• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Medicaid-Focused or Commercial Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type With Outpatient and Acute Care.医疗补助重点计划或商业医疗补助管理式医疗计划类型与门诊和急性护理的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1672-1679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5408.
2
Association of State Access Standards With Accessibility to Specialists for Medicaid Managed Care Enrollees.州准入标准与医疗补助管理式医疗参保者获得专科医生服务的可及性之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Oct 1;177(10):1445-1451. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.3766.
3
Evaluation of Medicaid managed care. Satisfaction, access, and use.医疗补助管理式医疗评估。满意度、可及性与使用情况。
JAMA. 1996 Jul 3;276(1):50-5.
4
The Impact of Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type on Continuous Medicaid Enrollment: A Natural Experiment.医疗补助管理式医疗计划类型对连续医疗补助参保的影响:一项自然实验。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3770-3789. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13000. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
5
Medicaid Managed Care and Pediatric Dental Emergency Department Visits.医疗补助管理式医疗和儿科牙科急诊就诊。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241472. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1472.
6
Association Between Health Plan Exit From Medicaid Managed Care and Quality of Care, 2006-2014.2006 - 2014年医疗补助管理式医疗中退出医保计划与医疗质量之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2524-2531. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7118.
7
Impact of a Medicaid primary care provider and preventive care on pediatric hospitalization.医疗补助初级保健提供者及预防保健对儿科住院治疗的影响。
Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3):E1. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.3.e1.
8
Health care utilization by children with chronic illnesses: a comparison of medicaid and employer-insured managed care.慢性病患儿的医疗保健利用情况:医疗补助与雇主投保管理式医疗的比较
Pediatrics. 1998 Oct;102(4):E44. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.4.e44.
9
Do quality improvement strategies for Medicaid enrollees differ in Medicaid-dominant versus commercial managed care organizations?针对医疗补助计划参保者的质量改进策略在以医疗补助为主的组织与商业管理式医疗组织中有差异吗?
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Dec;9(12):806-16.
10
Quality of care for children in commercial and Medicaid managed care.商业保险和医疗补助管理式医疗中儿童的医疗服务质量。
JAMA. 2003 Sep 17;290(11):1486-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.11.1486.

引用本文的文献

1
Alcohol Use Disorder Medication Coverage and Utilization Management in Medicaid Managed Care Plans.医疗补助管理式医疗计划中酒精使用障碍药物的覆盖范围及使用管理
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250695. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0695.
2
Relationship between social determinants of health and hospitalizations and costs among patients with bipolar disorder 1.1 型双相情感障碍患者的健康社会决定因素与住院和费用之间的关系。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Jan;30(1):72-85. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.1.72.
3
A nomogram for predicting echocardiogram prescription in outpatients: an analysis of the NAMCS database.用于预测门诊患者超声心动图检查处方的列线图:对美国国家门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)数据库的分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 16;10:1183504. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1183504. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of Low-Value Care Among Commercial and Medicaid Enrollees.商业保险参保者与医疗补助参保者的低价值医疗服务比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):954-960. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07823-8. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects Of Medicaid Expansion On Postpartum Coverage And Outpatient Utilization.医疗补助扩大对产后覆盖范围和门诊利用的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):77-84. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00547.
2
The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Continuous Enrollment: a Two-State Analysis.医疗补助扩大对连续参保的影响:两州分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1919-1924. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05101-8. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
3
Quality Management Strategies in Medicaid Managed Care: Perspectives From Medicaid, Plans, and Providers.医疗补助管理式医疗中的质量管理策略:医疗补助、计划和提供者的观点。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Feb;78(1):36-47. doi: 10.1177/1077558719841157. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
4
Qualitative perspectives of primary care providers who treat Medicaid managed care patients.治疗医疗补助管理式医疗患者的初级保健提供者的定性观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3516-9.
5
The Impact of Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type on Continuous Medicaid Enrollment: A Natural Experiment.医疗补助管理式医疗计划类型对连续医疗补助参保的影响:一项自然实验。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3770-3789. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13000. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
6
Association Between Health Plan Exit From Medicaid Managed Care and Quality of Care, 2006-2014.2006 - 2014年医疗补助管理式医疗中退出医保计划与医疗质量之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2524-2531. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7118.
7
Health Care Use and Spending for Medicaid Enrollees in Federally Qualified Health Centers Versus Other Primary Care Settings.联邦合格健康中心与其他初级保健机构中医疗补助参保者的医疗服务利用及支出情况
Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):1981-1989. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303341. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
8
Federally Qualified Health Center Use Among Dual Eligibles: Rates Of Hospitalizations And Emergency Department Visits.双重资格者中联邦合格健康中心的使用情况:住院率和急诊就诊率
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jul;34(7):1147-55. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0823.
9
Assessing the financial health of Medicaid managed care plans and the quality of patient care they provide.评估医疗补助管理式医疗计划的财务健康状况及其提供的患者护理质量。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2011 Jun;11:1-16.
10
Using HMOs to serve the Medicaid population: what are the effects on utilization and does the type of HMO matter?利用 HMO 为医疗补助人群服务:对利用有何影响,HMO 的类型是否重要?
Health Econ. 2011 Apr;20(4):446-60. doi: 10.1002/hec.1602.

医疗补助重点计划或商业医疗补助管理式医疗计划类型与门诊和急性护理的关联。

Association of Medicaid-Focused or Commercial Medicaid Managed Care Plan Type With Outpatient and Acute Care.

