• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

清洁供暖政策能否减少碳排放?来自中国北方的证据。

Can the Clean Heating Policy reduce carbon emissions? Evidence from northern China.

机构信息

School of Applied Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China.

School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(17):50096-50109. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25885-x. Epub 2023 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-25885-x
PMID:36790712
Abstract

The Clean Heating Policy aims to solve the problems of excessive energy consumption and severe air pollution caused by central heating in northern China. Whether this policy can effectively reduce carbon emissions remains unexplored. Using panel data representing 65 cities in northern China from 2010 to 2019, this paper constructs a dynamic spatial DID model to empirically study the carbon reduction effect of the Clean Heating Policy and its influence channels. The results are summarized as follows. First, the Clean Heating Policy can significantly reduce carbon emissions, and this conclusion holds after multiple robustness tests. The policy has a lag effect, but its spatial spillover effect and long-term effect are not significant. Second, the carbon reduction effect of the Clean Heating Policy is mainly achieved by optimizing the energy structure and improving the thermal efficiency of heat consumer terminals. Third, the carbon reduction effect varies by city and emission field. It is significant only in low-subsidy cities, high-carbon cities, and household fields. Fourth, there is a synergistic reduction relationship between the Clean Heating Policy and the low-carbon city policy. Based on the results of this paper, we propose policy implications, such as promoting policies in multiple ways and improving subsidy efficiency, and provide a reference for other countries.

摘要

清洁供暖政策旨在解决中国北方集中供暖所导致的能源消耗过度和空气污染严重的问题。该政策能否有效减少碳排放仍有待探讨。本文利用 2010-2019 年中国北方 65 个城市的面板数据,构建动态空间 DID 模型,实证研究了清洁供暖政策的碳减排效应及其影响渠道。结果表明:第一,清洁供暖政策能够显著降低碳排放,且该结论在经过多次稳健性检验后依然成立;该政策具有滞后效应,但空间溢出效应和长期效应不显著。第二,清洁供暖政策的碳减排效应主要通过优化能源结构和提高热用户终端的热力效率来实现。第三,清洁供暖政策的碳减排效应因城市和排放场而异,仅在低补贴城市、高碳城市和家庭领域显著。第四,清洁供暖政策与低碳城市政策之间存在协同减排关系。基于本文的研究结果,我们提出了多种政策推动方式和提高补贴效率等政策建议,为其他国家提供了参考。

相似文献

1
Can the Clean Heating Policy reduce carbon emissions? Evidence from northern China.清洁供暖政策能否减少碳排放?来自中国北方的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(17):50096-50109. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25885-x. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
Assessing the low-carbon city pilot policy on carbon emission from consumption and production in China: how underlying mechanism and spatial spillover effect?评估中国低碳城市试点政策对消费和生产碳排放的影响:潜在机制和空间溢出效应如何?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(47):71958-71977. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21005-3. Epub 2022 May 24.
3
Will carbon trading reduce spatial inequality? A spatial analysis of 200 cities in China.碳排放交易能否缩小空间不平等?对中国 200 个城市的空间分析。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 1;325(Pt A):116402. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116402. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
4
The effect of the pilot free trade zone policy on carbon emissions: evidence from China.自由贸易试验区政策对碳排放的影响:来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(38):89510-89520. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28612-8. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
5
Can China's carbon generalized system of preferences reduce urban residents' carbon emissions? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment.中国碳普惠体系能否降低城镇居民碳排放?来自准自然实验的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;362:121222. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121222. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
6
How does digital technology promote carbon emission reduction? Empirical evidence based on e-commerce pilot city policy in China.数字技术如何促进碳排放减排?基于中国电子商务试点城市政策的实证证据。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 1;325(Pt A):116524. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116524. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
7
Village energy survey reveals missing rural raw coal in northern China: Significance in science and policy.村庄能源调查揭示中国北方农村原煤缺失:科学与政策意义。
Environ Pollut. 2017 Apr;223:705-712. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
8
Blue sky defense in low-carbon pilot cities: A spatial spillover perspective of carbon emission efficiency.低碳试点城市蓝天保卫战:碳排放效率的空间溢出视角
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 10;846:157509. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157509. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
9
Co-Benefits of China's Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme: Impact Mechanism and Spillover Effect.中国碳排放权交易计划的协同效益:影响机制与溢出效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053792.
10
The diminishing effects of winter heating on air quality in northern China.冬季供暖对中国北方空气质量的影响正在减弱。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 1;325(Pt B):116536. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116536. Epub 2022 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of household solid fuel use on sarcopenia in middle-aged and older adults: evidence from a nationwide cohort study.家用固体燃料使用对中年及以上成年人肌肉减少症的影响:来自全国队列研究的证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;12:1337979. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1337979. eCollection 2024.