• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观察性分析:医疗补助中一种广泛的、以健康计划为主导的社区卫生工作者干预措施。

Observational Analysis of a Generalized, Health Plan-led Community Health Worker Intervention in Medicaid.

机构信息

Elevance Health Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Trilliant Health, Brentwood, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231153602. doi: 10.1177/21501319231153602.

DOI:10.1177/21501319231153602
PMID:36803201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9940165/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: In 2018, a Medicaid managed care plan launched a new community health worker (CHW) initiative in several counties within a state, designed to improve the health and quality of life of members who could benefit from additional services. The CHW program involved telephonic and face-to-face visits from CHWs who provided support, empowerment, and education to members, while identifying and addressing health and social issues. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a generalized (not disease-specific), health plan-led CHW program on overall healthcare use and spending.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from adult members who received the CHW intervention (N = 538 participants) compared to those who were identified for participation but were unable to be reached (N = 435 nonparticipants). Outcomes measures included healthcare utilization, including scheduled and emergency inpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient visits; and healthcare spending. The follow-up period for all outcome measures was 6 months. Using generalized linear models, 6-month change scores were regressed on baseline characteristics to adjust for between-group differences (eg, age, sex, comorbidities) and an indicator for group.

RESULTS

Program participants experienced a greater increase in outpatient evaluation and management visits (0.09 per member per month [PMPM]) than the comparison group during the first 6 months of the program. This greater increase was observed across in-person (0.07 PMPM), telehealth (0.03 PMPM), and primary care (0.06 PMPM) visits. There was no observed difference in inpatient admissions, ED utilization or allowed medical spending and pharmacy spending.

CONCLUSIONS

A health plan-led CHW program successfully increased multiple forms of outpatient utilization in a historically disadvantaged population of patients. Health plans may be particularly well positioned to finance, sustain, and scale programs that address social drivers of health.

摘要

简介/目的:2018 年,一家医疗补助管理式医疗计划在一个州的几个县推出了一项新的社区卫生工作者(CHW)计划,旨在改善那些可以从额外服务中受益的成员的健康和生活质量。CHW 计划涉及 CHW 的电话和面对面访问,他们为成员提供支持、赋权和教育,同时识别和解决健康和社会问题。本研究的主要目的是评估一项普遍(非特定疾病)、以健康计划为主导的 CHW 计划对整体医疗保健使用和支出的影响。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究使用了接受 CHW 干预(N=538 名参与者)的成年成员的数据,并与那些确定参与但无法联系到的成员(N=435 名非参与者)进行了比较。结果测量包括医疗保健利用,包括计划内和紧急住院、急诊就诊和门诊就诊;以及医疗保健支出。所有结果测量的随访期为 6 个月。使用广义线性模型,将 6 个月的变化得分回归到基线特征上,以调整组间差异(例如年龄、性别、合并症)和组的指标。

结果

在计划的前 6 个月,与对照组相比,项目参与者的门诊评估和管理就诊次数增加了更多(每月每名成员 0.09 次[PMPM])。这种增加在面对面(0.07 PMPM)、远程医疗(0.03 PMPM)和初级保健(0.06 PMPM)就诊中均有观察到。住院人数、急诊就诊利用率或允许的医疗支出和药房支出没有观察到差异。

