Teja Reddy M Sai, Ahmed Nabeel, Maiti Subhabrata, Ganapathy Dhanraj M
Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Dec;13(Suppl 2):S437-S441. doi: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_308_22. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
Implant dentistry's emergence and acceptance have provided physicians with a wide range of new options for fixed and removable rehabilitation. The eventual replacement of the lost tooth is the ultimate success, and this can be accomplished using recognized prosthodontic methods. The present study aims to evaluate the time and dimensional accuracy of implant definitive models with an open tray impression with two different techniques. Impression was made in two different techniques and the cast was poured and checked for the time taken and the accuracy of the impression. In IBM SPSS software version 23.0 all the results were statistically analyzed. An Independent -test was performed for the parameters. No statistically significant difference was present ( > 0.05) when comparing the accuracy and time taken between the two groups. It is concluded that time taken and the misfit is less for modified open tray impression techniques when compared to the regular open tray impression.
种植牙科的出现与被认可为医生提供了广泛的固定和可摘修复新选择。最终替换缺失牙是最终的成功,这可以通过公认的修复方法来实现。本研究旨在评估采用两种不同技术的开放托盘印模制作种植体最终模型的时间和尺寸精度。采用两种不同技术制取印模,灌注模型并检查所需时间和印模精度。在IBM SPSS 23.0软件中对所有结果进行统计学分析。对各项参数进行独立t检验。比较两组之间的精度和所需时间时,未发现统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。得出的结论是,与常规开放托盘印模相比,改良开放托盘印模技术所需时间和不贴合度更小。