• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用两种技术评估制作开放式托盘种植体印模的准确性和所需时间。

Evaluation of accuracy and time taken to make an open tray implant impressions with two techniques.

作者信息

Teja Reddy M Sai, Ahmed Nabeel, Maiti Subhabrata, Ganapathy Dhanraj M

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Dec;13(Suppl 2):S437-S441. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_308_22. Epub 2022 Dec 30.

DOI:10.4103/japtr.japtr_308_22
PMID:36798552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9926596/
Abstract

Implant dentistry's emergence and acceptance have provided physicians with a wide range of new options for fixed and removable rehabilitation. The eventual replacement of the lost tooth is the ultimate success, and this can be accomplished using recognized prosthodontic methods. The present study aims to evaluate the time and dimensional accuracy of implant definitive models with an open tray impression with two different techniques. Impression was made in two different techniques and the cast was poured and checked for the time taken and the accuracy of the impression. In IBM SPSS software version 23.0 all the results were statistically analyzed. An Independent -test was performed for the parameters. No statistically significant difference was present ( > 0.05) when comparing the accuracy and time taken between the two groups. It is concluded that time taken and the misfit is less for modified open tray impression techniques when compared to the regular open tray impression.

摘要

种植牙科的出现与被认可为医生提供了广泛的固定和可摘修复新选择。最终替换缺失牙是最终的成功，这可以通过公认的修复方法来实现。本研究旨在评估采用两种不同技术的开放托盘印模制作种植体最终模型的时间和尺寸精度。采用两种不同技术制取印模，灌注模型并检查所需时间和印模精度。在IBM SPSS 23.0软件中对所有结果进行统计学分析。对各项参数进行独立t检验。比较两组之间的精度和所需时间时，未发现统计学显著差异（P>0.05）。得出的结论是，与常规开放托盘印模相比，改良开放托盘印模技术所需时间和不贴合度更小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/aed89c2e98f1/JAPTR-13-437-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/138c20ec58e5/JAPTR-13-437-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/fb07013952f2/JAPTR-13-437-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/5c0dd9b34fd4/JAPTR-13-437-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/e78f7761d44f/JAPTR-13-437-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/9d1bde4caece/JAPTR-13-437-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/3949d0d0f815/JAPTR-13-437-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/340f1d55d9f4/JAPTR-13-437-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/446c953eea68/JAPTR-13-437-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/aed89c2e98f1/JAPTR-13-437-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/138c20ec58e5/JAPTR-13-437-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/fb07013952f2/JAPTR-13-437-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/5c0dd9b34fd4/JAPTR-13-437-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/e78f7761d44f/JAPTR-13-437-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/9d1bde4caece/JAPTR-13-437-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/3949d0d0f815/JAPTR-13-437-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/340f1d55d9f4/JAPTR-13-437-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/446c953eea68/JAPTR-13-437-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eadc/9926596/aed89c2e98f1/JAPTR-13-437-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of accuracy and time taken to make an open tray implant impressions with two techniques.用两种技术评估制作开放式托盘种植体印模的准确性和所需时间。
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Dec;13(Suppl 2):S437-S441. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_308_22. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
2
Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An Study.三种不同印模技术在种植体印模中的三维精度比较：一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):172-178.
3
Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.评估不同印模技术和夹板固定方法对多个种植体印模尺寸精度的影响：一项体外研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Aug 1;19(8):1005-1012.
4
Implant impression accuracy of parallel and non-parallel implants: a comparative in-vitro analysis of open and closed tray techniques.平行与非平行种植体的印模准确性：开放托盘技术与封闭托盘技术的体外对比分析
Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Feb 19;5(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0159-5.
5
Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.两种带角度种植体印模技术的准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jun;97(6):349-56. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60023-7.
6
Accuracy of Different Implant Impression Techniques: Evaluation of New Tray Design Concept.不同种植体取模技术的准确性：新型托盘设计理念的评估。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e682-e687. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12733. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
7
Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure.多单位种植体印模的准确性：传统技术与数字化流程的比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1253-1262. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2217-9. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
8
Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.游离端鞍式局部牙列缺损患者种植印模技术准确性的数字化评估。一项对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Nov 12;22(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02505-7.
9
An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.种植体印模的准确性比较：编码愈合基台和不同种植体角度的体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Aug;110(2):90-100. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60346-7.
10
Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital Impressions-An In Vitro Study.常规和数字化印模制取种植体印模的精度：一项体外研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 27;15(8):1599. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081599.

引用本文的文献

1
The Technique and Material Used to Join Transfers Affect the Accuracy and Final Fit of Implant-Supported Prostheses-In Vitro Study.用于连接转移体的技术和材料会影响种植体支持修复体的准确性和最终贴合度——体外研究
Eur J Dent. 2024 Oct;18(4):1040-1047. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1779422. Epub 2024 May 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative analysis of pink and white esthetics of anterior full veneer crown: Indian scenario.前牙全瓷贴面冠粉色与白色美学的对比分析：印度情况
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Nov;13(Suppl 1):S282-S287. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_214_22. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
2
Evaluation of Microbial Leakage at Implant Abutment Interfact for Different Implant Systems: An In Vitro Study.不同种植体系统中种植体-基台界面微生物渗漏的评估：一项体外研究。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2022;32(2):87-93. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022038657.
3
Polyether ether ketone - As an alternative biomaterial for Metal Richmond crown-3-dimensional finite element analysis.
聚醚醚酮——作为金属里士满冠的替代生物材料——三维有限元分析
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;24(6):553-557. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_638_20. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
Three-dimensional-Printed Malo Bridge: Digital Fixed Prosthesis for the Partially Edentulous Maxilla.三维打印马洛桥：用于上颌部分牙列缺失的数字固定修复体
Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Oct-Dec;12(4):451-453. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_456_20. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
5
Data on dental bite materials with stability and displacement under load.关于在负载下具有稳定性和位移的牙科咬合材料的数据。
Bioinformation. 2020 Dec 31;16(12):1145-1151. doi: 10.6026/973206300161145. eCollection 2020.
6
Correlation of soft tissue biotype with pink aesthetic score in single full veneer crown.单颗全瓷贴面修复中软组织生物型与粉色美学评分的相关性
Bioinformation. 2020 Dec 31;16(12):1139-1144. doi: 10.6026/973206300161139. eCollection 2020.
7
Comparative analysis of different impression techniques in relation to single tooth impression.与单颗牙齿印模相关的不同印模技术的比较分析
Bioinformation. 2020 Dec 31;16(12):1105-1110. doi: 10.6026/973206300161105. eCollection 2020.
8
Effect of Submandibular Fossa on Implant Length in the Posterior Mandibular Region.下颌下窝对下颌后牙区种植体长轴的影响
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2020;30(3):219-226. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2020035970.
9
Open- or Closed-Tray Impression Technique in Implant Prosthesis: A Dentist's Perspective.种植体修复中的开口托盘或闭口托盘印模技术：牙医的视角。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2020;30(3):193-198. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2020035933.
10
Aesthetic Outcome of Implants in the Anterior Zone after Socket Preservation and Conventional Implant Placement: A Retrospective Study.种植体在前牙区保存牙槽窝同期植入与常规植入的美学效果比较：一项回顾性研究。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2020;30(4):233-239. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2020035942.