结论

一项以健康计划为主导的 CHW 计划成功增加了历史上处于不利地位的患者群体的多种形式的门诊利用。健康计划可能特别适合为解决健康的社会驱动因素的项目提供资金、维持和扩大规模。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f733/9940165/681b4e0c5fae/10.1177_21501319231153602-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f733/9940165/938830587fdb/10.1177_21501319231153602-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f733/9940165/681b4e0c5fae/10.1177_21501319231153602-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f733/9940165/938830587fdb/10.1177_21501319231153602-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f733/9940165/681b4e0c5fae/10.1177_21501319231153602-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Observational Analysis of a Generalized, Health Plan-led Community Health Worker Intervention in Medicaid.观察性分析:医疗补助中一种广泛的、以健康计划为主导的社区卫生工作者干预措施。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231153602. doi: 10.1177/21501319231153602.
2
Economic and utilization outcomes of medication management at a large Medicaid plan with disease management pharmacists using a novel artificial intelligence platform from 2018 to 2019: a retrospective observational study using regression methods.2018 年至 2019 年,使用新型人工智能平台的疾病管理药师对大型医疗补助计划进行药物管理的经济和利用结果:使用回归方法的回顾性观察研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Sep;27(9):1186-1196. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21036. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Study protocol for a Community Health Worker (CHW)-led comprehensive neighborhood-focused program for medicaid enrollees in detroit.底特律针对医疗补助计划参保者的、由社区卫生工作者主导的、以社区邻里为重点的综合项目研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Sep 30;16:100456. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100456. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Community health workers and medicaid managed care in New Mexico.新墨西哥州的社区卫生工作者和医疗补助管理式医疗
J Community Health. 2012 Jun;37(3):563-71. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9484-1.
5
Association of Medicaid-Focused or Commercial Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type With Outpatient and Acute Care.医疗补助重点计划或商业医疗补助管理式医疗计划类型与门诊和急性护理的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1672-1679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5408.
6
7
Association of care management intensity with healthcare utilization in an all-condition care management program.全病症护理管理项目中护理管理强度与医疗服务利用的关联
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Dec 1;25(12):e395-e402.
8
Health care utilization by children with chronic illnesses: a comparison of medicaid and employer-insured managed care.慢性病患儿的医疗保健利用情况:医疗补助与雇主投保管理式医疗的比较
Pediatrics. 1998 Oct;102(4):E44. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.4.e44.
9
Changes in blood pressure among users of lay health worker or volunteer operated community-based blood pressure programs over time: a systematic review protocol.随着时间推移,由非专业卫生工作者或志愿者运营的社区血压项目使用者的血压变化:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):30-40. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1927.
10
Opportunities for Community Health Worker Training to Improve Access to Health Care for Medicaid Enrollees.社区卫生工作者培训机会,以改善医疗补助计划参保者获得医疗保健的机会。
Popul Health Manag. 2020 Feb;23(1):38-46. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0117. Epub 2019 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in the use of telehealth at the onset of the COVID-19 public health emergency.在 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急事件开始时,远程医疗的使用存在差异。
J Telemed Telecare. 2023 Jan;29(1):3-9. doi: 10.1177/1357633X20963893. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Effects of a standardized community health worker intervention on hospitalization among disadvantaged patients with multiple chronic conditions: A pooled analysis of three clinical trials.标准化社区卫生工作者干预对多重慢性病弱势患者住院的影响:三项临床试验的汇总分析。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):894-901. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13321. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
3
Telehealth in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for rural health disparities.
远程医疗应对 COVID-19 大流行:对农村健康差距的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1816-1818. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa156.
4
Perinatal Health Outcomes Following a Community Health Worker-Supported Home-Visiting Program in Rochester, New York, 2015-2018.2015-2018 年,纽约罗切斯特市社区卫生工作者支持的家访计划对围产期健康结局的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jul;110(7):1031-1033. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305655. Epub 2020 May 21.
5
Evidence-Based Community Health Worker Program Addresses Unmet Social Needs And Generates Positive Return On Investment.基于证据的社区卫生工作者项目满足未得到满足的社会需求并产生积极的投资回报。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Feb;39(2):207-213. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00981.
6
A nudge towards increased experimentation to more rapidly improve healthcare.推动增加实验,以更快地改善医疗保健。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Mar;29(3):179-181. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009948. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
7
A Systematic Review of Interventions on Patients' Social and Economic Needs.干预患者社会和经济需求的系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Nov;53(5):719-729. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Accountable Health Communities--Addressing Social Needs through Medicare and Medicaid.责任医疗社区——通过医疗保险和医疗补助解决社会需求
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):8-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1512532. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
9
The Community Diabetes Education (CoDE) program: cost-effectiveness and health outcomes.社区糖尿病教育(CoDE)项目:成本效益与健康结果
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):771-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
10
The impact of primary care: a focused review.初级保健的影响:一项重点综述。
Scientifica (Cairo). 2012;2012:432892. doi: 10.6064/2012/432892. Epub 2012 Dec 31.