Suppr超能文献

血糖风险指数评估在儿科和成年 1 型糖尿病患者队列中。

Glycemia Risk Index Assessment in a Pediatric and Adult Patient Cohort With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

机构信息

Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Centro de Investigación de Endocrinologia y Nutricion Clinica (CIENC). Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valladolid,., Valladolid, Spain.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1063-1069. doi: 10.1177/19322968231154561. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the glycemia risk index (GRI) as a new glucometry in pediatric and adult populations with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in clinical practice.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of 202 patients with T1D receiving intensive treatment with insulin (25.2% continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) and intermittent scanning (flash) glucose monitoring (isCGM). Clinical and glucometric isCGM data were collected, as well as the component of hypoglycemia (CHypo) and component of hyperglycemia (CHyper) of the GRI.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients (53% males and 67.8% adults) with a mean age of 28.6 ± 15.7 years and 12.5 ± 10.9 years of T1D evolution were evaluated.Adult patients (>19 years) presented higher glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (7.4 ± 1.1 vs 6.7 ± 0.6%; < .01) and lower time in range (TIR) (55.4 ± 17.5 vs 66.5 ± 13.1%; < .01) values than the pediatric population, with lower coefficient of variation (CV) (38.6 ± 7.2 vs 42.4 ± 8.9%; < .05). The GRI was significantly lower in pediatric patients (48.0 ± 22.2 vs 56.8 ± 23.4; < .05) associated with higher CHypo (7.1 ± 5.1 vs 5.0 ± 4.5; < .01) and lower CHyper (16.8 ± 9.8 vs 26.5 ± 15.1; < .01) than in adults.When analyzing treatment with CSII compared with multiple doses of insulin (MDI), a nonsignificant trend to a lower GRI was observed in CSII (51.0 ± 15.3 vs 55.0 ± 25.4; = .162), with higher levels of CHypo (6.5 ± 4.1 vs 5.4 ± 5.0; < .01) and lower CHyper (19.6 ± 10.6 vs 24.6 ± 15.2; < .05) compared with MDI.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients and in those with CSII treatment, despite a better control by classical and GRI parameters, higher overall CHypo was observed than in adults and MDI, respectively. The present study supports the usefulness of the GRI as a new glucometric parameter to evaluate the global risk of hypoglycemia-hyperglycemia in both pediatric and adult patients with T1D.

摘要

背景

评估血糖风险指数(GRI)作为一种新的葡萄糖检测方法,用于评估儿科和成人 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者的临床实践。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,共纳入 202 例接受胰岛素强化治疗(25.2%持续皮下胰岛素输注[CSII])和间歇性扫描(闪光)血糖监测(isCGM)的 T1D 患者。收集临床和葡萄糖 isCGM 数据,以及 GRI 的低血糖(CHypo)和高血糖(CHyper)成分。

结果

共评估了 202 例患者(53%为男性,67.8%为成年人),平均年龄为 28.6±15.7 岁和 12.5±10.9 岁,平均 T1D 病程为 12.5±10.9 年。成人(>19 岁)患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)(7.4±1.1%比 6.7±0.6%;<.01)和时间在目标范围内(TIR)(55.4±17.5%比 66.5±13.1%;<.01)值低于儿科人群,变异系数(CV)(38.6±7.2%比 42.4±8.9%;<.05)较低。儿科患者的 GRI 显著低于成人(48.0±22.2 比 56.8±23.4;<.05),与更高的 CHypo(7.1±5.1 比 5.0±4.5;<.01)和更低的 CHyper(16.8±9.8 比 26.5±15.1;<.01)有关。与多次胰岛素注射(MDI)相比,分析 CSII 治疗时,CSII 组的 GRI 呈下降趋势,但无统计学意义(51.0±15.3 比 55.0±25.4;=162),CHypo 水平较高(6.5±4.1 比 5.4±5.0;<.01),CHyper 水平较低(19.6±10.6 比 24.6±15.2;<.05)。

结论

在儿科患者和接受 CSII 治疗的患者中,尽管经典参数和 GRI 均显示出更好的控制,但与成人和 MDI 相比,CHypo 的总体发生率更高。本研究支持 GRI 作为一种新的葡萄糖检测参数,用于评估儿科和成人 T1D 患者的低血糖-高血糖整体风险。

相似文献

1
Glycemia Risk Index Assessment in a Pediatric and Adult Patient Cohort With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1063-1069. doi: 10.1177/19322968231154561. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
3
Impact of glucose variability on the assessment of the glycemia risk index (GRI) and classic glycemic metrics.
Endocrine. 2023 Dec;82(3):560-568. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03511-7. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
Hybrid Closed-Loop Versus Manual Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis Using the Glycemia Risk Index.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):764-770. doi: 10.1177/19322968241231307. Epub 2024 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

2
Impact of flash glucose monitoring on quality of life and glycaemic control parameters in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus⋆.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2022 May;69(5):345-353. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 May 13.
3
A Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Validated by Clinician Ratings.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Sep;17(5):1226-1242. doi: 10.1177/19322968221085273. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
4
7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S97-S112. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S007.
5
6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S83-S96. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S006.
6
The relationship between glycosylated hemoglobin, time-in-range and glycemic variability in type 1 diabetes patients under flash glucose monitoring.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2021 Aug-Sep;68(7):465-471. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2021.11.006. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
8
Choice of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems May Affect Metrics: Clinically Relevant Differences in Times in Ranges.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2022 May;130(5):343-350. doi: 10.1055/a-1347-2550. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
9
Flash glucose monitoring (FGM): A clinical review on glycaemic outcomes and impact on quality of life.
J Diabetes Complications. 2020 Jun;34(6):107559. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107559. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
10
Role of Composite Glycemic Indices: A Comparison of the Comprehensive Glucose Pentagon Across Diabetes Types and HbA1c Levels.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Feb;22(2):103-111. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0277. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验