Danso Samuel O, Manu Alexander, Fenty Justin, Amanga-Etego Seeba, Avan Bilal Iqbal, Newton Sam, Soremekun Seyi, Kirkwood Betty
Disease Modelling Research Group, Centre for Dementia Prevention & Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 16;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12982-023-00120-7.
Low and middle-income countries continue to use Verbal autopsies (VAs) as a World Health Organisation-recommended method to ascertain causes of death in settings where coverage of vital registration systems is not yet comprehensive. Whilst the adoption of VA has resulted in major improvements in estimating cause-specific mortality in many settings, well documented limitations have been identified relating to the standardisation of the processes involved. The WHO has invested significant resources into addressing concerns in some of these areas; there however remains enduring challenges particularly in operationalising VA surveys for deaths amongst women and children, challenges which have measurable impacts on the quality of data collected and on the accuracy of determining the final cause of death. In this paper we describe some of our key experiences and recommendations in conducting VAs from over two decades of evaluating seminal trials of maternal and child health interventions in rural Ghana. We focus on challenges along the entire VA pathway that can impact on the success rates of ascertaining the final cause of death, and lessons we have learned to optimise the procedures. We highlight our experiences of the value of the open history narratives in VAs and the training and skills required to optimise the quality of the information collected. We describe key issues in methods for ascertaining cause of death and argue that both automated and physician-based methods can be valid depending on the setting. We further summarise how increasingly popular information technology methods may be used to facilitate the processes described. Verbal autopsy is a vital means of increasing the coverage of accurate mortality statistics in low- and middle-income settings, however operationalisation remains problematic. The lessons we share here in conducting VAs within a long-term surveillance system in Ghana will be applicable to researchers and policymakers in many similar settings.
低收入和中等收入国家继续采用口头尸检(VAs)作为世界卫生组织推荐的方法,以在生命登记系统覆盖范围尚不全面的情况下确定死因。虽然采用口头尸检在许多情况下已使特定病因死亡率的估计有了重大改进,但已发现与所涉过程标准化相关的诸多局限性。世卫组织已投入大量资源来解决其中一些领域的问题;然而,挑战依然存在,尤其是在实施针对妇女和儿童死亡的口头尸检调查方面,这些挑战对所收集数据的质量以及确定最终死因的准确性产生了可衡量的影响。在本文中,我们描述了在加纳农村对母婴健康干预重大试验进行二十多年评估过程中开展口头尸检的一些关键经验和建议。我们关注口头尸检全过程中可能影响确定最终死因成功率的挑战,以及为优化程序所吸取的教训。我们强调了口头尸检中开放病史叙述的价值,以及优化所收集信息质量所需的培训和技能。我们描述了确定死因方法中的关键问题,并认为根据具体情况,自动化方法和基于医生的方法都可能有效。我们还总结了日益流行的信息技术方法可如何用于便利所述过程。口头尸检是增加低收入和中等收入地区准确死亡率统计覆盖范围的重要手段,但实施仍存在问题。我们在此分享的在加纳长期监测系统中开展口头尸检的经验将适用于许多类似环境中的研究人员和政策制定者。