Jozef Stefan Institute, Department of Automatics, Biocybernetics and Robotics, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jozef Stefan Institute, Department of Automatics, Biocybernetics and Robotics, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J Therm Biol. 2023 Feb;112:103442. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103442. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
A wide range of cooling vests for heat-strain mitigation purposes during physical work are available on the market. The decision regarding the optimal cooling vest/concept for a specific environment can be challenging by relying solely on the information provided by the manufacturers. The aim of this study was to investigate how different types of cooling vests would manifest/perform in a simulated industrial setting, in a warm and moderately humid environment with low air velocity.
Ten young males completed six experimental trials, including a control trial (no vest) and five trials with vests of different cooling concepts. Once entering the climatic chamber (ambient temperature: 35 °C, relative humidity: 50 %), participants remained seated for 30 min to induce passive heating, after which they donned a cooling vest and started a 2.5-h of walk at 4.5 km·h. During the trial, torso skin temperature (T), microclimate temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH), as well as core temperature (rectal and gastrointestinal; T) and heart rate (HR) were measured. Before and after the walk, participants conducted different cognitive tests and provided subjective ratings throughout the walk.
The use of the vests attenuated the increase in HR (103 ± 12 bpm) when compared to control trial (116 ± 17 bpm, p < 0.05). Four vests maintained a lower torso T (31.7 ± 1.5 °C) compared to control trial (36.1 ± 0.5 °C, p < 0.05). Two vests using PCM inserts attenuated the increase in T between 0.2 and 0.5 °C in relation to control trial (p < 0.05). Cognitive performance remained unchanged between the trials. Physiological responses were also well reflected in subjective reports.
Most vests could be considered as an adequate mitigation strategy for workers in industry under the conditions simulated in the present study.
市场上有各种各样的冷却背心,用于在体力劳动中减轻热应激。仅依靠制造商提供的信息,很难决定哪种冷却背心/概念最适合特定环境。本研究旨在探讨在温暖、中等湿度、低空气速度的环境中,不同类型的冷却背心在模拟工业环境中的表现。
10 名年轻男性完成了 6 项实验,包括对照试验(不穿背心)和 5 项不同冷却概念背心的试验。参与者一进入气候室(环境温度:35°C,相对湿度:50%),就会先坐 30 分钟以被动加热,然后穿上冷却背心,以 4.5 公里/小时的速度行走 2.5 小时。在试验过程中,测量躯干皮肤温度(T)、微气候温度(T)和相对湿度(RH)以及核心温度(直肠和胃肠道;T)和心率(HR)。在步行前后,参与者进行了不同的认知测试,并在整个步行过程中提供了主观评价。
与对照试验(116±17bpm)相比,使用背心可降低心率的增加(103±12bpm,p<0.05)。与对照试验(36.1±0.5°C)相比,有 4 件背心保持较低的躯干 T(31.7±1.5°C)(p<0.05)。使用 PCM 插入物的 2 件背心可使 T 的增加降低 0.2 至 0.5°C,与对照试验相比(p<0.05)。试验之间的认知表现保持不变。生理反应也很好地反映在主观报告中。
在本研究模拟的条件下,大多数背心可被视为工业工人的一种合适的缓解策略。