• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹结肠癌根治术治疗 T4 和/或 N2 期结肠癌患者的中期疗效比较:基于倾向评分匹配分析的多中心研究

Mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open colectomy for pathological T4 and/or N2 colon cancer patients: Multicenter study using propensity score matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.

Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan.

出版信息

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2023 Jul;16(3):400-408. doi: 10.1111/ases.13171. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1111/ases.13171
PMID:36799190
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess mid-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery (LAP) vs open surgery (OP) for pathological T4 (pT4) and/or N2 (pN2) colon cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 255 primary tumor resections for pT4 and/or pN2 colon cancer performed from 2015 to 2020 at six hospitals, divided into LAP (n = 204) and OP groups (n = 51). After propensity score matching to minimize selection bias, 47 matched patients per group were assessed.

RESULTS

Before matching, the rate of males (53.9% vs. 37.3%, P = .042), left sided colon cancer (53.9% vs 37.3%, P = .042), D3 lymph node dissection (90.7% vs 68.6%, P < .001) and body mass index (kg/m ) (22.3 vs 21.8, P = .039) were significantly greater in the LAP group. The rate of pT4b (7.8% vs 40.4%, P < .001) was lower and pN2 was higher (57.4% vs 37.3%, P = .012) in the LAP group. After matching, preoperative characteristics and pathologic status were equivalent between the groups. The LAP and OP groups showed comparable overall survival (OS) (2-year OS, 84.5% vs 76.8%, P = .055) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (2-year RFS, 73.9% vs 52.8%, P = .359). In the patients with pT4, OS (2-year OS, 79.4% vs 75.7%, P = .359) and RFS (2-year RFS, 71.3% vs 58.7%) were comparable. In the patients with pN2, OS (2-year OS, 83.4% vs 76.3%) and RFS (2-year RFS, 69.6% vs 36.2%) were also comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

LAP for pT4 and/or pN2 colon cancer showed comparable mid-term outcomes compared with OP. LAP was an acceptable surgical approach in this cohort.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估腹腔镜手术(LAP)与开腹手术(OP)治疗病理性 T4(pT4)和/或 N2(pN2)结肠癌的中期结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2015 年至 2020 年在六家医院进行的 255 例原发性肿瘤切除治疗 pT4 和/或 pN2 结肠癌患者,分为 LAP(n=204)和 OP 组(n=51)。为了最小化选择偏倚,对每组进行了倾向评分匹配,每组匹配了 47 例患者。

结果

在匹配之前,LAP 组的男性比例(53.9%比 37.3%,P=0.042)、左半结肠癌(53.9%比 37.3%,P=0.042)、D3 淋巴结清扫(90.7%比 68.6%,P < 0.001)和体质指数(kg/m)(22.3 比 21.8,P=0.039)明显更高。LAP 组 pT4b 的比例(7.8%比 40.4%,P < 0.001)较低,而 pN2 的比例较高(57.4%比 37.3%,P=0.012)。匹配后,两组的术前特征和病理状况相当。LAP 组和 OP 组的总生存(OS)(2 年 OS,84.5%比 76.8%,P=0.055)和无复发生存(RFS)(2 年 RFS,73.9%比 52.8%,P=0.359)相当。在 pT4 患者中,OS(2 年 OS,79.4%比 75.7%,P=0.359)和 RFS(2 年 RFS,71.3%比 58.7%)相当。在 pN2 患者中,OS(2 年 OS,83.4%比 76.3%)和 RFS(2 年 RFS,69.6%比 36.2%)也相当。

结论

LAP 治疗 pT4 和/或 pN2 结肠癌的中期结果与 OP 相当。在这一组中,LAP 是一种可以接受的手术方法。

相似文献

1
Mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open colectomy for pathological T4 and/or N2 colon cancer patients: Multicenter study using propensity score matched analysis.腹腔镜与开腹结肠癌根治术治疗 T4 和/或 N2 期结肠癌患者的中期疗效比较:基于倾向评分匹配分析的多中心研究
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2023 Jul;16(3):400-408. doi: 10.1111/ases.13171. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic approach for left-sided colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study.机器人与腹腔镜治疗左侧结肠癌的比较:一项全国性队列研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Dec;25(12):2366-2377. doi: 10.1111/codi.16803. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
3
Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in pT4 colon cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗 pT4 期结肠癌的肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:221-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.032. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
4
Oncologic Outcomes Following Laparoscopic versus Open Resection of pT4 Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术切除pT4期结肠癌后的肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jan;60(1):116-125. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000641.
5
Should we adopt a "laparoscopy first" strategy? A comparison of 30-day outcomes between converted open from laparoscopic and planned open colectomy for volvulus.我们应该采用“先腹腔镜手术”策略吗?腹腔镜手术中转开腹与计划性开腹结肠切除术治疗肠扭转的30天结局比较。
Updates Surg. 2025 Jun;77(3):749-757. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02133-0. Epub 2025 Mar 2.
6
Laparoscopic surgery for T4 colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术治疗 T4 期结肠癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):4902-4912. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5544-7. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
7
The Value of Infrapyloric Lymph Nodes Dissection in Right Hemicolectomy for Hepatic Flexure Colon Cancer: A Multicenter Analysis Based on Propensity Score Matching.幽门下淋巴结清扫在肝曲结肠癌右半结肠切除术中的价值:基于倾向评分匹配的多中心分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Mar 1;68(3):338-350. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003356. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
8
Laparoscopic Radical Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision Offers Similar Results Compared with Open Surgery.与开放手术相比,腹腔镜根治性结肠切除术联合完整结肠系膜切除术的效果相似。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 7;61(7):1231. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071231.
9
Survival Outcomes in Nonmetastatic pT4 Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A SEER Database Analysis Comparing Neoadjuvant Therapy and Upfront Surgery with Propensity Score Matching.非转移性pT4胰腺导管腺癌的生存结局:一项利用倾向评分匹配比较新辅助治疗和直接手术的监测、流行病学与结果(SEER)数据库分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 Mar 1;26(3):847-859. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.3.847.
10
Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for pathological T4 colon cancer.腹腔镜手术治疗病理 T4 期结肠癌的疗效。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jul;34(7):1259-1265. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03320-3. Epub 2019 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective observational non-randomized trial protocol for surgical planner 3D image processing & reconstruction for locally advanced colon cancer.前瞻性观察性非随机试验方案,用于局部晚期结肠癌的外科规划师 3D 图像处理和重建。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02558-1.