• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于乳牙龋齿的质量调整生命年代理:离散选择实验。

Quality-Adjusted Life Year Proxies for Caries in Primary Dentition: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

机构信息

Institute for Health & Aging, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Center to Address Disparities in Children's Oral Health, Department of Preventive Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

JDR Clin Trans Res. 2024 Jan;9(1):85-94. doi: 10.1177/23800844221149337. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1177/23800844221149337
PMID:36789915
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10850881/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cost-utility analysis (CUA)-a method to evaluate intervention cost-effectiveness-transforms benefits of alternatives into a measure of quantity and quality of life, such as quality-adjusted life year (QALY), to enable comparison across heterogeneous programs. Measurement challenges prevent directly estimating utilities and calculating QALYs for caries in primary dentition. Proxy disease QALYs are often used as a substitute; however, there lacks quantitative evidence that these proxy diseases are comparable to caries.

OBJECTIVE

To employ a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to quantitatively determine the most comparable proxy disease for different levels of caries in primary dentition.

METHODS

A cross-sectional DCE survey was administered to respondents ( = 461) who resided in California, were aged ≥18 y, and were primary caretakers for ≥1 child aged 3 to 12 y. Four attributes were included: pain level, disease duration, treatment cost, and family life impacts. Mixed effects logistic regression and conditional logistic regression were used to analyze the survey data.

RESULTS

Respondents from the overall sample preferred no pain over mild (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, < 0.05), moderate (OR = 0.57, < 0.05), and severe pain (OR = 0.48, < 0.05). Acute gastritis (OR = 0.44, < 0.05), chronic gastritis (OR = 0.31, < 0.01), and cold sore (OR = 0.38, < 0.05) were less preferred than stage 1 caries. Acute tonsilitis (OR = 0.43, < 0.05), acute gastritis (OR = 0.38, < 0.05), chronic gastritis (OR = 0.26, < 0.01), and cold sore (OR = 0.33, < 0.01) were less preferred than stage 2 caries. Chronic gastritis (OR = 0.42, < 0.05) was less preferred than stage 4 caries.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents viewed the characteristics of many diseases with similar QALYs differently. Findings suggest that otitis media and its QALY-as commonly used in CUAs-may be a suitable proxy disease and substitute. However, other disease states with slightly different QALYs may be suitable. As such, the recommendation is to consider a range of proxy diseases and their QALYs when conducting a CUA for child caries interventions.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT

This study reviews and systematically compares pediatric diseases that are comparable to caries in primary dentition. The findings may inform future research using cost-utility analysis to examine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of interventions to prevent and treat caries as compared with an alternative.

摘要

介绍

成本效用分析(CUA)——一种评估干预措施成本效益的方法——将替代方案的效益转化为衡量生命数量和质量的指标,例如质量调整生命年(QALY),从而能够在异质方案之间进行比较。测量挑战阻止了对效用的直接估计,并计算了乳牙龋齿的 QALY。代理疾病 QALY 通常被用作替代品;然而,缺乏定量证据表明这些代理疾病与龋齿具有可比性。

目的

采用离散选择实验(DCE)来定量确定乳牙龋齿不同程度的最可比代理疾病。

方法

对居住在加利福尼亚州、年龄≥18 岁且是 3 至 12 岁儿童主要照顾者的 461 名受访者进行了横断面 DCE 调查。包括四个属性:疼痛程度、疾病持续时间、治疗成本和家庭生活影响。使用混合效应逻辑回归和条件逻辑回归分析调查数据。

结果

来自总体样本的受访者更喜欢没有疼痛而不是轻度(比值比 [OR] = 0.50,<0.05)、中度(OR = 0.57,<0.05)和重度疼痛(OR = 0.48,<0.05)。急性胃炎(OR = 0.44,<0.05)、慢性胃炎(OR = 0.31,<0.01)和唇疱疹(OR = 0.38,<0.05)比第 1 阶段龋齿的选择度低。急性扁桃体炎(OR = 0.43,<0.05)、急性胃炎(OR = 0.38,<0.05)、慢性胃炎(OR = 0.26,<0.01)和唇疱疹(OR = 0.33,<0.01)比第 2 阶段龋齿的选择度低。慢性胃炎(OR = 0.42,<0.05)比第 4 阶段龋齿的选择度低。

结论

父母对具有相似 QALY 的许多疾病的特征有不同的看法。研究结果表明,中耳炎及其 QALY——通常在 CUA 中使用——可能是一种合适的代理疾病和替代品。然而,其他 QALY 略有不同的疾病状态也可能是合适的。因此,建议在进行儿童龋齿干预措施的成本效用分析时,考虑一系列代理疾病及其 QALY。

