• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从血糖风险指数和达标时间的角度评估血糖变异性及其与接受传感器增强型胰岛素泵治疗的儿科患者糖化血红蛋白 A1c 的相关性。

Glycemic variability through the perspective of the glycemia risk index and time in range and their association with glycated hemoglobin A1c in pediatric patients on sensor-augmented pump therapy.

机构信息

Pediatric Clinic, University Clinical Center of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Pediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 18;15:1388245. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1388245. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fendo.2024.1388245
PMID:38957442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11217307/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

From the introduction of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in treatments of type 1 diabetes, particularly its integration with insulin pumps, there has been a quest for new parameters that describe optimal glycemic control. As of the consensus reached in 2019, the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) has become the standard, with time in range (TIR) emerging as a fundamental parameter for metabolic control assessment. However, with technological advancements, new parameters, such as the glycemia risk index (GRI), have been introduced and clinically utilized. Therefore, exploring the relationships between traditional and novel parameters to understand metabolic control comprehensively is imperative.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at the Pediatric Clinic of the University Hospital of the Republic of Srpska Banja Luka between January and July 2023. The participants were randomly selected, with the inclusion criteria specifying an age greater than eight years and a diabetes type 1 duration exceeding two years. All participants were required to use a sensor-augmented insulin pump for the next three months (90 days), irrespective of prior use, with the suspend-before-low option activated.

RESULTS

Of the 35 participants, 30 completed the study, 14 (46.7%) of whom were male. The mean age of the subjects was 14.90 ± 2.88 years, and the mean duration of diabetes was 7.83 ± 4.76 years. Over the 90-day period, HbA1c increased to an average of 7.31%. The analysis revealed significant effects of TIR (β=-0.771) and GRI (β=0.651) on HbA1c. Furthermore, GRI and TIR strongly correlated (β=-0.953).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

New parameters generated from the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) can help clinicians create a complete picture of a patient's metabolic control in relation to HbA1c levels. Additionally, the GRI is a mathematically tailored parameter that incorporates all components of the ambulatory glucose profile and demonstrates strong correlations with laboratory-measured HbA1c and TIR. The GRI potentially can become a valuable statistical parameter for evaluating and managing patients in routine clinical practice.

摘要

简介

自 1 型糖尿病治疗中引入连续血糖监测(CGM),特别是与胰岛素泵的整合以来,人们一直在寻找新的参数来描述最佳血糖控制。截至 2019 年达成的共识,动态血糖谱(AGP)已成为标准,TIR 作为代谢控制评估的基本参数出现。然而,随着技术的进步,已经引入了新的参数,如血糖风险指数(GRI),并在临床上得到了应用。因此,探索传统和新型参数之间的关系,全面了解代谢控制是至关重要的。

材料和方法

本研究于 2023 年 1 月至 7 月在塞族共和国巴尼亚卢卡大学医院的儿科诊所进行。参与者是随机选择的,纳入标准为年龄大于 8 岁,1 型糖尿病病程超过 2 年。所有参与者均被要求在接下来的三个月(90 天)内使用传感器增强型胰岛素泵,无论之前是否使用过,均激活低电量暂停功能。

结果

在 35 名参与者中,有 30 名完成了研究,其中 14 名(46.7%)为男性。受试者的平均年龄为 14.90 ± 2.88 岁,糖尿病病程的平均时间为 7.83 ± 4.76 年。在 90 天期间,HbA1c 升高至平均 7.31%。分析显示 TIR(β=-0.771)和 GRI(β=0.651)对 HbA1c 有显著影响。此外,GRI 和 TIR 之间存在强烈的相关性(β=-0.953)。

