Quaak M J, Van der Voort P J, Westerman R F, Hasman A, van Bemmel J H
Dept. of Medical Informatics, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Biomed Comput. 1987 Nov;21(3-4):287-98. doi: 10.1016/0020-7101(87)90094-8.
In this study it was investigated in quantitative terms how patient reactions were on automated history-taking. The study is part of a comprehensive project, in which also physicians participated in the validation of such computerized medical records. In total 99 patients, visiting the outpatient clinic of Internal Medicine for the first time, took part in this in-depth study, in which they could express themselves via an interactive and modified terminal and keyboard. The questionnaire that was used in the system contains 28 different screens. Patient complaints are entered together with data on frequency, severity, onset, and duration. The patient may indicate his physical complaints on a stylized picture of the human body. Of the 99 patients, 67 answered the full questionnaire, and another 16 the main part. On the average, 66 min were needed. Younger patients do complete the history in a significantly shorter time than older patients, resulting in relatively more completed histories for the younger group. Quick patients answered on the average 3.5 questions per minute, the slow patients only 2.5. This was strongly correlated with patient familiarization, that has also been investigated: patients who had a quick familiarization were able to finish within 50 min. Patients who needed no help at all in using the system had even answering rates of 3.9/min.
在本研究中,对患者对自动病史采集的反应进行了定量调查。该研究是一个综合项目的一部分,医生也参与了此类计算机化病历的验证。共有99名首次到内科门诊就诊的患者参与了这项深入研究,他们可以通过交互式改良终端和键盘表达自己的想法。系统中使用的问卷包含28个不同的屏幕。患者的主诉与频率、严重程度、发作和持续时间的数据一起录入。患者可以在人体的程式化图片上指出自己的身体不适。99名患者中,67人回答了完整问卷,另有16人回答了主要部分。平均需要66分钟。年轻患者完成病史采集的时间明显短于老年患者,因此年轻组完成的病史相对较多。速度快的患者平均每分钟回答3.5个问题,速度慢的患者每分钟仅回答2.5个问题。这与患者的熟悉程度密切相关,对此也进行了调查:熟悉速度快的患者能够在50分钟内完成。在使用系统时完全不需要帮助的患者回答问题的速度甚至达到每分钟3.9个。