Suppr超能文献

青少年可获取的低风险物质使用指南。

Lower-risk substance use guidelines accessible by youth.

机构信息

Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research, University of Victoria, 2300 McKenzie Ave, BC, Victoria, Canada.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Feb 13;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00516-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lower-risk substance use guidelines (LRSUGs) are an evidence-based harm reduction strategy used to provide information to people who use drugs so they can reduce harms associated with substance use.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify LRSUGs accessible to youth and to characterize the recommendations within these guidelines. The overall goal is to identify gaps in current LRSUGs and to inform researchers and policymakers of the kinds of health information youth can access.

METHODS

We conducted a digital assessment using the Google search engine to identify LRSUGs that could be identified by youth when searching for official sources of information related to commonly used substances, including cannabis, caffeine, alcohol, hallucinogens, prescription opioids, nicotine, and/or prescription stimulants. LRSUGs were coded and data were extracted from them to identify gaps.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty LRSUGs were identified; most focused on alcohol (n = 40, 31%), cannabis (n = 30, 23%), and caffeine (n = 21, 16%). LRSUGs provided recommendations about dosing (n = 108, 83%), frequency of use (n = 72, 55%), and when to use (n = 86, 66%). Most LRSUGs were published by health (n = 51, 39%) and third-sector organizations (n = 41, 32%), followed by provincial/state (n = 18, 14%), government (n = 14, 11%), municipal (n = 4, 3%), and academic (n = 2, 2%) sources. Only 16% (n = 21) of LRSUGs were youth-specific and one-quarter (n = 32, 25%) of LRSUGs provided gender-specific recommendations. Most guidelines featured information on short (n = 76, 58%) and long-term (n = 69, 53%) negative effectives and positive effects of substances (n = 56, 43%). Less than half (n = 50, 38%) of LRSUGs cited evidence in support of the information they provided.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several areas in the current LRSUGs for youth that need to be addressed. Among the gaps are a lack of LRSUGs developed specifically for youth, a lack of youth engagement in developing harm reduction strategies centered around them, and a lack of evidence-based LRSUGs. Youth-oriented, evidence-based LRSUGs are needed to better support youth who use substances and help them manage the negative effects of substance use.

摘要

背景

低风险物质使用指南(LRSUG)是一种基于证据的减少伤害策略,用于向吸毒者提供信息,以便他们减少与物质使用相关的伤害。

目的

本研究旨在确定青年可获取的 LRSUG,并描述这些指南中的建议。总体目标是确定当前 LRSUG 中的差距,并向研究人员和政策制定者告知青年可以获得的健康信息种类。

方法

我们使用谷歌搜索引擎进行了数字评估,以确定青年在搜索与常用物质(包括大麻、咖啡因、酒精、迷幻剂、处方类阿片类药物、尼古丁和/或处方兴奋剂)相关的官方信息来源时可以识别的 LRSUG。对 LRSUG 进行编码并从中提取数据以确定差距。

结果

确定了 130 个 LRSUG;其中大多数侧重于酒精(n=40,31%)、大麻(n=30,23%)和咖啡因(n=21,16%)。LRSUG 提供了关于剂量(n=108,83%)、使用频率(n=72,55%)和使用时间(n=86,66%)的建议。大多数 LRSUG 由健康组织(n=51,39%)和第三部门组织(n=41,32%)出版,其次是省级/州级(n=18,14%)、政府(n=14,11%)、市级(n=4,3%)和学术机构(n=2,2%)。只有 16%(n=21)的 LRSUG 是专门针对青年的,四分之一(n=32,25%)的 LRSUG 提供了性别特异性建议。大多数指南都提供了关于短期(n=76,58%)和长期(n=69,53%)负面效应和物质积极效应的信息(n=56,43%)。不到一半(n=50,38%)的 LRSUG 引用了支持其提供信息的证据。

结论

我们确定了当前青年 LRSUG 中需要解决的几个方面。这些差距包括缺乏专门为青年制定的 LRSUG、缺乏青年参与制定以他们为中心的减少伤害策略以及缺乏基于证据的 LRSUG。需要以青年为导向、基于证据的 LRSUG,以更好地支持使用物质的青年,并帮助他们管理物质使用的负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d3/9926657/ed818b02d01c/13011_2023_516_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验