Caivano D, Rishniw M, Colangeli G, Birettoni F, Nisini N, Porciello F
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, Perugia 06126, Italy.
Veterinary Information Network, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Vet J. 2023 Mar;293:105966. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.105966. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
Left atrial (LA) volumes using a monoplane Simpson's Method of Discs (SMOD) can be obtained from the right parasternal long axis four-chamber (RPLA) or from the left apical four-chamber (LA4C) views in dogs; however, little information exists regarding the agreement of LA volume estimates using a SMOD on images obtained from LA4C and RPLA views. Therefore, we sought to examine the agreement between the two methods of obtaining LA volumes in a heterogenous population of healthy and diseased dogs. Additionally, we compared the LA volumes obtained by SMOD with estimates obtained from simple cube or sphere volume formulae. Archived echocardiographic examinations were retrieved and, where both RPLA and LA4C views were adequately recorded, included in the study. We obtained measurements from 194 dogs that were either apparently healthy (n = 80) or had various cardiac diseases (n = 114). The LA volumes of each dog was measured using a SMOD, from both views, in systole and diastole. Estimates of LA volumes obtained from simple cube or sphere volume formulae from RPLA-derived LA diameters were also calculated. We then used Limits of Agreement analysis to determine agreement between the estimates obtained with each view, and those calculated from linear dimensions. The two methods obtained by SMOD provided similar estimates for both systolic and diastolic volumes but did not agree sufficiently to be interchangeable. The LA4C view often slightly underestimated the LA volumes at small LA sizes and overestimated the LA volumes at large LA sizes compared to RPLA method, with increasing disagreement as the LA size increased. Estimates based on cube method overestimated volumes compared to both SMOD methods, whereas those based on sphere method performed reasonably. Our study suggests that monoplane volume estimates from the RPLA and LA4C views are similar but not interchangeable. Clinicians can also perform a rough estimate of LA volumes using RPLA-derived LA diameters to calculate the sphere volume.
使用单平面辛普森圆盘法(SMOD)测量犬类左心房(LA)容积时,可以从右胸骨旁长轴四腔心(RPLA)视图或左心尖四腔心(LA4C)视图获取;然而,关于使用SMOD在LA4C和RPLA视图图像上估计LA容积的一致性信息很少。因此,我们试图研究在健康和患病犬类的异质群体中,两种获取LA容积方法之间的一致性。此外,我们将SMOD获得的LA容积与通过简单立方体或球体体积公式获得的估计值进行了比较。检索了存档的超声心动图检查资料,在同时充分记录了RPLA和LA4C视图的情况下,将其纳入研究。我们从194只犬类获取了测量数据,这些犬类要么明显健康(n = 80),要么患有各种心脏疾病(n = 114)。在收缩期和舒张期,从两个视图使用SMOD测量每只犬的LA容积。还计算了根据RPLA衍生的LA直径通过简单立方体或球体体积公式获得的LA容积估计值。然后,我们使用一致性界限分析来确定每个视图获得的估计值与根据线性尺寸计算的估计值之间的一致性。SMOD获得的两种方法对收缩期和舒张期容积的估计相似,但一致性不足以相互替换。与RPLA方法相比,LA4C视图在LA尺寸较小时往往略微低估LA容积,而在LA尺寸较大时高估LA容积,并且随着LA尺寸增加分歧增大。与两种SMOD方法相比,基于立方体方法的估计值高估了容积,而基于球体方法的估计值表现合理。我们的研究表明,从RPLA和LA4C视图进行的单平面容积估计相似但不可相互替换。临床医生也可以使用RPLA衍生的LA直径对LA容积进行粗略估计,以计算球体体积。