• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从临床专家和开发者角度看医院中移动机器人实施的障碍与促进因素

Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of mobilization robots in hospitals from the perspective of clinical experts and developers.

作者信息

Warmbein Angelika, Rathgeber Ivanka, Seif Janesca, Mehler-Klamt Amrei C, Schmidbauer Lena, Scharf Christina, Hübner Lucas, Schroeder Ines, Biebl Johanna, Gutmann Marcus, Eberl Inge, Zoller Michael, Fischer Uli

机构信息

Clinical Nursing Research and Quality Management Unit, University Hospital LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Professorship of Nursing Science, Faculty of Social Work, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2023 Feb 17;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01202-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-023-01202-2
PMID:36797701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9936640/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early mobilization can help reduce severe side effects such as muscle atrophy that occur during hospitalization. However, due to time and staff shortages in intensive and critical care as well as safety risks for patients, it is often difficult to adhere to the recommended therapy time of twenty minutes twice a day. New robotic technologies might be one approach to achieve early mobilization effectively for patients and also relieve users from physical effort. Nevertheless, currently there is a lack of knowledge regarding the factors that are important for integrating of these technologies into complex treatment settings like intensive care units or rehabilitation units.

METHODS

European experts from science, technical development and end-users of robotic systems (n = 13) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guideline to identify barriers and facilitating factors for the integration of robotic systems into daily clinical practice. They were asked about structural, personnel and environmental factors that had an impact on integration and how they had solved challenges. A latent content analysis was performed regarding the COREQ criteria.

RESULTS

We found relevant factors regarding the development, introduction, and routine of the robotic system. In this context, costs, process adjustments, a lack of exemptions, and a lack of support from the manufacturers/developers were identified as challenges. Easy handling, joint decision making between the end-users and the decision makers in the hospital, an accurate process design and the joint development of the robotic system of end-users and technical experts were found to be facilitating factors.

CONCLUSION

The integration and preparation for the integration of robotic assistance systems into the inpatient setting is a complex intervention that involves many parties. This study provides evidence for hospitals or manufacturers to simplify the planning of integrations for permanent use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS-ID: DRKS00023848; registered 10/12/2020.

摘要

背景

早期活动有助于减少住院期间出现的肌肉萎缩等严重副作用。然而,由于重症监护和危重症护理中时间和人员短缺,以及患者的安全风险,往往难以坚持每天两次、每次20分钟的推荐治疗时间。新型机器人技术可能是一种有效实现患者早期活动并减轻使用者体力负担的方法。尽管如此,目前对于将这些技术整合到重症监护病房或康复病房等复杂治疗环境中的重要因素仍缺乏了解。

方法

采用半结构化访谈指南,对来自机器人系统科学、技术开发和终端用户领域的13位欧洲专家进行访谈,以确定将机器人系统整合到日常临床实践中的障碍和促进因素。询问他们关于对整合有影响的结构、人员和环境因素,以及他们如何应对挑战。根据COREQ标准进行了潜在内容分析。

结果

我们发现了与机器人系统的开发、引入和日常使用相关的因素。在此背景下,成本、流程调整、缺乏豁免以及制造商/开发者缺乏支持被确定为挑战。易于操作、终端用户与医院决策者之间的共同决策、准确的流程设计以及终端用户与技术专家共同开发机器人系统被发现是促进因素。

