Muller Magriet, de Villiers André
Department of Chemistry and Polymer Science, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.
Department of Chemistry and Polymer Science, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.
J Chromatogr A. 2023 Mar 15;1692:463843. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.463843. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
The combination of hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) and reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC) has proved effective in the LC × LC analysis of polyphenols due to the high degree of orthogonality associated with these separation modes for various classes of phenolic compounds. However, despite the growing number of such applications, HILIC is almost exclusively used as the first dimension (D) separation mode, and RP-LC in the second dimension (D). This is somewhat surprising in light of the potential advantages of swapping these separation modes. In this contribution, we present a detailed evaluation of the potential of online RP-LC × HILIC-MS for the analysis of phenolic compounds, comparing the performance of this system to the more established HILIC × RP-LC-MS configuration. Method development was performed using a predictive optimisation program, and fixed solvent modulation was employed to combat the solvent incompatibility between HILIC and RP-LC mobile phases. Red wine, rooibos tea, Protea and chestnut phenolic extracts containing a large diversity of phenolic compound classes were analysed by both HILIC × RP-LC- and RP-LC × HILIC-MS in order to compare the separation performance. Overall, the kinetic performance of HILIC × RP-LC was found to be clearly superior, with higher peak capacities and better resolution obtained for the majority of samples compared to RP-LC × HILIC analyses using similar column dimensions. Dilution of the D solvent combined with large volume injections proved insufficient to focus especially phenolic acids in the D HILIC separation, which resulted in severe D peak distortion for these compounds, and negatively impacted on method performance. On the other hand, a noteworthy improvement in the sensitivity of RP-LC × HILIC-MS analyses was observed due to higher ESI-MS response for the D HILIC mobile phase and greater sample loading capacity of the D RP-LC column, brought on by the high solubility of phenolic samples in aqueous solutions. As a result, a significantly higher number of compounds were detected in the RP-LC × HILIC-MS separations. These findings point to the potential advantage of RP-LC × HILIC as a complementary configuration to HILIC × RP-LC for phenolic analysis.
亲水作用色谱法(HILIC)与反相液相色谱法(RP-LC)相结合,已被证明在多酚的二维液相色谱(LC×LC)分析中是有效的,因为这两种分离模式对于各类酚类化合物具有高度的正交性。然而,尽管此类应用的数量不断增加,但HILIC几乎仅用作第一维(D1)分离模式,而RP-LC则用于第二维(D2)分离。鉴于交换这些分离模式可能具有的优势,这有点令人惊讶。在本论文中,我们详细评估了在线RP-LC×HILIC-MS分析酚类化合物的潜力,并将该系统的性能与更成熟的HILIC×RP-LC-MS配置进行了比较。使用预测优化程序进行方法开发,并采用固定溶剂调制来解决HILIC和RP-LC流动相之间的溶剂不相容问题。通过HILIC×RP-LC-MS和RP-LC×HILIC-MS对含有多种酚类化合物的红酒、路易波士茶、山龙眼和栗子酚类提取物进行分析,以比较分离性能。总体而言,发现HILIC×RP-LC的动力学性能明显更优,与使用相似柱尺寸的RP-LC×HILIC分析相比,大多数样品获得了更高的峰容量和更好的分离度。D1溶剂的稀释与大体积进样相结合,被证明不足以在D1 HILIC分离中聚焦尤其是酚酸,这导致这些化合物的D1峰严重变形,并对方法性能产生负面影响。另一方面,观察到RP-LC×HILIC-MS分析的灵敏度有显著提高,这是由于D1 HILIC流动相具有更高的电喷雾质谱(ESI-MS)响应,以及酚类样品在水溶液中的高溶解度使得D2 RP-LC柱具有更大的进样量。结果,在RP-LC×HILIC-MS分离中检测到的化合物数量显著更多。这些发现表明,RP-LC×HILIC作为HILIC×RP-LC用于酚类分析的互补配置具有潜在优势。