• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前交叉韧带重建中半月板修复与部分切除术的成本效益比较。

The Cost-Effectiveness of Meniscal Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy in the Setting of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

机构信息

Sports Medicine Center, OrthoCarolina, Charlotte, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, U.S.A..

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2614-2620. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.046.

DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.046
PMID:30173802
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the cost-effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with meniscal repair to ACL reconstruction with partial meniscectomy.

METHODS

A decision-analytic Markov disease progression model with a 40-year horizon was created simulating outcomes after both meniscal repair and partial meniscectomy at the time of ACL reconstruction. Event probabilities, costs, and utilities were used for the index procedures. The development of osteoarthritis and subsequent knee replacement were either calculated or selected from published literature. Difference in cost, difference in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effective ratio were calculated to determine which index procedure is most cost-effective.

RESULTS

There is total direct cost from ACL reconstruction with meniscus repair of $17,898 compared with that with partial meniscectomy of $24,768 (cost savings of $6,870). There was an estimated gain of 18.00 QALYs after ACL reconstruction with meniscus repair compared with 17.16 QALYs with partial meniscectomy (increase of 0.84 QALYs). In this scenario, meniscus repair is the dominant index procedure at the time of ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Meniscal repair at the time of ACL reconstruction is more cost-effective than partial meniscectomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, economic and decision analysis.

摘要

目的

比较前交叉韧带(ACL)重建伴半月板修复与 ACL 重建伴半月板部分切除术的成本效益。

方法

创建了一个具有 40 年时间范围的决策分析马尔可夫疾病进展模型,模拟了 ACL 重建时半月板修复和半月板部分切除后的结果。指数手术采用事件概率、成本和效用。骨关节炎的发展和随后的膝关节置换术要么是通过计算得出的,要么是从已发表的文献中选择的。计算了成本差异、质量调整生命年(QALY)差异和增量成本效益比,以确定哪种指数手术最具成本效益。

结果

ACL 重建伴半月板修复的总直接成本为 17898 美元,而 ACL 重建伴半月板部分切除术为 24768 美元(节省成本 6870 美元)。ACL 重建伴半月板修复后估计获得的 QALY 为 18.00,而 ACL 重建伴半月板部分切除术为 17.16(增加 0.84 QALY)。在此情况下,ACL 重建时半月板修复是更具成本效益的指数手术。

结论

ACL 重建时半月板修复比半月板部分切除术更具成本效益。

证据水平

IV 级,经济和决策分析。

相似文献

1
The Cost-Effectiveness of Meniscal Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy in the Setting of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建中半月板修复与部分切除术的成本效益比较。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2614-2620. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.046.
2
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Isolated Meniscal Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy for Red-Red Zone, Vertical Meniscal Tears in the Young Adult.青年红-红区垂直型半月板撕裂行半月板修复术与半月板部分切除术的成本效果分析
Arthroscopy. 2019 Dec;35(12):3280-3286. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.06.026.
3
The cost-effectiveness of meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy: A model-based projection for the United States.半月板修复与部分半月板切除术的成本效益:美国基于模型的预测。
Knee. 2016 Aug;23(4):674-80. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 May 3.
4
Seventeen-Year Follow-up After Meniscal Repair With Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Pediatric and Adolescent Population.儿童和青少年前交叉韧带重建伴半月板修复后 17 年随访。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3361-3367. doi: 10.1177/0363546518803934. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
Meniscus Root Repair vs Meniscectomy or Nonoperative Management to Prevent Knee Osteoarthritis After Medial Meniscus Root Tears: Clinical and Economic Effectiveness.半月板根修复与半月板切除术或非手术治疗预防内侧半月板根撕裂后膝关节骨关节炎的临床和经济效果。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):762-769. doi: 10.1177/0363546518755754. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
The role of meniscal tears and meniscectomy in the mechanical stability of the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee.半月板撕裂和半月板切除术在前交叉韧带损伤膝关节机械稳定性中的作用。
Knee. 2018 Dec;25(6):1051-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
7
Trends in the surgical treatment of meniscal tears in patients with and without concurrent anterior cruciate ligament tears.半月板撕裂患者合并与不合并前交叉韧带撕裂的手术治疗趋势。
Phys Sportsmed. 2020 May;48(2):229-235. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2019.1685363. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
8
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Early Reconstruction Versus Rehabilitation and Delayed Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.前交叉韧带撕裂早期重建与康复及延迟重建的成本效益分析
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1583-91. doi: 10.1177/0363546514530866. Epub 2014 May 6.
9
Outcomes After Biologically Augmented Isolated Meniscal Repair With Marrow Venting Are Comparable With Those After Meniscal Repair With Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.采用骨髓减压进行生物增强的单纯半月板修复后的结果与同时进行前交叉韧带重建的半月板修复后的结果相当。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 May;45(6):1341-1348. doi: 10.1177/0363546516686968. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
The Cost-Effectiveness of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Competitive Athletes.竞技运动员前交叉韧带重建的成本效益
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):23-33. doi: 10.1177/0363546516664719. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative evaluation of postoperative status after meniscal repair using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging.使用合成磁共振成像对半月板修复术后状态进行定量评估。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jun 24;30(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02763-5.
2
Does concomitant meniscus repair and meniscectomy show different efficacy in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在膝关节前交叉韧带重建术中,同时进行半月板修复和半月板切除术的疗效是否不同?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
J Orthop Translat. 2024 Jul 25;48:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.07.004. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Cost-utility analysis of early reconstruction surgery versus conservative treatment for anterior cruciate ligament injury in a lower-middle income country.
中低收入国家前交叉韧带损伤的早期重建手术与保守治疗的成本-效用分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11212-8.
4
An All-Suture-Based Technique for Meniscal Repair Is Cost-Effective in Comparison to Partial Meniscectomy for Horizontal Cleavage Tears.与部分半月板切除术治疗水平劈裂损伤相比,一种全缝线半月板修复技术具有成本效益。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 13;6(2):100847. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100847. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
The Proportion of Meniscus Tears Considered Repairable, and Thus Repaired, Increased During a Single Surgeon's Practice of 20 Years.在一位外科医生20年的执业生涯中,被认为可修复并因此得以修复的半月板撕裂比例有所增加。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Jul 31;5(5):100778. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100778. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
In-office needle arthroscopy is a cost-effective alternative for operating room diversion in medial meniscectomy: a financial analysis.门诊关节镜检查是内侧半月板切除术中转手术室的一种具有成本效益的替代方法:财务分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 15;18(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03866-7.
7
Meniscus Work and Implant Selection Are Major Cost Drivers of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.半月板手术及植入物选择是前交叉韧带重建的主要成本驱动因素。
Cureus. 2023 Feb 5;15(2):e34647. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34647. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Sick leave after arthroscopic meniscus repair vs. arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.关节镜下半月板修复与关节镜下部分半月板切除术后的病假情况
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2023 Jan 20;5(1):100340. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100340. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Health-economic evaluation of meniscus tear treatments: a systematic review.半月板撕裂治疗的健康经济学评价:系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Sep;31(9):3582-3593. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07278-8. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
10
Cost and Cost Driver Analysis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing: Bone-Tendon-Bone Autograft Versus Hamstring Autograft.基于时间驱动作业成本法的前交叉韧带重建成本及成本动因分析:骨-肌腱-骨自体移植物与腘绳肌自体移植物对比
JB JS Open Access. 2022 Oct 11;7(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00069. eCollection 2022 Oct-Dec.