知识转移陈述

本研究回顾并系统比较了与乳牙龋齿具有可比性的儿科疾病。研究结果可能为未来使用成本效用分析来检验预防和治疗龋齿的干预措施的增量成本效益比提供信息,而不是替代方案。

相似文献

1
Quality-Adjusted Life Year Proxies for Caries in Primary Dentition: A Discrete Choice Experiment.用于乳牙龋齿的质量调整生命年代理:离散选择实验。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2024 Jan;9(1):85-94. doi: 10.1177/23800844221149337. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health.质量调整生命年在儿科护理中缺乏质量:对已发表的儿童健康成本效用研究的批判性综述。
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):e600-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2127.
3
Exploring the cost-effectiveness of child dental caries prevention programmes. Are we comparing apples and oranges?探索儿童龋齿预防项目的成本效益。我们是在进行不恰当的比较吗?
Evid Based Dent. 2020 Mar;21(1):5-7. doi: 10.1038/s41432-020-0085-7.
4
Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: are QALYs contraindicated?儿科经济评价中健康状态估值的挑战:QALYs 是否被禁止?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Aug;29(8):641-52. doi: 10.2165/11591570-000000000-00000.
5
Adolescent valuation of CARIES-QC-U: a child-centred preference-based measure of dental caries.青少年对 CARIES-QC-U 的评估:一种以儿童为中心的基于偏好的龋齿测量方法。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 3;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01918-w.
6
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of the Dental RECUR Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial: Evaluating a Goal-oriented Talking Intervention to Prevent Reoccurrence of Dental Caries in Children.牙科 RECUR 实用随机对照试验的成本效益分析:评估一种以目标为导向的谈话干预措施,以预防儿童龋齿复发。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 May;20(3):431-445. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00720-5. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
7
Valuation study for a preference-based quality of life measure for dental caries (Dental Caries Utility Index - DCUI) among Australian adolescents - study protocol.用于评估澳大利亚青少年龋齿(龋齿效用指数-DCUI)偏好的生活质量量表的价值研究-研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 21;10(10):e038626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038626.
8
Micro-invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth.用于治疗乳牙和恒牙近端龋齿的微创干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 5;2015(11):CD010431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010431.pub2.
9
Interventions with pregnant women, new mothers and other primary caregivers for preventing early childhood caries.干预孕妇、新妈妈和其他主要照顾者以预防幼儿龋齿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 16;5(5):CD012155. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012155.pub3.
10
WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.撤回:用于治疗乳牙龋齿的牙科填充物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 17;10(10):CD004483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004483.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Conjoint Analysis to Determine Patient Preferences for Surgical Treatment of Urethral Stricture Disease.运用联合分析确定患者对尿道狭窄疾病手术治疗的偏好。
J Particip Med. 2017;9. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
2
Study Protocol for an Online Questionnaire Survey on Symptoms/Signs, Protective Measures, Level of Awareness and Perception Regarding COVID-19 Outbreak among Dentists. A Global Survey.《针对牙医群体中 COVID-19 疫情相关症状/体征、防护措施、认知度和感知度的在线问卷调查研究方案》。一项全球性调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 3;17(15):5598. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155598.
3
The cost-utility of school-based first permanent molar sealants programs: a Markov model.基于学校的第一恒磨牙窝沟封闭计划的成本-效用:一个马尔可夫模型。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Dec 30;19(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0990-3.
4
The construct validity of the Child Health Utility 9D-DK instrument.儿童健康效用 9D-DK 量表的构建效度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Dec 23;17(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1256-0.
5
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
6
The use of cost-utility analysis for the evaluation of caries prevention: an exploratory case study of two community-based public health interventions in a high-risk population in the UK.成本效用分析在龋齿预防评估中的应用:对英国高危人群两项基于社区的公共卫生干预措施的探索性案例研究
Community Dent Health. 2018 Mar 1;35(1):30-36. doi: 10.1922/CDH_4115Owen07.
7
Who Wants Long-Term Care Insurance? A Stated Preference Survey of Attitudes, Beliefs, and Characteristics.谁需要长期护理保险?一项关于态度、信念和特征的陈述偏好调查。
Inquiry. 2016 Aug 16;53. doi: 10.1177/0046958016663728. Print 2016.
8
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
Relative cost-effectiveness of home visits and telephone contacts in preventing early childhood caries.家访和电话联系在预防幼儿龋齿方面的相对成本效益
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;43(6):560-8. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12181. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
10
Eliciting community preferences for complementary micro health insurance: a discrete choice experiment in rural Malawi. eliciting community preferences for complementary micro health insurance: a discrete choice experiment in rural Malawi.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:160-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Sep 16.