讨论和结论

从动态血糖谱(AGP)生成的新参数可以帮助临床医生根据 HbA1c 水平全面了解患者的代谢控制情况。此外,GRI 是一个数学上量身定制的参数,它结合了动态血糖谱的所有成分,并与实验室测量的 HbA1c 和 TIR 显示出强烈的相关性。GRI 有可能成为评估和管理常规临床实践中患者的有价值的统计参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2f/11217307/8deda7d36361/fendo-15-1388245-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2f/11217307/dce723f6a030/fendo-15-1388245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2f/11217307/56d6772be038/fendo-15-1388245-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2f/11217307/8deda7d36361/fendo-15-1388245-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2f/11217307/dce723f6a030/fendo-15-1388245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2f/11217307/56d6772be038/fendo-15-1388245-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df2f/11217307/8deda7d36361/fendo-15-1388245-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Glycemic variability through the perspective of the glycemia risk index and time in range and their association with glycated hemoglobin A1c in pediatric patients on sensor-augmented pump therapy.从血糖风险指数和达标时间的角度评估血糖变异性及其与接受传感器增强型胰岛素泵治疗的儿科患者糖化血红蛋白 A1c 的相关性。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 18;15:1388245. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1388245. eCollection 2024.
2
Hybrid Closed-Loop Versus Manual Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis Using the Glycemia Risk Index.1 型糖尿病成人患者的混合闭环与手动胰岛素输注:使用血糖风险指数的事后分析。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):764-770. doi: 10.1177/19322968241231307. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
3
Utility of time in tight range (TITR) in evaluating metabolic control in pediatric and adult patients with type 1 diabetes in treatment with advanced hybrid closed-loop systems.时间在紧密范围内(TITR)在评估使用先进混合闭环系统治疗的 1 型糖尿病儿科和成年患者代谢控制中的作用。
Endocrine. 2024 Nov;86(2):539-545. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03881-6. Epub 2024 May 30.
4
Glycemia Risk Index Assessment in a Pediatric and Adult Patient Cohort With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.血糖风险指数评估在儿科和成年 1 型糖尿病患者队列中。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1063-1069. doi: 10.1177/19322968231154561. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
5
Impact on Glycemia Risk Index and other metrics in type 1 adult patients switching to Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop systems: a one-year real-life experience.1 型成年患者切换至高级混合闭环系统对血糖风险指数和其他指标的影响:一年真实世界经验。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 15;29(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01946-w.
6
Individualization of recommendations from the international consensus on continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics in Japanese children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.国际共识推荐指标在日本 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年中的个体化应用。
Endocr J. 2020 Oct 28;67(10):1055-1062. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ20-0193. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
7
Incremental value of continuous glucose monitoring when starting pump therapy in patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: the RealTrend study.在血糖控制不佳的 1 型糖尿病患者起始泵治疗时连续血糖监测的增量价值:RealTrend 研究。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Dec;32(12):2245-50. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0750. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
8
The Relationship of Hemoglobin A1C to Time-in-Range in Patients with Diabetes.血红蛋白 A1C 与糖尿病患者达标时间的关系。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Feb;21(2):81-85. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0310. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
9
Beyond HbA1c.超越糖化血红蛋白。
J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;9(12):1052-1053. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12590. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
10
Frequent scanning using flash glucose monitoring contributes to better glycemic control in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.频繁使用瞬感血糖监测有助于改善 1 型糖尿病患儿和青少年的血糖控制。
J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Jan;13(1):185-190. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13618. Epub 2021 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Glycemia risk index (GRI): a metric designed to facilitate the interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: a narrative review.血糖风险指数(GRI):一种旨在促进对连续血糖监测数据进行解读的指标:叙述性综述
J Endocrinol Invest. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s40618-025-02609-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of glucose variability on the assessment of the glycemia risk index (GRI) and classic glycemic metrics.血糖变异性对血糖风险指数(GRI)和经典血糖指标评估的影响。
Endocrine. 2023 Dec;82(3):560-568. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03511-7. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
2
Correlation between Estimated Average Glucose Levels Calculated from HbA1c Values and Random Blood Glucose Levels in a Cohort of Subjects.一组受试者中根据糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)值计算的估计平均血糖水平与随机血糖水平之间的相关性。
J Lab Physicians. 2022 Oct 20;15(2):217-223. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757719. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
The significance of coefficient of variation as a measure of hypoglycaemia risk and glycaemic control in real world users of the automated insulin delivery MiniMed 780G system.
变异系数作为衡量自动化胰岛素输送系统 MiniMed 780G 在真实世界使用者中低血糖风险和血糖控制的指标的意义。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Sep;25(9):2545-2552. doi: 10.1111/dom.15139. Epub 2023 May 29.
4
Glycemic Control by Treatment Modalities: National Registry-Based Population Data in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.不同治疗方式对血糖的控制作用:基于国家注册登记系统的 1 型糖尿病患儿及青少年人群数据分析
Horm Res Paediatr. 2024;97(1):70-79. doi: 10.1159/000530833. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Glycemia Risk Index Assessment in a Pediatric and Adult Patient Cohort With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.血糖风险指数评估在儿科和成年 1 型糖尿病患者队列中。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1063-1069. doi: 10.1177/19322968231154561. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
6
Abridged for Primary Care Providers.为初级保健提供者节略。
Clin Diabetes. 2022 Winter;41(1):4-31. doi: 10.2337/cd23-as01. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
7
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Assessment and management of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with diabetes.《国际儿童青少年糖尿病学会(ISPAD)2022年临床实践共识指南:糖尿病儿童和青少年低血糖的评估与管理》
Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Dec;23(8):1322-1340. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13443.
8
Continuous glucose monitoring and metrics for clinical trials: an international consensus statement.连续血糖监测及其临床试验指标:国际共识声明。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Jan;11(1):42-57. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00319-9. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
9
Fear of hypoglycemia-An underestimated problem.低血糖恐惧:一个被低估的问题。
Brain Behav. 2022 Jul;12(7):e2633. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2633. Epub 2022 May 27.
10
A Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Validated by Clinician Ratings.经临床医生评估验证的用于连续血糖监测的低血糖和高血糖血糖风险指数(GRI)。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Sep;17(5):1226-1242. doi: 10.1177/19322968221085273. Epub 2022 Mar 29.