IFT Institut für Therapieforschung, Centre for Mental Health and Addiction Research, Leopoldstraße 175, 80804, Munich, Germany.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;23(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15117-9.
Given low utilization by individuals experiencing gambling problems the potential of self-exclusion (SE) might be not fully exploited in Germany. This paper aims to gain insight into different actors' perceptions and reflections on the problems and difficulties in the process of self-exclusion to delineate which specific attitudes hamper a successful implementation of SE.
13 individual and four group interviews with individuals experiencing gambling problems and governmental or commercial gambling providers were examined. A Grounded Theory Approach was used to portray the opinions of these different actors on existing regulations of SE and to delineate potentially diverging interests between the distinct groups.
The interviewees agreed on the usefulness of SE and consented that it is important to early recognize individuals experiencing gambling problems. They also considered the present practice insufficient but for different reasons. Individuals experiencing gambling problems and providers particularly disagreed on addressing individuals experiencing gambling problems. While individuals experiencing gambling problems stated that they had hardly ever been approached, providers argued that help offers were mostly rejected. Especially commercial providers also regarded insufficient German language skills and rapid fluctuation of guests as strong barriers to approaching individuals experiencing gambling problems. Interviewees from governmental venues furthermore suspected that commercial providers took addressing individuals experiencing gambling problems less seriously.
Our results emphasize the dilemma of conflicting interests in both individuals experiencing gambling problems and providers. Rather than acting against the economic interests of employers, venue staff blame individuals experiencing gambling problems for lack of problem recognition. Conversely, individuals experiencing gambling problems blame the providers for not offering help. To address individuals experiencing gambling problems appropriate staff training is required, and SE regulations need to be controlled by an independent body rather than by the providers themselves.
鉴于德国个人赌博问题的低使用率,自我排除(SE)的潜力可能尚未得到充分利用。本文旨在深入了解不同参与者对自我排除过程中问题和困难的看法和反思,以明确哪些特定态度阻碍了 SE 的成功实施。
对 13 名个人和 4 名团体访谈进行了检查,这些访谈对象是有赌博问题的个人以及政府或商业赌博提供商。采用扎根理论方法来描绘这些不同参与者对 SE 现有法规的看法,并描绘不同群体之间潜在的利益分歧。
受访者一致认为 SE 有用,并同意早期识别有赌博问题的个人很重要。他们还认为目前的做法不足,但原因不同。有赌博问题的个人和提供商特别不同意解决有赌博问题的个人。虽然有赌博问题的个人表示他们几乎从未被接触过,但提供商认为帮助提供的机会大多被拒绝了。特别是商业提供商还认为,德语水平不足和客人的快速波动是接触有赌博问题的个人的强大障碍。政府场所的受访者还怀疑商业提供商对解决有赌博问题的个人不够重视。
我们的研究结果强调了个人和提供商之间利益冲突的困境。场地工作人员不是为了反对雇主的经济利益,而是指责有赌博问题的个人缺乏问题识别能力。相反,有赌博问题的个人则指责提供商没有提供帮助。为了接触有赌博问题的个人,需要进行适当的员工培训,SE 法规需要由独立机构而不是提供商自己来控制。