Suppr超能文献

IgG4 相关疾病分类和诊断标准的性能及伴或不伴 IgG4 相关疾病患者的比较。

Performance of classification and diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related disease and comparison of patients with and without IgG4-related disease.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 13;13(1):2509. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29645-2.

Abstract

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) was recently described in Japan. It is characterised by extensive organ involvement with tissue fibrosis. We assessed the performance of the 2019 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria and the 2020 revised comprehensive diagnostic (RCD) criteria as well as differences between patients with and without IgG4-RD. In this retrospective, single-centre study of 50 patients admitted with suspected IgG4-RD, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of both criteria. We also compared clinical characteristics and laboratory data of patients with IgG4-RD (n = 42) and patients without IgG4-RD (n = 8). The ACR/EULAR classification criteria had 88.1% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity for IgG4-RD diagnosis. The RCD criteria had 100% sensitivity and 50% specificity. Patients with IgG4-RD had significantly more affected organs (p = 0.002). Patients with a single affected organ and IgG4-RD had significantly higher serum IgG4/IgG ratios (p = 0.027), lower serum C-reactive protein levels (p = 0.020), and lower total haemolytic complement activity (p = 0.044) than those without IgG4-RD. The ACR/EULAR classification criteria have high specificity and the RCD criteria have high sensitivity for diagnosing IgG4-RD. The number of affected organs is important for diagnosing IgG4-RD.

摘要

IgG4 相关疾病(IgG4-RD)最近在日本被描述。它的特征是广泛的器官受累和组织纤维化。我们评估了 2019 年美国风湿病学会(ACR)和欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)分类标准以及 2020 年修订的综合诊断(RCD)标准的性能,以及有和没有 IgG4-RD 的患者之间的差异。在这项回顾性、单中心的 50 例疑似 IgG4-RD 患者研究中,我们评估了这两个标准的敏感性和特异性。我们还比较了 IgG4-RD 患者(n=42)和非 IgG4-RD 患者(n=8)的临床特征和实验室数据。ACR/EULAR 分类标准对 IgG4-RD 的诊断具有 88.1%的敏感性和 87.5%的特异性。RCD 标准的敏感性为 100%,特异性为 50%。IgG4-RD 患者受累器官明显更多(p=0.002)。单一受累器官和 IgG4-RD 患者的血清 IgG4/IgG 比值显著更高(p=0.027),血清 C 反应蛋白水平显著更低(p=0.020),总溶血补体活性显著更低(p=0.044)。ACR/EULAR 分类标准具有高特异性,RCD 标准具有高敏感性,可用于诊断 IgG4-RD。受累器官的数量对 IgG4-RD 的诊断很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a3b/9925424/32069b347a86/41598_2023_29645_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验