Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Research Unit in Physio - and Occupational Therapy, Department of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Lillebaelt Hospital - Vejle, Vejle, Denmark.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Sep;33(9):1918-1927. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.055. Epub 2024 May 16.
The mechanistic response of rotator cuff tendons to exercises within the context of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) remains a significant gap in current research. A greater understanding of this response can shed light on why individuals exhibit varying responses to exercise interventions. It can also provide information on the influence of certain types of exercise on tendons. The primary aim of this article is to explore if changes in supraspinatus tendon thickness (SSTT) ratio differ between exercise interventions (high load vs. low load). The secondary aims are to explore if changes in SSTT ratio differ between ultrasonographic tendinopathy subgroups (reactive vs. degenerative) and if there are associations between tendinopathy subgroups, changes in tendon thickness ratio, and clinical outcomes (disability).
This study comprises secondary analyses of the combined dataset from two randomized controlled trials that compared high and low-load exercises in patients with RCRSP. In those trials, different exercise interventions were compared: 1) progressive high-load strengthening exercises and 2) low-load strengthening with or without motor control exercises. In 1 trial, there was also a third group that was not allocated to exercises (education only). Ultrasound-assessed SSTT ratio, derived from comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic sides, served as the primary measure in categorizing participants into tendinopathy subgroups (reactive, normal and degenerative) at baseline.
Data from 159 participants were analyzed. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs revealed significant Group (P < .001) and Group × Time interaction (P < .001) effects for the SSTT ratio in different tendinopathy subgroups, but no Time effect (P = .63). Following the interventions, SSTT ratio increased in the "Degenerative" subgroup (0.14 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.09-0.19]), decreased in the "Reactive" subgroup (-0.11 [95% CI: -0.16 to -0.06]), and remained unchanged in the "Normal" subgroup (-0.01 [95% CI: -0.04 to 0.02]). There was no Time (P = .21), Group (P = .61), or Group × Time interaction (P = .66) effect for the SSTT ratio based on intervention allocation. Results of the linear regression did not highlight any significant association between the tendinopathy subgroup (P = .25) or change in SSTT ratio (P = .40) and change in disability score.
Findings from this study suggest that, over time, SSTT in individuals with RCRSP tends to normalize, compared to the contralateral side, regardless of the exercise intervention. Different subgroups of symptomatic tendons behave differently, emphasizing the need to potentially consider tendinopathy subtypes in RCRSP research. Future adequately powered studies should investigate how those different tendinopathy subgroups may predict long-term clinical outcomes.
在与肩袖相关的肩痛(RCRSP)背景下,肩袖肌腱对运动的机械反应仍然是当前研究中的一个重大空白。更深入地了解这种反应可以阐明为什么个体对运动干预的反应不同。它还可以提供有关某些类型的运动对肌腱影响的信息。本文的主要目的是探讨在高负荷与低负荷运动干预之间,肩袖肌腱厚度(SSTT)比值是否存在差异。次要目的是探讨 SSTT 比值在超声肌腱病亚组(反应性与退行性)之间是否存在差异,以及肌腱病亚组、肌腱厚度比值变化与临床结局(残疾)之间是否存在相关性。
本研究是对两项比较 RCRSP 患者高负荷与低负荷运动的随机对照试验的合并数据集进行的二次分析。在这些试验中,比较了不同的运动干预措施:1)渐进式高负荷强化运动,2)低负荷强化运动加或不加运动控制。在其中一项试验中,还有第三组未接受运动治疗(仅接受教育)。超声评估的 SSTT 比值,通过比较症状侧和无症状侧得出,作为基线时将参与者分为肌腱病亚组(反应性、正常和退行性)的主要指标。
对 159 名参与者的数据进行了分析。双向重复测量方差分析显示,在不同肌腱病亚组中,组间(P<.001)和组间×时间交互作用(P<.001)对 SSTT 比值均有显著影响,但时间效应无统计学意义(P=.63)。干预后,“退行性”亚组的 SSTT 比值增加(0.14 [95%置信区间 {CI}:0.09-0.19]),“反应性”亚组减少(-0.11 [95% CI:-0.16 至 -0.06]),“正常”亚组不变(-0.01 [95% CI:-0.04 至 0.02])。基于干预分配,SSTT 比值的时间(P=.21)、组间(P=.61)或组间×时间交互作用(P=.66)均无统计学意义。线性回归结果并未显示肌腱病亚组(P=.25)或 SSTT 比值变化(P=.40)与残疾评分变化之间存在任何显著关联。
本研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,与对侧相比,RCRSP 患者的 SSTT 倾向于正常化,无论运动干预如何。症状性肌腱的不同亚组表现不同,强调在 RCRSP 研究中可能需要考虑肌腱病亚型。未来应进行足够大的、有力的研究,以探讨这些不同的肌腱病亚组如何预测长期临床结局。