机构信息

Leveraging Evidence for Access and Development, Krea University, Sricity, India.

Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1672-1679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5408.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5408
PMID:33074283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7573794/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Enrollment in Medicaid managed care plans has increased rapidly, particularly in national commercial insurance plans. Whether the type of managed care plan is associated with the use of health services for Medicaid beneficiaries is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the use of outpatient and acute care between Medicaid enrollees randomly assigned to a national commercial managed care plan or a local Medicaid-focused managed care plan.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This natural experiment of a cohort of Medicaid enrollees randomly assigned to 2 managed care plans in a Northeastern US state was conducted from June 30, 2009, to June 30, 2013. Statistical analysis was performed from September 1, 2019, to August 30, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Assignment to a Medicaid-focused insurance plan or a commercial managed care plan.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and total inpatient and ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations.

RESULTS

A total of 8010 patients were included in the analysis: 4737 were assigned to a Medicaid-focused plan (2795 female [59.0%]; mean [SD] age, 17.8 [3.2] years) and 3273 to a commercial managed care plan (1915 female [58.5%]; mean [SD] age, 17.9 [3.3] years). Those randomly assigned to the Medicaid-focused plan had a mean (SD) of 6.67 (9.18) annual outpatient visits per person, and those assigned to the commercial plan had a mean (SD) of 8.36 (11.77) annual outpatient visits per person (adjusted absolute difference, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.31-2.13]; 22% relative difference). The increased use of outpatient visits in the commercial plan was associated with an increase in specialty care visits (mean [SD], 2.34 [6.31] visits in Medicaid-focused plan vs 3.75 [9.32] visits in commerical plan; adjusted absolute difference, 1.43 visits [95% CI, 1.25-1.56 visits]; 61% relative difference). Mean (SD) annual emergency department visits were 0.49 (1.39) per person in the Medicaid-focused plan and 0.51 (1.40) in the commercial plan (adjusted absolute difference, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.05]). Mean (SD) annual inpatient admissions were 0.067 (0.45) per person in the Medicaid-focused plan and 0.069 (0.53) in the commercial plan (adjusted absolute difference, 0.003 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.02]). Plan assignment was not significantly associated with ambulatory care-sensitive admissions. Results were consistent in instrumental variables analyses that accounted for disenrollment and switching.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Compared with Medicaid managed care enrollees assigned to a Medicaid-focused plan, those assigned to a commercial plan had more outpatient visits, particularly for specialty care, but had similar rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations. These findings suggest that the type of managed care plan may be associated with health services use and spending among Medicaid beneficiaries and that random assignment may help states understand how well different plans perform for enrollees.

摘要

重要性

医疗补助管理式医疗计划的参保人数迅速增加,尤其是在全国商业保险计划中。目前尚不清楚管理式医疗计划的类型是否与医疗补助受益人的医疗服务使用情况有关。

目的

比较随机分配到全国商业管理式医疗计划或当地以医疗补助为重点的管理式医疗计划的医疗补助参保者的门诊和急性护理使用情况。

设计、地点和参与者:这是在美国东北部一个州的医疗补助参保者随机分配到 2 种管理式医疗计划的自然实验队列研究,于 2009 年 6 月 30 日至 2013 年 6 月 30 日进行。统计分析于 2019 年 9 月 1 日至 2020 年 8 月 30 日进行。

干预措施

分配到以医疗补助为重点的保险计划或商业管理式医疗计划。

主要结局和测量指标

门诊就诊、急诊就诊以及总住院和门诊医疗敏感住院。

结果

共纳入 8010 例患者进行分析:4737 例被分配到以医疗补助为重点的计划(2795 例女性[59.0%];平均[标准差]年龄,17.8[3.2]岁),3273 例被分配到商业管理式医疗计划(1915 例女性[58.5%];平均[标准差]年龄,17.9[3.3]岁)。随机分配到以医疗补助为重点的计划的患者每人平均(标准差)有 6.67(9.18)次年度门诊就诊,而随机分配到商业计划的患者每人平均(标准差)有 8.36(11.77)次年度门诊就诊(调整后的绝对差异,1.72[95%置信区间,1.31-2.13];22%相对差异)。商业计划中门诊就诊的增加与专科就诊就诊的增加相关(平均[标准差],以医疗补助为重点的计划为 2.34[6.31]就诊;商业计划为 3.75[9.32]就诊;调整后的绝对差异,1.43就诊[95%置信区间,1.25-1.56 就诊];61%相对差异)。以医疗补助为重点的计划中,每人平均(标准差)每年急诊就诊 0.49(1.39)次,商业计划中为 0.51(1.40)次(调整后的绝对差异,0.02[95%置信区间,-0.02 至 0.05])。以医疗补助为重点的计划中,每人平均(标准差)每年住院 0.067(0.45)次,商业计划中为 0.069(0.53)次(调整后的绝对差异,0.003[95%置信区间,-0.01 至 0.02])。计划分配与门诊医疗敏感入院无显著相关性。在考虑到退保和转换的工具变量分析中,结果一致。

结论和相关性

与被分配到以医疗补助为重点的计划的医疗补助管理式医疗计划参保者相比,被分配到商业计划的参保者门诊就诊次数更多,尤其是专科就诊,但急诊就诊和住院率相似。这些发现表明,管理式医疗计划的类型可能与医疗补助受益人的医疗服务使用和支出有关,随机分配可能有助于各州了解不同计划对参保者的表现。