量。对一种骨科手术器械脉冲冲洗系统(PLS)与一种法医湿真空设备进行了比较评估,以收集和回收来自七种孔隙率不同的基质上的稀释血迹。评估了三种不同的PLS型号,每种型号产生的DNA浓度与法医湿真空系统相当,相对于湿真空系统回收了79%-99%,总体上无统计学差异。我们的结果表明,PLS虽然是用于医疗用途,但有可能成为法医湿真空系统的一种经济实惠的替代方案。然而,可能需要对PLS采集方法进行额外的评估和改进,以实现完全优化。