Suppr超能文献

脉冲冲洗系统(PLS)与生物材料的法医湿真空采集法对比

Pulse Lavage System (PLS) versus forensic wet-vacuum collection of biological material.

作者信息

Chaudhry Hajara S, Kavlick Mark F

机构信息

Visiting Scientist Program, Laboratory Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA; Research & Support Unit, Laboratory Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA.

Research & Support Unit, Laboratory Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2023 May;64:102845. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102845. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

Abstract

Wet-vacuum collection of forensic biological material has been shown to recover greater total DNA yields compared to traditional methods, such as wet swabbing. The Pulse Lavage System (PLS), an orthopedic surgical instrument, was evaluated in comparison to a forensic wet-vacuum device for the DNA collection and recovery of diluted bloodstains from seven substrates of varying porosity. Three different PLS models were evaluated, and each model yielded DNA concentrations which were comparable to the forensic wet-vacuum system, recovering 79-99 % relative to the wet-vacuum, which were overall not statistically different. Our results suggest that the PLS, though intended for medical use, has the potential to serve as an affordable alternative to the forensic wet-vacuum system. However, additional evaluation and modification to the PLS collection method may be warranted for complete optimization.

摘要

与传统方法(如湿拭子法)相比,法医生物材料的湿真空采集已被证明能获得更高的总DNA产量。对一种骨科手术器械脉冲冲洗系统(PLS)与一种法医湿真空设备进行了比较评估,以收集和回收来自七种孔隙率不同的基质上的稀释血迹。评估了三种不同的PLS型号,每种型号产生的DNA浓度与法医湿真空系统相当,相对于湿真空系统回收了79%-99%,总体上无统计学差异。我们的结果表明,PLS虽然是用于医疗用途,但有可能成为法医湿真空系统的一种经济实惠的替代方案。然而,可能需要对PLS采集方法进行额外的评估和改进,以实现完全优化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验