Faculty of Medicine, University of Tours, 10 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France.
Department of General Practice, Tours Regional University Hospital, Tours, France.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023 Feb 17;18(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13011-023-00522-5.
Promptly identifying individuals with addictive disorders reduces mortality and morbidity and improves quality of life. Although screening in primary care with the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral Treatment strategy has been recommended since 2008, it remains underutilized. This may be due to barriers including lack of time, patient reluctance or perhaps the timing and approach for discussing addiction with their patients.
This study aims to explore and cross-analyze patient and addiction specialist experiences and opinions about early addictive disorder screening in primary care to identify interaction-related screening obstacles.
Qualitative study with purposive maximum variation sampling among nine addiction specialists and eight individuals with addiction disorders conducted between April 2017 and November 2019 in Val-de-Loire, France.
Using a grounded theory approach, verbatim data was collected from face-to-face interviews with addiction specialists and individuals with addiction disorders. These interviews explored their opinions and experiences with addiction screening in primary care. Initially, two independent investigators analyzed the coded verbatim according to the data triangulation principle. Secondly, convergences and divergences between addiction specialist and addict verbatim categories were identified, analyzed, and conceptualized.
Four main interaction-related obstacles to early addictive disorder screening in primary care were identified and conceptualized: the new concepts of shared self-censorship and the patient's personal red line, issues not addressed during consultations, and opposition between how physicians and patients would like to approach addictive disorder screening.
To continue analysis of addictive disorder screening dynamics, further studies to examine the perspectives of all those involved in primary care are required. The information revealed from these studies will provide ideas to help patients and caregivers start discussing addiction and to help implement a collaborative team-based care approach.
This study is registered with the Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) under No. 2017-093.
及时识别具有成瘾障碍的个体可降低死亡率和发病率,并提高生活质量。尽管自 2008 年以来,人们一直建议在初级保健中采用“筛查、简短干预和转介治疗”策略进行筛查,但该策略的利用率仍然很低。这可能是由于存在一些障碍,包括缺乏时间、患者的不情愿,或者与患者讨论成瘾问题的时间和方法不当。
本研究旨在探讨和交叉分析患者和成瘾专家对初级保健中早期成瘾障碍筛查的经验和意见,以确定与互动相关的筛查障碍。
这是一项定性研究,于 2017 年 4 月至 2019 年 11 月在法国瓦勒德卢瓦尔省采用目的抽样法,选择了 9 名成瘾专家和 8 名成瘾障碍患者进行研究。
采用扎根理论方法,从成瘾专家和成瘾障碍患者的面对面访谈中收集逐字记录的数据。这些访谈探讨了他们对初级保健中成瘾筛查的意见和经验。最初,两名独立的研究者根据数据三角原理对编码的逐字记录进行分析。其次,确定、分析和概念化成瘾专家和成瘾患者逐字记录类别的一致性和分歧。
确定并概念化了初级保健中早期成瘾障碍筛查的 4 个主要与互动相关的障碍:共同自我审查和患者个人红线的新概念、咨询中未涉及的问题以及医生和患者对成瘾障碍筛查的看法之间的对立。
为了继续分析成瘾障碍筛查动态,需要进一步研究所有参与初级保健的人员的观点。从这些研究中揭示的信息将为帮助患者和护理人员开始讨论成瘾问题以及帮助实施协作的基于团队的护理方法提供思路。
本研究已在法国国家信息与自由委员会(CNIL)注册,编号为 2017-093。