Boric-Persson Fredrik, Turkiewicz Aleksandra, Neuman Paul, Englund Martin
Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Malmoe, Sweden.
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2023 Jan 20;5(1):100340. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100340. eCollection 2023 Mar.
To evaluate sick leave after meniscal repair vs arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) and, for comparison, vs the general population.
Using Swedish register data we included all employed persons aged 19-49 years in the general population of Skåne region and identified those having had meniscus repair or APM in the period of 2005-2012. We retrieved data on sick leave during 1 year before until 2 years after surgery. We used logistic regression to estimate the risk differences of being on sick leave and negative binomial model to analyze differences in the number of days on sick leave.
We included 192 persons with meniscus repair, 2481 with APM, and 376 345 references without meniscus surgery. Of these, 55% of meniscus repair group, 43% of APM group had any sick leave in the 2-year period following the surgery, while 17% of the references were on sick leave in the corresponding period. The mean (SD) number of days of sick leave after meniscus repair was 55 (77) days and for APM 37 (86) days. Meniscus repair was associated with higher probability of sick leave compared to APM with an adjusted risk difference of 0.13 (95% CI 0.07-0.19).
Persons undergoing meniscus repair have more frequent and 37% longer periods of sick leave in the short term than persons undergoing APM. However, sick leave in the long-term warrant further attention as successful repair may be associated with less knee osteoarthritis development than APM.
评估半月板修复术后与关节镜下部分半月板切除术(APM)后的病假情况,并与普通人群进行比较。
利用瑞典登记数据,我们纳入了斯科讷地区普通人群中所有年龄在19 - 49岁的就业人员,并确定了那些在2005 - 2012年期间接受过半月板修复或APM的人员。我们检索了手术前1年至手术后2年的病假数据。我们使用逻辑回归来估计病假风险差异,并使用负二项式模型来分析病假天数的差异。
我们纳入了192例半月板修复患者、2481例接受APM的患者以及376345例未进行半月板手术的对照人员。其中,半月板修复组的55%、APM组的43%在手术后2年期间有任何病假,而对照组在相应期间有17%的人病假。半月板修复术后病假的平均(标准差)天数为55(77)天,APM术后为37(86)天。与APM相比,半月板修复与病假概率较高相关,调整后的风险差异为0.13(95%置信区间0.07 - 0.19)。
与接受APM的人相比,接受半月板修复的人在短期内病假更频繁,病假时间长37%。然而,长期病假情况值得进一步关注,因为成功的修复可能比APM与较少的膝关节骨关节炎发展相关。