Suppr超能文献

理解家族癌症病史采集和健康信息搜索的过程。

Understanding the Process of Family Cancer History Collection and Health Information Seeking.

机构信息

Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2023 Oct;50(5):572-585. doi: 10.1177/10901981231152430. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

Abstract

PROBLEM ADDRESSED

To better understand the factors associated with family cancer history (FCH) information and cancer information seeking, we model the process an individual undergoes when assessing whether to gather FCH and seek cancer information and compare models by sociodemographics and family history of cancer. We used cross-sectional data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5, Cycle 2) and variables (e.g., emotion and self-efficacy) associated with the Theory of Motivated Information Management to assess the process of FCH gathering and information seeking. We completed path analysis to assess the process of FCH gathering and stratified path models.

RESULTS

Those who felt they could lower their chances of getting cancer (emotion) were more confident in their ability to complete FCH on a medical form (self-efficacy; = 0.11, < .0001) and more likely to have discussed FCH with family members ( = 0.07, < .0001). Those who were more confident in their ability to complete a summary of their family history on a medical form were more likely to have discussed FCH with family members ( = 0.34, < .0001) and seek other health information ( = 0.24, < .0001). Stratified models showed differences in this process by age, race/ethnicity, and family history of cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH AND PRACTICE

Tailoring outreach and education strategies to address differences in perceived ability to lower chances of getting cancer (emotion) and confidence in the ability to complete FCH (self-efficacy) could help encourage less engaged individuals to learn about their FCH and gather cancer information.

摘要

问题描述

为了更好地理解与家族癌症史(FCH)信息和癌症信息搜索相关的因素,我们构建了个体在评估是否收集 FCH 和寻求癌症信息时所经历的过程模型,并按社会人口统计学和癌症家族史对模型进行了比较。我们使用来自健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS 5,第 2 周期)的横断面数据和与动机信息管理理论相关的变量(例如,情绪和自我效能感)来评估 FCH 收集和信息搜索的过程。我们完成了路径分析来评估 FCH 收集和分层路径模型的过程。

结果

那些认为自己能够降低患癌症风险的人(情绪)对自己在医疗表格上完成 FCH 的能力更有信心(自我效能感; = 0.11,<.0001),并且更有可能与家人讨论 FCH( = 0.07,<.0001)。那些对自己在医疗表格上完成家族病史摘要的能力更有信心的人,更有可能与家人讨论 FCH( = 0.34,<.0001)并寻求其他健康信息( = 0.24,<.0001)。分层模型显示,该过程在年龄、种族/民族和癌症家族史方面存在差异。

对公共卫生研究和实践的启示

针对降低患癌症风险的能力(情绪)和对完成 FCH 的能力的信心(自我效能感)的感知差异,调整外展和教育策略,可以帮助鼓励参与度较低的个体了解自己的 FCH 并收集癌症信息。

相似文献

10
Self-efficacy to Get Cancer-Related Information or Advice.获取癌症相关信息或建议的自我效能感。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1330-1337. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02266-z. Epub 2023 Jan 28.

本文引用的文献

3
Precision Prevention and Early Detection of Cancer: Fundamental Principles.精准预防和癌症早期检测:基本原则。
Cancer Discov. 2018 Jul;8(7):803-811. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-1415. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
5
Emotion, health decision making, and health behaviour.情绪、健康决策与健康行为。
Psychol Health. 2018 Jan;33(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1385787.
7
Avoiding cancer risk information.避免接触癌症风险信息。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.058. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
8
Social determinants of family health history collection.家庭健康史收集的社会决定因素。
J Community Genet. 2016 Jan;7(1):57-64. doi: 10.1007/s12687-015-0251-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验