Divisions of Bioethics and Palliative Care.
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Lurie Children's Hospital and Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Pediatrics. 2023 Mar 1;151(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-059447.
Clinician empathy is associated with improved communication and clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that, when clinicians express empathy, families are more likely to deepen discussions, and that clinicians express less empathy in care conferences with language interpretation.
Prospective, mixed methods cohort study of English and interpreted audio-recorded transcripts of care conferences for pediatric patients with serious illness hospitalized at a single urban, quaternary medical institution between January 2018 and January 2021. Directed content analysis identified empathic opportunities, clinician empathetic statements or missed opportunities, and family responses. Clinician empathic statements were "buried" if immediately followed by more clinician medical talk. Descriptive analyses summarized demographics and codes. χ2 analyses summarized differences among language interpretation and family responses.
Twenty-nine patient-family dyads participated. Twenty-two (81%) family members were female. Eleven (39%) used language interpretation (8 Spanish, 2 Vietnamese, 1 Somali). Families created 210 empathic opportunities. Clinicians responded with unburied empathy 80 times (38%, no differences for English versus interpreted care conferences, P = .88). When clinicians buried empathy or missed empathic opportunities, families responded with alliance (agreement, gratitude, or emotional deepening) 14% and 15% of the time, respectively. When clinicians responded with unburied empathy, families responded with alliance 83% of the time (P < .01).
Our study suggests that clinician empathic expression does not differ when language interpretation is used in pediatric care conferences. Clinicians often miss opportunities to express empathy, or they bury it by medical talk. Although unburied empathy created opportunities for relationship-building and family-sharing, buried empathy negatively impacted these domains similarly to no empathic expression.
临床医生的同理心与改善沟通和临床结果有关。我们假设,当临床医生表达同理心时,家属更有可能深入讨论问题,而在有语言翻译的护理会议中,临床医生表达同理心的可能性较小。
前瞻性、混合方法队列研究,纳入 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间在一家单城市四级医疗机构住院的患有重病的儿科患者的英语和口译录音护理会议的英文和口译转录本。定向内容分析确定了同理心机会、临床医生同理心陈述或错失机会以及家庭反应。如果临床医生的同理心陈述紧接着更多的医生医疗谈话,则被认为是“被掩盖”了。描述性分析总结了人口统计学和代码。χ2 分析总结了语言翻译和家庭反应之间的差异。
共有 29 名患者-家属二人组参与了研究。22 名(81%)家属为女性。11 名(39%)使用语言翻译(8 名西班牙语、2 名越南语、1 名索马里语)。家庭共创造了 210 个同理心机会。临床医生未被掩盖的同理心回应了 80 次(38%,英语和口译护理会议之间无差异,P =.88)。当临床医生掩盖同理心或错失同理心机会时,家属以联盟(同意、感激或情感深化)回应的比例分别为 14%和 15%。当临床医生表达未被掩盖的同理心时,家属以联盟回应的比例为 83%(P <.01)。
我们的研究表明,在儿科护理会议中使用语言翻译时,临床医生表达同理心的方式没有差异。临床医生经常错失表达同理心的机会,或者通过医疗谈话将其掩盖。尽管未被掩盖的同理心为建立关系和分享家庭创造了机会,但掩盖同理心与没有同理心表达一样,对这些领域产生了负面影响。