结论

将机器人辅助系统整合到住院环境以及为整合做准备是一项涉及多方的复杂干预措施。本研究为医院或制造商简化永久性使用的整合规划提供了依据。

试验注册

DRKS-ID:DRKS00023848;于2020年12月10日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5d/9936640/8e7a8be28f8a/12912_2023_1202_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5d/9936640/8e7a8be28f8a/12912_2023_1202_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5d/9936640/8e7a8be28f8a/12912_2023_1202_Figa_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of mobilization robots in hospitals from the perspective of clinical experts and developers.从临床专家和开发者角度看医院中移动机器人实施的障碍与促进因素
BMC Nurs. 2023 Feb 17;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01202-2.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Robot-assisted early mobilization for intensive care unit patients: Feasibility and first-time clinical use.机器人辅助重症监护病房患者早期活动:可行性和首次临床应用。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Apr;152:104702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104702. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
4
Study protocol for the implementation and evaluation of a digital-robotic-based intervention for nurses and patients in a hospital: a quantitative and qualitative triangulation based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions.医院中针对护士和患者的基于数字机器人的干预措施实施与评估研究方案:基于医学研究理事会(MRC)开发和评估复杂干预措施框架的定量与定性三角测量法
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 9;21(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01088-6.
5
Understanding barriers and facilitators to the use of Clinical Information Systems for intensive care units and Anesthesia Record Keeping: A rapid ethnography.了解重症监护病房和麻醉记录保存中临床信息系统使用的障碍与促进因素:一项快速人种志研究
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Jul;84(7):500-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
6
Implementation of robotic devices in nursing care. Barriers and facilitators: an integrative review.护理中机器人设备的应用。障碍与促进因素:一项综合综述。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 21;10(9):e038650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038650.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
Perspectives of Policy Makers and Service Users Concerning the Implementation of eHealth in Sweden: Interview Study.政策制定者和服务使用者对瑞典电子健康实施的看法:访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 28;24(1):e28870. doi: 10.2196/28870.
9
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

引用本文的文献

1
Responsible and adaptive robots in care home settings: an implementation framework analysis of a workshop with public and professionals.养老院环境中负责且适应性强的机器人:与公众和专业人士举办的研讨会的实施框架分析
Front Robot AI. 2025 Jul 25;12:1610329. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1610329. eCollection 2025.
2
New colleague or gimmick hurdle? A user-centric scoping review of the barriers and facilitators of robots in hospitals.新同事还是噱头障碍?一项以用户为中心的关于医院机器人障碍与促进因素的范围界定综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Nov 11;3(11):e0000660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000660. eCollection 2024 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol.机器人辅助重症监护患者早期活动:一项可行性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Nov 5;8(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01191-0.
2
[Early mobilization in the intensive care unit-Are robot-assisted systems the future?].[重症监护病房中的早期活动——机器人辅助系统是未来的发展方向吗?]
Anaesthesiologie. 2022 Oct;71(10):795-800. doi: 10.1007/s00101-022-01130-x. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
3
Chances and Risks of Using Robotic Assistance Systems in Early Neurological Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Analysis.
早期神经康复中使用机器人辅助系统的机会和风险:定性分析。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 29;295:434-437. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220758.
4
Movement therapy in advanced heart failure assisted by a lightweight wearable robot: a feasibility pilot study.轻便可穿戴机器人辅助下的晚期心力衰竭运动疗法:一项可行性试点研究。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;9(3):1643-1650. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13903. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
[Mobilization of Intensive Care Unit Patients: How Can the ICU Rooms and Modern Medical Equipment Help?].[重症监护病房患者的转运:重症监护病房及现代医疗设备如何提供帮助?]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2022 Jan;57(1):41-51. doi: 10.1055/a-1324-0627. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
6
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990—2019年全球、区域和国家的卒中负担及其风险因素:全球疾病负担研究2019的系统分析
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
7
Very Early Robot-Assisted Mobilization of Intensive Care Patients - A Scoping Review.早期机器人辅助重症监护患者活动 - 范围综述。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:1073-1074. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210350.
8
Evaluation of the effects of pycnogenol (French maritime pine bark extract) supplementation on inflammatory biomarkers and nutritional and clinical status in traumatic brain injury patients in an intensive care unit: A randomized clinical trial protocol.评价碧萝芷(法国沿海松树皮提取物)补充对重症监护室创伤性脑损伤患者炎症生物标志物及营养和临床状况的影响:一项随机临床试验方案。
Trials. 2020 Feb 11;21(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4008-x.
9
Use of robot technology in passive mobilization of acute hospitalized geriatric medicine patients: a pilot test and feasibility study.机器人技术在急性住院老年医学患者被动活动中的应用:一项试点测试与可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Jan 6;6:1. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0545-z. eCollection 2020.
10
Beyond "implementation": digital health innovation and service design.超越“实施”:数字健康创新与服务设计
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Sep 20;1:48. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0059-8. eCollection 2018.